Yeah, do more of what made folks mad enough to pass a federal law and kill your stock price.
Joel Send a noteboard - 30/09/2011 08:35:19 PM

That should help your bottom line.
All that remains is for BoA to explain how their predation is all the evil GOVERNMENTS fault for making their PREVIOUS predation illegal. And not giving them enough taxpayer bailout money when they went bankrupt; apparently BoA has found another way to get its hands on the publics money.
Tell me again how the economy will improve if big government gets out of the private sectors way (but stays close by to provide more taxpayer handouts.)

Tell me again how the economy will improve if big government gets out of the private sectors way (but stays close by to provide more taxpayer handouts.)

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Bank of America faces outrage over debit card charge
30/09/2011 06:27:03 PM
- 944 Views
I'm so glad I don't bank with them.
30/09/2011 07:01:32 PM
- 545 Views
I just went to TD for my personal acount today...we are still looking for our joint account... *NM*
30/09/2011 08:15:57 PM
- 196 Views
screw all the big banks
30/09/2011 07:19:36 PM
- 493 Views
I love my credit union, so drama free. I would never switch to a bank. *NM*
01/10/2011 03:04:39 AM
- 237 Views
Yeah, do more of what made folks mad enough to pass a federal law and kill your stock price.
30/09/2011 08:35:19 PM
- 478 Views

Hopefully this means no-one will dare do that here, having seen the reaction.
30/09/2011 11:11:29 PM
- 492 Views
Can't believe they're still in business. They are a shame to the human race. *NM*
30/09/2011 11:26:32 PM
- 212 Views
You mean BoA, not banks in general, right?
01/10/2011 02:41:36 AM
- 606 Views

Maintaining a modest sum of money in checking/savings/CDs obviates this charge and most others
01/10/2011 02:02:51 AM
- 540 Views
Hm?
01/10/2011 02:12:41 AM
- 482 Views
Right. It's not an issue if the combined total meets BoAs requirement.
01/10/2011 02:33:15 AM
- 646 Views
The bank may have the right to protect itself from losing money
01/10/2011 03:15:52 AM
- 561 Views
Yes, but griping about pains arising from symptoms does nothing to cure the disease.
01/10/2011 03:25:29 AM
- 546 Views
I'm still right.
*NM*
01/10/2011 04:23:06 AM
- 202 Views

As long as account holders indefinitely surrender enough of their money for the bank to invest?
01/10/2011 02:35:49 AM
- 470 Views
No. I mean BoA doesn't want to have clients who cost money rather than make money for the bank.
01/10/2011 02:57:20 AM
- 540 Views
Well, charging people $5/month to use their own money will not accomplish that goal.
01/10/2011 03:24:07 AM
- 492 Views
Sure it will. They'll pay the fees or they'll leave. Either way BoA wins on that front.
01/10/2011 03:31:23 AM
- 597 Views
I suppose, if turning the departure of account holders into a stampede counts as "winning."
01/10/2011 04:18:11 AM
- 566 Views
If it's limited to the targeted account holders, the unprofitable ones, then it is winning.
01/10/2011 04:53:20 AM
- 553 Views
But the targeting is determined by how much money account holders semi-permanently loan banks.
01/10/2011 05:49:57 AM
- 617 Views
Love my credit union, I would never use a bank if I absolutely didn't have too. Go CUs!
*NM*
01/10/2011 03:06:21 AM
- 206 Views
