Active Users:441 Time:18/09/2025 09:02:49 PM
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM
So you choose to believe in option 2, the eternal universe? It's as valid an interpretation as any other.

For the record, I tend to agree that the universe is not innately human- or cat-like. However, I find it just as irrational to believe that the universe has always existed or that it sprang from nothing. No evidence or logic supports those theories either.


I don't think the possibilities are restricted to the set you present. Cosmologists have proposed many hypotheses over the years, see e.g. brane cosmology. I don't specifically support any of them. There is a relatively large amount of empirical evidence in support of a Big Bang; whether that was the "start" of the universe or a transformative event within it, I don't know. Not actively believing in a specific position is the rational thing to do, when no position is supported by sufficient evidence.
Reply to message
Is NASA set to reveal on Thursday signs of possible extraterrestial life within the solar system? - 30/11/2010 03:49:40 AM 1122 Views
Interesting. - 30/11/2010 04:43:15 AM 607 Views
crap! I will be watching this! - 30/11/2010 05:04:58 AM 740 Views
Goddammit Wikileaks get on this *NM* - 30/11/2010 05:05:19 AM 305 Views
There's no one to smear, why would wikileaks be interested? *NM* - 30/11/2010 01:45:58 PM 285 Views
If there is life in the solar system then it is likely a natural development in the universe. - 30/11/2010 05:12:38 AM 642 Views
Seems to put atheists in a bit of a catch-22 there. - 30/11/2010 05:54:25 AM 766 Views
Bwa? - 30/11/2010 06:45:33 AM 691 Views
Sorry, yeah. That is not my position. - 30/11/2010 07:03:17 AM 683 Views
The best will be when we find other intelligent life - 30/11/2010 02:32:35 PM 608 Views
Well, I don't actually agree with the first part of your Catch-22. At least, not entirely. - 30/11/2010 02:43:13 PM 732 Views
Using anthropomorphic terms to describe the universe only reflects on you, not on the universe. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:31:04 PM 310 Views
What an arbitrary and meaningless statement. *NM* - 30/11/2010 07:52:13 PM 248 Views
Anthropomorphizing concepts is a cognitive bias. - 30/11/2010 11:19:23 PM 597 Views
Only given a certain metaphysical framework. - 01/12/2010 12:18:09 AM 640 Views
Mind dumbing that down a bit? - 01/12/2010 12:43:47 AM 579 Views
I think he is saying - 01/12/2010 01:26:34 AM 774 Views
That ain't not a lot simpler - 01/12/2010 01:35:38 AM 705 Views
Yes. - 01/12/2010 01:44:41 AM 672 Views
Those worldviews are unsupported by empirical evidence. - 01/12/2010 01:41:27 AM 751 Views
No worldviews are supported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:57:23 AM 292 Views
Empiricism is unsupported by empirical evidence. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:21:52 AM 257 Views
Empirical evidence is the only objective standard. - 01/12/2010 02:59:18 AM 639 Views
Empirical evidence cannot fully explain reality. - 01/12/2010 03:28:41 AM 713 Views
Re: Question (use google now!): what's the net energy of the universe? - 01/12/2010 03:35:57 AM 661 Views
Re: - 01/12/2010 03:45:22 AM 859 Views
Re: Re: - 01/12/2010 04:04:38 AM 644 Views
Time does not exist separately from space, as Einstein demonstrated almost a century ago. - 01/12/2010 03:36:56 AM 720 Views
I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet - 01/12/2010 03:56:38 AM 981 Views
Re: I have my own theories about time, but they're not ready for presentation yet - 01/12/2010 04:30:44 AM 1031 Views
Yes. I know what empiricism is. - 01/12/2010 05:17:05 AM 951 Views
Re: You are a smart person. - 01/12/2010 03:09:13 AM 626 Views
Thanks. - 01/12/2010 03:30:46 AM 867 Views
Interesting. I agree with what you're saying, actually. - 30/11/2010 07:49:51 PM 578 Views
It won't change the argument in the least. - 01/12/2010 05:26:16 AM 769 Views
I have the feeling it's probably not going to be that. - 30/11/2010 06:02:48 AM 652 Views
Ohh, exciting! - 30/11/2010 08:37:32 AM 611 Views
noooo! - 30/11/2010 10:19:27 AM 576 Views
Boring primitive things would be cool. - 30/11/2010 02:54:10 PM 582 Views
Hey, there's a name I recognize, "Iron Lisa" - 30/11/2010 09:25:01 AM 717 Views
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE - 30/11/2010 02:33:30 PM 675 Views
I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. *NM* - 30/11/2010 02:35:04 PM 258 Views
"I, for one, welcome our new INSECT overlords"! - 01/12/2010 12:40:27 AM 652 Views
but we don't know if they're insects yet! - 01/12/2010 12:55:52 AM 594 Views
I'll not bow to any mere Bacterial Overlords, Eukaryote Overlords only!!! *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:02:20 AM 264 Views
So you're prejudiced against the nuclearly challenged? - 01/12/2010 01:09:57 AM 608 Views
Down right genocidal toward them - 01/12/2010 01:31:47 AM 587 Views
Genocide is a bit extreme - 01/12/2010 02:13:18 AM 619 Views
They had better have a green man *NM* - 30/11/2010 10:45:56 AM 230 Views
Because you need somebody to attack Aginor and Balthamel? *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:23 AM 233 Views
Oh no you didn't *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:14:55 AM 230 Views
Seriously. - 01/12/2010 01:26:54 AM 574 Views
Re: But then you got turned on just thinking about the phrase? - 01/12/2010 02:23:02 AM 674 Views
I'm actually a tiny bit giddy about this. *NM* - 01/12/2010 01:04:49 AM 244 Views
Re: Arsenic. *NM* - 01/12/2010 02:09:51 AM 260 Views
Re: Perhaps just as awesomely: - 01/12/2010 02:21:35 AM 720 Views

Reply to Message