Active Users:443 Time:29/10/2026 11:01:04 AM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1400 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 1033 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 1166 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 1122 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 1122 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 950 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 1174 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 966 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 1216 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 1215 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 1115 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 1169 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 1165 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 1222 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 1076 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 1023 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 1019 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 1140 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 1283 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 1192 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 1037 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 1115 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 1109 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 1082 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 1135 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 1158 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 1132 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 1177 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 1196 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 1207 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 1136 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1258 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 1004 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 1217 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 1068 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 1140 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 1031 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 1199 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 1061 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 1154 Views

Reply to Message