Active Users:927 Time:02/05/2026 11:50:24 PM
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense ironclad Send a noteboard - 06/07/2011 07:02:33 PM
While I agree with you completely about nanny state laws, your logic about not wearing seatbelts doesn't completely hold up. If you're in an accident and not wearing a seatbelt, you can severely injure or even kill the other passengers in the car when your unbelted body goes flying around the cab at high speeds.

That said, I still agree with you that it should be your choice, not the government's, but you should at least know that your decision not to wear a seatbelt does place more lives at risk than your own, and factor that knowledge into your decision.

As far as I am concerned, people's freedom can go to hell as soon as their freedom or carelessness threaten others. As you explained in your first paragraph, that's the case when an unbelted person catapults through the car. The conclusion: make them do it by law. Admitting it's dangerous but leaving it to each on their own if they want to threaten their children or not takes the personal freedom a little too much for my taste ;)
*MySmiley*

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Reply to message
You can't make this stuff up: Helmet law protester dies in crash - 05/07/2011 08:47:14 PM 1095 Views
Kinda undermines his protest *NM* - 05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM 328 Views
Just a tad bit *NM* - 05/07/2011 09:06:24 PM 312 Views
How so? He wasn't demanding the right to survive crashes when only a helmet makes that possible. - 05/07/2011 11:06:44 PM 733 Views
New York feels that people should have to wear helmets for their own safety - 05/07/2011 11:20:36 PM 685 Views
He felt his own safety was his own concern. - 06/07/2011 12:07:05 AM 624 Views
Who do you think would have ended up paying for his care for the rest of his life if the accident - 06/07/2011 01:08:49 AM 785 Views
The same people who pay for everyone else whose actions render them vegetables. - 06/07/2011 01:50:20 AM 901 Views
Maybe a more effective argument you could use against me would be pointing out - 06/07/2011 02:33:21 AM 699 Views
Yeah, that is a better example. - 06/07/2011 03:03:01 AM 662 Views
Oops, ignore! *NM* - 06/07/2011 11:44:10 PM 392 Views
Now, who said irony wasn't funny? *NM* - 05/07/2011 09:22:58 PM 449 Views
what a fricking idiot - 05/07/2011 10:02:17 PM 861 Views
That's your opinion to which you're entitled. - 05/07/2011 11:19:36 PM 1120 Views
Anarchy, baby! *NM* - 06/07/2011 12:58:23 AM 554 Views
Uh Joel... - 06/07/2011 03:38:24 AM 734 Views
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense - 06/07/2011 07:02:33 PM 926 Views
Yes it does - 06/07/2011 07:32:54 PM 682 Views
how many people are really seriously injured that way? - 06/07/2011 07:15:16 PM 908 Views
Did you actually read my post? - 06/07/2011 07:36:13 PM 807 Views
my ex had 3 cracked ribs from an accident like that - 07/07/2011 02:46:07 AM 828 Views
Re: That's your opinion to which you're entitled. - 06/07/2011 05:18:12 PM 881 Views
Re: That's your opinion to which you're entitled. - 06/07/2011 06:13:44 PM 964 Views
Hold the phone here... - 06/07/2011 07:49:10 PM 1120 Views
+1 *NM* - 06/07/2011 08:42:14 PM 391 Views
You agree with him that the abortion debate is about a mothers convenience versus the babys life? - 06/07/2011 10:48:52 PM 811 Views
im not bringing abortion into this, its a separate issue *NM* - 06/07/2011 10:56:17 PM 382 Views
It's really not. - 07/07/2011 12:20:10 AM 820 Views
i'm really not - 07/07/2011 03:34:23 PM 919 Views
What else could the debate be about? - 06/07/2011 10:58:51 PM 746 Views
"The babys life", not just "life". - 07/07/2011 12:18:02 AM 1076 Views
I think I could make that up. *NM* - 05/07/2011 11:41:00 PM 347 Views
Smartass *NM* - 06/07/2011 12:57:22 AM 336 Views
Helmets help save lives. 'Onest. - 07/07/2011 04:40:42 PM 847 Views

Reply to Message