Active Users:368 Time:14/09/2026 11:09:52 PM
Re: Bullshit. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/08/2012 10:52:02 PM
Unless she slept through the whole thing, she was in a position to consent. If someone wakes up to heavy petting a few hours after consensual sex and does not say, "stop," consent is heavily implied because previously given and very easily withdrawn.

So it isn't rape if the rapist what? Doesn't take too long? stops after 5 minutes to ask the victim if they're okay with it?
And since when were we just talking about heavy petting? He was having sex with her when she woke up - that is the accusation.
This idea of your's that consent is implied is utter nonsense - if you go to sleep is is pretty obvious that it is over.

It is not rape if someone who had sex a few hours ago can, but does not, say, "no," to more. If asleep during sex she could say nothing, so that would be rape.

If someone performed them on me and I never told them to stop I would not blame them for my "refused refusal." We are not talking about a random sex act out of the blue, but someone who (supposedly) already agreed to sex withdrawing consent. Once consent is formally given expecting it be formally withdrawn is reasonable.

she consented to have sex with him, not become a blow up doll for him to use when he felt like it. Are you some crazy 1970s stereotype?

No. Obviously a person must be awake before sex, as such, or it is rape, regardless of previous events. If, however, they are awake and previously consented, it is not rape unless they withdraw that consent. I was not there and doubt you were, so all we can take for granted is what those who were agree happened. If that includes sex while she was still asleep, Assange is lucky he did not end up like John Wayne Bobbit. Otherwise, presumption of innocence includes rape accusations.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Rape - British left wing politician takes on American right wing politician in stupidest comment off - 22/08/2012 11:03:50 PM 1194 Views
Galloway - I'll always remember him for being a Cat to be honest. - 22/08/2012 11:14:58 PM 793 Views
Erm... what on earth is that? - 22/08/2012 11:19:13 PM 582 Views
Celebrity Big Brother in the UK - 22/08/2012 11:22:17 PM 665 Views
People who support abortion only for rape are the most retarded in the whole debate - 23/08/2012 01:05:17 AM 742 Views
Bullshit - 23/08/2012 05:01:24 AM 638 Views
That's an interesting variation with some legitimacy, though not compelling, to me anyway - 23/08/2012 07:25:50 AM 675 Views
That is a dangerous line of logic. - 23/08/2012 09:26:25 PM 963 Views
Okay, that really wasn't connected to my comments - 24/08/2012 02:39:21 AM 596 Views
Sure it was, but we can do it your way. - 24/08/2012 04:10:37 AM 662 Views
Yet you don't, you jump the gun here too - 24/08/2012 04:37:02 AM 701 Views
I was trying to cut to the chase; like I say, I followed your logic: I just disliked where it led. - 24/08/2012 06:10:40 AM 780 Views
Disliking the conclusion doesn't invalidate the logic, and stop veering out of the debate boundary - 24/08/2012 06:43:43 AM 699 Views
No, the logics invalidity does that, though you do not seem to like its conclusion either. - 24/08/2012 07:48:21 AM 898 Views
I'm not even sure what that means - 25/08/2012 12:38:56 AM 594 Views
The logic is invalid because invalid, however either of us feels about where it leads. - 25/08/2012 10:37:34 PM 679 Views
Okay, we're done here - 26/08/2012 05:36:28 AM 654 Views
Quotes are not my opinion. - 26/08/2012 06:37:19 AM 601 Views
You'd really benefit from post-secondary education. - 26/08/2012 12:14:02 PM 745 Views
Haven't you and Joel had about the same amount of post-secondary education, actually? - 27/08/2012 01:31:43 AM 736 Views
T^T - 27/08/2012 04:39:33 AM 662 Views
Is that the emoticon for perky titties? *NM* - 27/08/2012 11:07:06 PM 334 Views
He is an absolute berk. *NM* - 23/08/2012 01:08:58 AM 523 Views
