Even if you can only measure it after the fact, that doesn't mean it cannot be "predicted or tested."
You can't KNOW, or ACCURATELY predict ANYTHING that has never been tested before, but you can make predictions, do tests, and study the results. This would apply to determining whether a new trait is beneficial for a population of organisms as much as it would to anything else in science.
You can't KNOW, or ACCURATELY predict ANYTHING that has never been tested before, but you can make predictions, do tests, and study the results. This would apply to determining whether a new trait is beneficial for a population of organisms as much as it would to anything else in science.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1328 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
965 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
1095 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
1095 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
1050 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
1053 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
888 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
1109 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
1131 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
1042 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
1096 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
1109 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
1152 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
1013 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
1088 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
1124 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
961 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
960 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
1074 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
444 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
999 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
1058 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
1064 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
1091 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
1065 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
1103 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
456 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
456 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
493 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
493 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
1073 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
1193 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
944 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
1156 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
997 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
1071 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
964 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
1131 Views