Active Users:204 Time:17/05/2024 12:24:11 PM
They can't reverse that call. Aemon Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM
From what I've heard the talking heads say, the rules don't allow reviewing who caught the ball; only whether it was a completion. So yes, they screwed up, but the rules prevented them from fixing their mistake after the fact.
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 635 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 629 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 598 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 391 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 679 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 500 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 735 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 685 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 677 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 582 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 851 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1197 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 653 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 696 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 709 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 653 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 330 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 797 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 345 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 565 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 766 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 764 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 678 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 602 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 770 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 672 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 617 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 705 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 657 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 738 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 717 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 452 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 362 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 331 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 632 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 335 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 568 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 659 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 619 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 309 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 302 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 707 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 516 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 945 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 936 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 631 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 756 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 626 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 805 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 847 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 665 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 678 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 948 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 743 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 570 Views

Reply to Message