Active Users:1006 Time:31/01/2026 11:12:21 AM
he will lose in arbitration, whether or not he is innocent. that's the point moondog Send a noteboard - 28/08/2012 03:55:38 PM
whether or not he failed 100 tests, you'd think that would be the kind of thing that got reported in all these stories about him since he walked away from arbitration. yes, arbitration, not an actual trial with a chance of appeal. also, the UCI has not actually stripped armstrong of any wins yet, they seem to believe that he has not tested positive for any banned drugs, or are at least willing to hear the actual evidence provided to them.

look, i know you seem to have a personal vendetta against armstrong for some reason, whatever that may be. i know i have my own share of athletes i just can't stand to see succeed. but the fact still remains that the USADA is the only one seemingly concerned with this case, everyone else who has any influence seems to be on armstrong's side. if we took the lot of them to arbitration with USADA maybe there would be a fair hearing. as it is, the USADA will win arbitration no matter what the facts are so he is simply walking away from the process because he knows he will lose either way.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Lance Armstrong - drugs cheat. - 24/08/2012 10:51:35 AM 1764 Views
You mean giving up in disgust after relentless hounding? - 24/08/2012 11:34:05 AM 1060 Views
No, I meant what I said - 24/08/2012 12:08:05 PM 1135 Views
Delighted - 24/08/2012 12:21:12 PM 1007 Views
Re: Delighted - 24/08/2012 12:36:20 PM 1271 Views
you think the case against Contador is fishy but you cheerlead the witch hunt of Armstong? - 25/08/2012 04:11:23 AM 1014 Views
No. Can you please reread what I actually wrote. - 25/08/2012 09:46:47 AM 946 Views
Snoop = hypocrite - great job random! *NM* - 25/08/2012 04:27:38 PM 569 Views
Damage to cycling? LMAO good one! *NM* - 24/08/2012 03:23:48 PM 503 Views
Yea I choked up a bit when I read that - 25/08/2012 12:09:13 AM 1052 Views
Sad thing is I wondered who would be awarded the victory now his have been stripped... - 24/08/2012 05:31:20 PM 1000 Views
And this is why I have a hard time blaming Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 06:16:14 PM 1056 Views
I don't. - 24/08/2012 11:51:14 PM 1065 Views
Oh come on. - 25/08/2012 01:18:18 AM 1241 Views
Yes? - 25/08/2012 10:07:34 AM 1159 Views
No. - 25/08/2012 12:53:49 PM 1183 Views
Oh. - 26/08/2012 05:28:50 PM 1168 Views
And this is why doping must be vigorously and strictly punished. - 25/08/2012 11:50:52 PM 1130 Views
Hopefully they will leave the 1st places empty - 24/08/2012 11:44:49 PM 956 Views
That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials. - 26/08/2012 03:01:30 AM 1034 Views
Re: That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials. - 26/08/2012 05:32:38 PM 1036 Views
It is not proof, only far from conclusive evidence. - 26/08/2012 11:02:38 PM 1083 Views
I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 06:53:04 PM 1074 Views
Re: I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 11:59:14 PM 1137 Views
Haters gotta hate. Its not like he's gonna get a fair hearing. *NM* - 24/08/2012 10:25:18 PM 553 Views
Yeah, they were going to use evidence and everything against him and not cower before his bullying - 25/08/2012 12:01:44 AM 985 Views
Nevermind, saw your post up above *NM* - 25/08/2012 01:05:03 AM 543 Views
Your reaction seems kinda over the top and spiteful, what's up with that? - 25/08/2012 01:15:12 AM 1176 Views
Pleasure at seeing someone who has bullied and blustered for so long faced with justice. - 25/08/2012 10:11:15 AM 1072 Views
You are a very small-minded person. - 25/08/2012 04:26:46 PM 1083 Views
And you are a very annoying person. - 25/08/2012 06:06:50 PM 1035 Views
In the immortal words of Anonymous2000 ... "+1" - 25/08/2012 06:32:10 PM 1200 Views
-1 - 25/08/2012 10:23:25 PM 955 Views
I don't think 'nemesis' is a term that should be used regarding sporting events - 25/08/2012 07:51:35 PM 1112 Views
Heh. This exchange is reminding me of Yes, Minister. - 25/08/2012 10:04:59 PM 1011 Views
I've actually seen that show - 26/08/2012 05:33:31 AM 1090 Views
As Legolas said, I think it is apprioriate - 26/08/2012 05:36:08 PM 924 Views
I'm really not in a position to judge, though obviously I'm inclined to disagree - 26/08/2012 05:41:49 PM 996 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 26/08/2012 05:47:36 PM 561 Views
i've got ten RAFOlk who testify they saw you punch babies, you should be stripped of posting here - 25/08/2012 04:09:53 PM 1023 Views
+1 - Anyone that thinks this isn't a sham/witch hunt is a moron. *NM* - 25/08/2012 04:23:55 PM 534 Views
You're not stupid, so I'm going to assume you know why your post is nonsense. - 26/08/2012 05:37:49 PM 919 Views
he will lose in arbitration, whether or not he is innocent. that's the point - 28/08/2012 03:55:38 PM 1074 Views
but he was the guy who had cancer - 26/08/2012 12:26:34 AM 1003 Views
I refer you to the Goldman dilema - 26/08/2012 05:41:26 PM 875 Views
but that's just dumb *NM* - 26/08/2012 10:23:34 PM 622 Views
Well - 27/08/2012 09:32:30 AM 1389 Views
On that first point - 27/08/2012 10:37:34 AM 1103 Views

Reply to Message