Active Users:421 Time:17/09/2025 07:53:33 PM
2 things Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
First, NS is always specific in nature, meaning there is always a selection pressure. There has never been a case where natural selection doesn’t involve specific selection. It is intrinsic to NS. Take the guppies experiment without predators. The new selection pressure is now sex. Get rid of sex and the selection pressure might be how fast one can convert nutrients, take that away and there will be something else. There is never a static system (which you seem to imply there is) where specific selection is not on-going.

Second, (I use this phrase loosely) we can not know the mind of nature. To expand on that, it is impossible to know what selection pressure will be greatest each season. We can only evaluate specific traits on a per period basis under certain conditions. We can then use those results to make assumptions on the whole and provide evidence for theories. This is the very nature of science. By your line of reasoning all of science is tautology due to the nature of the universe.
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1140 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 780 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 891 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 846 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 852 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 707 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 904 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 710 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 920 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 927 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 824 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 848 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 858 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 955 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 808 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 772 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 762 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 843 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 987 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 913 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 766 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 847 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 859 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 852 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 874 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 894 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 856 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 888 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 941 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 926 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 866 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1000 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 760 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 977 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 799 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 847 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 772 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 934 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 784 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 899 Views

Reply to Message