Once a person is pronounced Guilty, the perspective must change. They then are guilty. There are then pretty much two ways to get that overturned. Either there's a procedural error which then will overturn that verdict, or you must prove that you're innocent.
Remember the phrase that is used..."Innocent until proven guilty." Well guess what...he was proven guilty (for whatever reason....its totally outside the debate at this point). He must now prove that he is innocent.
~Jeordam
Remember the phrase that is used..."Innocent until proven guilty." Well guess what...he was proven guilty (for whatever reason....its totally outside the debate at this point). He must now prove that he is innocent.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
i'm proud to live in a country where you can be executed based on circumstantial evidence...
- 22/09/2011 04:06:07 PM
1535 Views
And yet the Supreme Court didn't stop it. You're a lawyer right?
- 22/09/2011 04:19:05 PM
897 Views
Well, that right there was an ignorant thing to say.
- 22/09/2011 04:32:49 PM
965 Views
But they get all the media attention
- 22/09/2011 04:45:03 PM
840 Views
*NM*
Cameron Todd Willingham is white, and his story is a national one since Perry is running for Pres
- 23/09/2011 03:41:52 PM
710 Views
those numbers are less schocking when you consider that blacks commet a lot more murders *NM*
- 22/09/2011 05:43:51 PM
365 Views
And this is a typically illogical argument.
- 22/09/2011 11:11:48 PM
880 Views
You're kidding, right?
- 23/09/2011 02:55:44 PM
845 Views
Re: You're kidding, right?
- 23/09/2011 07:36:38 PM
856 Views
Juror bias. *NM*
- 23/09/2011 08:35:10 PM
332 Views
Your evidence for that? *NM*
- 23/09/2011 11:33:58 PM
343 Views
Twenty-one years of life in the American South.
- 24/09/2011 12:40:10 AM
802 Views
Of course I'm interested
- 24/09/2011 04:03:51 AM
740 Views
From me being too involved with the subject material. I apologize.
- 24/09/2011 11:16:06 AM
718 Views
While I largely agree with your argument, I agree more with Cannoli on the NAACP.
- 23/09/2011 07:46:06 PM
785 Views
Huh.
- 22/09/2011 04:47:20 PM
905 Views
That jumped out at me too.
- 22/09/2011 04:50:52 PM
832 Views
What really confuses me
- 22/09/2011 04:58:32 PM
776 Views
That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
- 22/09/2011 05:05:40 PM
883 Views
Re: That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
- 22/09/2011 05:21:59 PM
920 Views
If the original trial is shown to be flawed that's supposed to require a new trial.
- 22/09/2011 08:25:51 PM
784 Views
Well...
- 22/09/2011 05:18:54 PM
941 Views
So if I understand you correctly...
- 22/09/2011 05:23:00 PM
878 Views
Yes, that is correct. And proving witness coercion is likely to be difficult if not impossible. *NM*
- 22/09/2011 05:30:37 PM
311 Views
it is only confusing because the evidence isn't really that shaky
- 22/09/2011 08:54:21 PM
831 Views
You must change your perspective.....
- 22/09/2011 07:33:20 PM
831 Views
If I understand the Supreme Court correctly, the reason they denied the stay of execution was
- 22/09/2011 08:25:14 PM
856 Views
I completely support the Death Penalty without question.....
- 22/09/2011 08:27:54 PM
759 Views
Unreasonable doubt is impossible to eliminate.
- 22/09/2011 09:54:43 PM
841 Views
Doubt can be eliminated.....any question about Dalmer?
- 23/09/2011 01:00:52 PM
893 Views
Maybe he was framed by an enemy, government conspiracy or aliens.
- 23/09/2011 01:54:21 PM
780 Views
Jigga what? 
*NM*
- 23/09/2011 03:36:07 PM
442 Views
*NM*
- 23/09/2011 03:36:07 PM
442 Views
"I do not know if I was then a man dreaming I was a butterfly or am now a butterfly..."
- 23/09/2011 06:50:34 PM
763 Views
Circumstantial evidence is not, I believe, a bar to conviction.
- 22/09/2011 09:43:56 PM
741 Views
Regarding the salvation thing, that is an argument FOR the death penalty, in my mind.
- 22/09/2011 11:37:16 PM
801 Views
That motive is seflish and thus fatal.
- 23/09/2011 01:17:00 AM
753 Views
Bullshit
- 25/09/2011 03:53:05 AM
974 Views
Where do YOU get the idea that imperfect contrition is good enough?
- 25/09/2011 02:29:18 PM
1273 Views
Thank God you're not an evangelist.
- 23/09/2011 02:59:06 PM
773 Views
And I pity the souls you have ministered to. They're in for a rude shock at their judgement
- 25/09/2011 04:01:05 AM
762 Views
lol roman catholicism *NM*
- 25/09/2011 04:39:55 AM
317 Views
Not just Roman Catholics, y'know, everyone who thinks God was not BSing about judgement.
- 25/09/2011 09:47:12 PM
824 Views
lol hellfire and brimstone *NM*
- 26/09/2011 12:12:28 AM
313 Views
I suppose in a consequences free world everything is a source of amusement.
- 26/09/2011 12:33:14 AM
967 Views
You really don't understand irony, do you? Particularly as it applies to your post about this case.
- 22/09/2011 11:26:49 PM
874 Views
.
- 23/09/2011 08:21:38 AM
804 Views
A list of anecdotal wrongs does not prove anything. If convictions can be wrong, so can exonerations *NM*
- 25/09/2011 04:03:26 AM
318 Views
sorry if i don't have time to link to every 
thing i've read on the subject
- 23/09/2011 02:54:50 PM
954 Views
thing i've read on the subject
- 23/09/2011 02:54:50 PM
954 Views
Well I would think you would have picked an article that offers some iota of proof of his innocence.
- 25/09/2011 04:14:45 AM
856 Views
Well, I wouldn't call eyewitness accounts circumstancial evidence.
- 23/09/2011 11:45:48 PM
786 Views
Nor would I, but I've heard that lawyers say, "an eye witness is the worst witness you can have."
- 25/09/2011 03:23:53 PM
775 Views