To be honest, I think people MIGHT be overreacting to both comments. - 23/08/2012 01:33:54 AM 764 Views
Really? *NM* - 23/08/2012 06:33:46 AM 393 Views
Yeah. - 23/08/2012 06:40:05 AM 666 Views
I expect it is more of a "stating the obvious" response. - 23/08/2012 02:01:18 PM 659 Views
Heh, I didn't think so. - 23/08/2012 05:44:55 PM 704 Views
I said Akins comments needed MORE context. - 23/08/2012 08:50:09 PM 808 Views
Yes, I saw that. - 23/08/2012 10:28:50 PM 609 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that. - 23/08/2012 11:04:40 PM 683 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that. - 23/08/2012 11:08:46 PM 616 Views
Science sometimes produces shocking discoveries. - 23/08/2012 11:28:47 PM 655 Views
And sometimes one doctor with an agenda pulls "facts" out of the air - 23/08/2012 11:37:37 PM 684 Views
No argument there. - 23/08/2012 11:46:01 PM 691 Views
This - 23/08/2012 08:50:43 PM 691 Views
Okay. I misunderstood. Sorry. *NM* - 23/08/2012 09:58:20 PM 359 Views
Eh - 23/08/2012 10:37:15 PM 637 Views
Well, I didn't take it that way. - 23/08/2012 10:42:01 PM 765 Views
Good - 24/08/2012 02:20:27 AM 714 Views
Ah, I can understand if that is the case. - 23/08/2012 07:46:38 PM 693 Views
I read it the same way Jen did - 23/08/2012 08:49:16 PM 656 Views
Why? - 23/08/2012 08:51:59 PM 675 Views
See your reply here - the bit before the comma then the bit after it. - 23/08/2012 09:06:20 PM 680 Views
You can see where there's room for doubt in that though, surely. - 23/08/2012 09:20:19 PM 629 Views
I accept there are exceptions under some circumstances - but they are exceptions, not the rule. - 23/08/2012 09:44:36 PM 660 Views
Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 10:28:13 PM 632 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 10:50:59 PM 617 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 11:15:50 PM 603 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 11:28:56 PM 703 Views
couple things - 24/08/2012 01:57:04 AM 598 Views
Re: couple things - 24/08/2012 02:26:23 PM 665 Views
Re: couple things - 24/08/2012 02:45:38 PM 588 Views
Re: couple things - 25/08/2012 12:11:03 AM 654 Views
You may be talking about Galloway and not Assange, but Galloway was talking about Assange. - 24/08/2012 06:28:00 PM 633 Views
Ew. - 24/08/2012 06:56:27 PM 641 Views
Yes, that about covers it. - 24/08/2012 07:42:13 PM 616 Views
Yes, I was talking about Galoway and what he said - 25/08/2012 12:15:15 AM 784 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify... - 23/08/2012 11:34:51 PM 706 Views
I can - 23/08/2012 11:05:05 PM 570 Views
I gotta say I am with Paul - 24/08/2012 12:27:44 AM 675 Views
Hm. - 24/08/2012 02:08:33 AM 587 Views
OK - 23/08/2012 09:35:35 PM 625 Views
Bullshit. - 23/08/2012 10:00:54 PM 588 Views
Re: Bullshit. - 23/08/2012 10:52:02 PM 777 Views
To start again then Joel - 23/08/2012 11:14:07 PM 607 Views
My mistake then, sorry. - 23/08/2012 11:32:34 PM 648 Views
Agreeing without agreeing. - 23/08/2012 12:24:10 PM 726 Views
I have gotten used to you being right for the wrong reasons. - 23/08/2012 07:42:32 PM 622 Views
Yes - 23/08/2012 06:34:38 AM 763 Views
Indeed - 23/08/2012 08:47:40 PM 604 Views
I don't know about Galloway but Akin is being made to pay for his commnets - 23/08/2012 04:37:12 PM 697 Views
Um, I'm not sure about that last bit - 23/08/2012 10:43:15 PM 630 Views
this issue has been discussed none stop for two days and this almost never mentioned - 24/08/2012 12:28:25 PM 619 Views
well, that is where I'm confused. - 24/08/2012 07:03:16 PM 647 Views
Maybe I watch to much CNN - 24/08/2012 07:30:23 PM 587 Views
Yeah, I'm curious about that last point as well. - 24/08/2012 02:53:43 AM 668 Views
McCaskills campaign ran ads during the GOP primary calling Akin the "most conservative" candidate. - 24/08/2012 03:33:18 AM 816 Views
Interesting. - 24/08/2012 04:49:51 AM 605 Views
no it isn't kinda true - 24/08/2012 12:50:53 PM 631 Views

Reply to Message