Active Users:1514 Time:01/05/2026 09:23:38 PM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1266 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 913 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 1037 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 983 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 996 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 834 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 1059 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 847 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 1084 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 1077 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 981 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 1011 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 1045 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 1086 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 964 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 915 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 904 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 1021 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 1165 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 1077 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 906 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 1009 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 994 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 981 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 1004 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 1037 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 1007 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 1046 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 1070 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 1082 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 1010 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1139 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 888 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 1111 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 941 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 1004 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 910 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 1064 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 941 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 1036 Views

Reply to Message