Active Users:198 Time:17/05/2024 08:40:37 AM
It was very obviously caught; you can't rule that incomplete. Aemon Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 11:06:17 PM
They made a mistake calling the play a touchdown, but they did NOT make a mistake with the replay. They aren't allowed to review who caught the ball and they definitely aren't allowed to intentionally break the rules to make up for an earlier mistake.
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 635 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 629 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 598 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 391 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 679 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 500 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 735 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 685 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 677 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 582 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 851 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1197 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 653 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 696 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 709 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 653 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 330 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 797 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 345 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 565 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 766 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 764 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 678 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 602 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 770 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 672 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 617 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 705 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 657 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 737 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 717 Views
It was very obviously caught; you can't rule that incomplete. - 25/09/2012 11:06:17 PM 633 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 452 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 362 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 331 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 632 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 335 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 568 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 659 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 619 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 309 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 302 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 707 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 516 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 945 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 936 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 631 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 756 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 626 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 805 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 847 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 665 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 678 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 948 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 743 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 570 Views

Reply to Message