That sounds awfully messed up. One part of the article that really caught my eye was the part where the Supreme Court said that Davis had failed to conclusively prove his innocence. Um. Isn't the entire justice system based on the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty? Shouldn't the prosecutors have to prove that he is guilty, instead of the other way around?
Yes, he was convicted by a jury, but given what was said there about witnesses changing their story, combined with the sketchy evidence ...
Executing a person under those circumstances is not all right.
Yes, he was convicted by a jury, but given what was said there about witnesses changing their story, combined with the sketchy evidence ...
Executing a person under those circumstances is not all right.
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
i'm proud to live in a country where you can be executed based on circumstantial evidence...
- 22/09/2011 04:06:07 PM
1471 Views
And yet the Supreme Court didn't stop it. You're a lawyer right?
- 22/09/2011 04:19:05 PM
842 Views
Well, that right there was an ignorant thing to say.
- 22/09/2011 04:32:49 PM
906 Views
But they get all the media attention
- 22/09/2011 04:45:03 PM
781 Views
*NM*
Cameron Todd Willingham is white, and his story is a national one since Perry is running for Pres
- 23/09/2011 03:41:52 PM
655 Views
those numbers are less schocking when you consider that blacks commet a lot more murders *NM*
- 22/09/2011 05:43:51 PM
337 Views
And this is a typically illogical argument.
- 22/09/2011 11:11:48 PM
818 Views
You're kidding, right?
- 23/09/2011 02:55:44 PM
770 Views
Re: You're kidding, right?
- 23/09/2011 07:36:38 PM
791 Views
Juror bias. *NM*
- 23/09/2011 08:35:10 PM
309 Views
Your evidence for that? *NM*
- 23/09/2011 11:33:58 PM
316 Views
Twenty-one years of life in the American South.
- 24/09/2011 12:40:10 AM
744 Views
Of course I'm interested
- 24/09/2011 04:03:51 AM
685 Views
From me being too involved with the subject material. I apologize.
- 24/09/2011 11:16:06 AM
663 Views
While I largely agree with your argument, I agree more with Cannoli on the NAACP.
- 23/09/2011 07:46:06 PM
726 Views
Huh.
- 22/09/2011 04:47:20 PM
852 Views
That jumped out at me too.
- 22/09/2011 04:50:52 PM
772 Views
What really confuses me
- 22/09/2011 04:58:32 PM
726 Views
That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
- 22/09/2011 05:05:40 PM
804 Views
Re: That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
- 22/09/2011 05:21:59 PM
865 Views
If the original trial is shown to be flawed that's supposed to require a new trial.
- 22/09/2011 08:25:51 PM
703 Views
Well...
- 22/09/2011 05:18:54 PM
881 Views
So if I understand you correctly...
- 22/09/2011 05:23:00 PM
819 Views
Yes, that is correct. And proving witness coercion is likely to be difficult if not impossible. *NM*
- 22/09/2011 05:30:37 PM
284 Views
it is only confusing because the evidence isn't really that shaky
- 22/09/2011 08:54:21 PM
763 Views
If I understand the Supreme Court correctly, the reason they denied the stay of execution was
- 22/09/2011 08:25:14 PM
800 Views
I completely support the Death Penalty without question.....
- 22/09/2011 08:27:54 PM
704 Views
Unreasonable doubt is impossible to eliminate.
- 22/09/2011 09:54:43 PM
783 Views
Doubt can be eliminated.....any question about Dalmer?
- 23/09/2011 01:00:52 PM
769 Views
Maybe he was framed by an enemy, government conspiracy or aliens.
- 23/09/2011 01:54:21 PM
724 Views
Jigga what? 
*NM*
- 23/09/2011 03:36:07 PM
347 Views
*NM*
- 23/09/2011 03:36:07 PM
347 Views
"I do not know if I was then a man dreaming I was a butterfly or am now a butterfly..."
- 23/09/2011 06:50:34 PM
709 Views
Circumstantial evidence is not, I believe, a bar to conviction.
- 22/09/2011 09:43:56 PM
674 Views
Regarding the salvation thing, that is an argument FOR the death penalty, in my mind.
- 22/09/2011 11:37:16 PM
754 Views
That motive is seflish and thus fatal.
- 23/09/2011 01:17:00 AM
682 Views
Bullshit
- 25/09/2011 03:53:05 AM
916 Views
Where do YOU get the idea that imperfect contrition is good enough?
- 25/09/2011 02:29:18 PM
1191 Views
Thank God you're not an evangelist.
- 23/09/2011 02:59:06 PM
719 Views
And I pity the souls you have ministered to. They're in for a rude shock at their judgement
- 25/09/2011 04:01:05 AM
709 Views
lol roman catholicism *NM*
- 25/09/2011 04:39:55 AM
289 Views
Not just Roman Catholics, y'know, everyone who thinks God was not BSing about judgement.
- 25/09/2011 09:47:12 PM
766 Views
lol hellfire and brimstone *NM*
- 26/09/2011 12:12:28 AM
285 Views
I suppose in a consequences free world everything is a source of amusement.
- 26/09/2011 12:33:14 AM
907 Views
You really don't understand irony, do you? Particularly as it applies to your post about this case.
- 22/09/2011 11:26:49 PM
802 Views
.
- 23/09/2011 08:21:38 AM
745 Views
A list of anecdotal wrongs does not prove anything. If convictions can be wrong, so can exonerations *NM*
- 25/09/2011 04:03:26 AM
288 Views
sorry if i don't have time to link to every 
thing i've read on the subject
- 23/09/2011 02:54:50 PM
868 Views
thing i've read on the subject
- 23/09/2011 02:54:50 PM
868 Views
Well I would think you would have picked an article that offers some iota of proof of his innocence.
- 25/09/2011 04:14:45 AM
790 Views
Well, I wouldn't call eyewitness accounts circumstancial evidence.
- 23/09/2011 11:45:48 PM
728 Views
Nor would I, but I've heard that lawyers say, "an eye witness is the worst witness you can have."
- 25/09/2011 03:23:53 PM
725 Views