Active Users:749 Time:03/08/2025 12:27:40 PM
Re: Natural selection Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
NS is the process through which evolution acts. The process itself is governed by things like biological fitness. Fitness is determined by the genotype and phenotype of an individual to produce viable offspring. NS requires a selection pressure to “do its job”.

I think what you are having an issue with (based on reading other posts) is that it is impossible for us to know which trait will be beneficial to a given species in the wild before it happens. In order to test something like this we would have to have a static environment which is hard to come by. However some have managed it. Have you ever heard of the guppy experiment? That experiment shows how selection pressure causes natural selection for a certain trait and thus can alter the gene pool (and cause micro-evolution). In this environment you can then hypothesize about what traits will enhance ones fitness given the selection pressure. Thus you have tested NS.

Edit: I wanted to add that NS is not random like most people think it is. The random portion about NS is finding out which individuals, if any, have the "right" combo of genes for a given selection pressure. Thus if a selection pressure is great enough or radical enough some species will not have the "right" genes and go extinct. NS is very specific in selecting the animals in a species with certain traits.
Guppies
This message last edited by Night Walker on 07/08/2011 at 03:08:17 AM
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1119 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 763 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 877 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 827 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 819 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 681 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 882 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 692 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 899 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 902 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 805 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 824 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 835 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 937 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 785 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 752 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 736 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 827 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 965 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 894 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 742 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 832 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 836 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 835 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 855 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 864 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 838 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 858 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 919 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 909 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 841 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 983 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 741 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 955 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 778 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 824 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 751 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 909 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 751 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 876 Views

Reply to Message