Active Users:625 Time:23/12/2025 05:24:49 AM
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. Joel Send a noteboard - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM
Palin should be apologizing for 'targeting' certain districts because the representative in one of those districts was shot by a crazy man. Palin should not be, in any way, defending herself when being attacked by Liberals who are laying the blame solely at her feet with no evidence beyond the circumstantial in support of the accusation. (And the last is my understanding of the phrase 'blood libel' as used by Palin, which in this context would make perfect sense)

I wonder what would happen if I posted on facebook or made a website that said, "Someone should do something about China" And Russia nuked them 10 months later.

Try re-reading what the Representative said, which I only just found out was during an interview about her office being torn up after a self appointed militia leader urged people to throw bricks through the windows of everyone who voted for healthcare. She didn't object to the use of the word "target" but did worry about the "consequences" of images with her district and others in crosshairs. The interviewer pooh poohed the notion there could be ANY connection between her vandalized office and all the hatred and militance stirred up in the past two years, dismissed the idea anything bad could come of her district being shown in a gunsight. Her place of business was attacked and then she was shot; don't you think there MIGHT be something to her suggestion that all the vitriolic rhetoric and violent language against her played a role? I'll make the same suggestion to you that I did to Palin: Go to her hospital room and accuse her of "blood libel" to her face. Yeah, I'm sure that now that Giffords is out of her medically induced coma and recovering from the surgery to remove part of her skull so she didn't die she feels just awful about what SHE'S done to poor Sarah.... :rolleyes:

Try your little FB experiment with a US Congressmans name in place of Chinas and see how long it takes the Secret Service to call.... 8}
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2152 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 1014 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1181 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1230 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1194 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1552 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1090 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1117 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1107 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 1007 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 954 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1145 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 1025 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1069 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1111 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1095 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1132 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1187 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1277 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 952 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1099 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1072 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1155 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1198 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1346 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 1046 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1288 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 893 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1106 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 929 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1312 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1182 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1131 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1179 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1314 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1044 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1071 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1131 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 940 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1140 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1241 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1075 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1133 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1209 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1190 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens - 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM 1018 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 1035 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1052 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1089 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1338 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1355 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1099 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 1020 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 1038 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 1030 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1116 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1220 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1108 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1114 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1055 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1336 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1160 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 981 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1058 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1117 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 514 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 483 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 1011 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 524 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1201 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 948 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 980 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 939 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1099 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 970 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 958 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1109 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 993 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1165 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 999 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 1038 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 969 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1080 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 876 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 974 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 1018 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1091 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1221 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 967 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 1015 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1318 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1138 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1145 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 565 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 887 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 998 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1074 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 915 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 546 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1154 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1182 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1224 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1169 Views

Reply to Message