Active Users:724 Time:28/10/2026 08:35:18 AM
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM
So you choose to believe in option 2, the eternal universe? It's as valid an interpretation as any other.

For the record, I tend to agree that the universe is not innately human- or cat-like. However, I find it just as irrational to believe that the universe has always existed or that it sprang from nothing. No evidence or logic supports those theories either.


I don't think the possibilities are restricted to the set you present. Cosmologists have proposed many hypotheses over the years, see e.g. brane cosmology. I don't specifically support any of them. There is a relatively large amount of empirical evidence in support of a Big Bang; whether that was the "start" of the universe or a transformative event within it, I don't know. Not actively believing in a specific position is the rational thing to do, when no position is supported by sufficient evidence.
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1316 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 749 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 923 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 384 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 361 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 786 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 956 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 842 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 829 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 738 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 872 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 374 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 312 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 739 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 787 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 746 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 914 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 856 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 818 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 942 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 353 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 318 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 793 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 898 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 800 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 987 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 785 Views
Time does not exist separately from space, as Einstein demonstrated almost a century ago. - 01/12/2010 03:36:56 AM 862 Views
I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet - 01/12/2010 03:56:38 AM 1148 Views
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet - 01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM 1166 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 1087 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 769 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 1013 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 716 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 907 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 799 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 758 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 709 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 757 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 920 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 821 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 327 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 789 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 741 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 338 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 750 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 731 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 750 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 310 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 311 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 307 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 709 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 823 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 311 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 326 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 870 Views

Reply to Message