Active Users:1431 Time:02/05/2026 03:01:12 AM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1270 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 917 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 1039 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 989 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 999 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 837 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 1061 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 848 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 1088 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 1081 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 984 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 1015 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 1047 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 1090 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 966 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 920 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 909 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 1025 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 1167 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 1081 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 910 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 1011 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 996 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 983 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 1006 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 1040 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 1012 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 1049 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 1075 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 1089 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 1014 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1142 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 892 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 1116 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 945 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 1005 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 912 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 1064 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 944 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 1038 Views

Reply to Message