Active Users:673 Time:14/12/2025 12:41:58 PM
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. Joel Send a noteboard - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM
Palin should be apologizing for 'targeting' certain districts because the representative in one of those districts was shot by a crazy man. Palin should not be, in any way, defending herself when being attacked by Liberals who are laying the blame solely at her feet with no evidence beyond the circumstantial in support of the accusation. (And the last is my understanding of the phrase 'blood libel' as used by Palin, which in this context would make perfect sense)

I wonder what would happen if I posted on facebook or made a website that said, "Someone should do something about China" And Russia nuked them 10 months later.

Try re-reading what the Representative said, which I only just found out was during an interview about her office being torn up after a self appointed militia leader urged people to throw bricks through the windows of everyone who voted for healthcare. She didn't object to the use of the word "target" but did worry about the "consequences" of images with her district and others in crosshairs. The interviewer pooh poohed the notion there could be ANY connection between her vandalized office and all the hatred and militance stirred up in the past two years, dismissed the idea anything bad could come of her district being shown in a gunsight. Her place of business was attacked and then she was shot; don't you think there MIGHT be something to her suggestion that all the vitriolic rhetoric and violent language against her played a role? I'll make the same suggestion to you that I did to Palin: Go to her hospital room and accuse her of "blood libel" to her face. Yeah, I'm sure that now that Giffords is out of her medically induced coma and recovering from the surgery to remove part of her skull so she didn't die she feels just awful about what SHE'S done to poor Sarah.... :rolleyes:

Try your little FB experiment with a US Congressmans name in place of Chinas and see how long it takes the Secret Service to call.... 8}
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2150 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 1010 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1175 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1225 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1186 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1546 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1085 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1112 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1102 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 1006 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 948 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1139 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 1019 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1066 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1107 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1089 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1124 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1180 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1274 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 947 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1094 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1069 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1151 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1192 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1338 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 1040 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1285 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 891 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1099 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 924 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1307 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1174 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1125 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1171 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1311 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1044 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1063 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1126 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 934 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1135 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1238 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1069 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1123 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1206 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1184 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens - 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM 1011 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 1030 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1045 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1081 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1334 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1351 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1094 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 1014 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 1037 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 1025 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1106 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1216 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1103 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1108 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1048 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1330 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1157 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 973 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1053 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1114 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 510 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 482 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 1006 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 523 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1196 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 945 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 977 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 935 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1093 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 966 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 949 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1103 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 992 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1157 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 987 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 1033 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 966 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1073 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 872 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 969 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 1009 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1089 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1218 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 961 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 1007 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1306 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1136 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1142 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 563 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 884 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 990 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1069 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 913 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 543 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1150 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1174 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1216 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1161 Views

Reply to Message