Active Users:713 Time:14/06/2026 03:25:09 AM
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM
So you choose to believe in option 2, the eternal universe? It's as valid an interpretation as any other.

For the record, I tend to agree that the universe is not innately human- or cat-like. However, I find it just as irrational to believe that the universe has always existed or that it sprang from nothing. No evidence or logic supports those theories either.


I don't think the possibilities are restricted to the set you present. Cosmologists have proposed many hypotheses over the years, see e.g. brane cosmology. I don't specifically support any of them. There is a relatively large amount of empirical evidence in support of a Big Bang; whether that was the "start" of the universe or a transformative event within it, I don't know. Not actively believing in a specific position is the rational thing to do, when no position is supported by sufficient evidence.
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1249 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 691 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 838 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 342 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 331 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 731 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 870 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 784 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 771 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 684 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 815 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 346 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 284 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 687 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 730 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 665 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 860 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 800 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 756 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 882 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 326 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 292 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 730 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 830 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 744 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 937 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 730 Views
Time does not exist separately from space, as Einstein demonstrated almost a century ago. - 01/12/2010 03:36:56 AM 807 Views
I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet - 01/12/2010 03:56:38 AM 1088 Views
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet - 01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM 1117 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 1037 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 713 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 952 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 660 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 849 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 737 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 706 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 657 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 703 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 815 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 753 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 299 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 736 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 687 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 303 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 696 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 678 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 695 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 270 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 281 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 276 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 659 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 762 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 283 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 295 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 810 Views

Reply to Message