You might appreciate learning that the Lingerie Football League fired some of these refs
Larry Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 07:19:37 AM
Saw it on Deadspin, but I don't think it's a joke:
Because of the LFL's perception it is that much more critical for us to hire officiating crews that are competent, not only for the credibility of our game but to keep our athletes safer. Due to several on-field incompetent officiating we chose to part ways with with a couple crews which apparently are now officiating in the NFL. We have a lot of respect for our officials but we felt the officiating was not in line with our expectations.
We have not made public comment to date because we felt it was not our place to do so. However in light of tonight's event, we felt it was only fair that NFL fans knew the truth as to who are officiating these games.
Because of the LFL's perception it is that much more critical for us to hire officiating crews that are competent, not only for the credibility of our game but to keep our athletes safer. Due to several on-field incompetent officiating we chose to part ways with with a couple crews which apparently are now officiating in the NFL. We have a lot of respect for our officials but we felt the officiating was not in line with our expectations.
We have not made public comment to date because we felt it was not our place to do so. However in light of tonight's event, we felt it was only fair that NFL fans knew the truth as to who are officiating these games.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM
639 Views
Link? Clip?
- 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM
609 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM
394 Views
Here's a link.
- 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM
690 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post.
- 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM
508 Views
youtube link
- 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM
690 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD.
- 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM
592 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened
- 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM
861 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver.
- 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM
1206 Views
watch a better replay if you can
- 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM
662 Views
Have now; still not convinced.
- 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM
708 Views
*MN*
also, the pass interference on tate that wasn't called is clear at 0:56 in that clip
- 25/09/2012 11:27:36 AM
672 Views
Tate was looking for the ball, and raised his hands to catch it, not push off Sam Shields.
- 26/09/2012 01:33:46 AM
614 Views
watch a better replay and get back to me on this one.
- 26/09/2012 02:36:43 AM
661 Views
Where did the NFL head office acknowledge that?
- 26/09/2012 03:52:36 AM
765 Views
in their official response to the whole incident....?
- 26/09/2012 04:14:52 AM
894 Views
Fair enough then; the NFLs official position is that offensive PI should have been called.
- 26/09/2012 04:45:58 AM
664 Views
Yeah, if one hand counts as possession
- 25/09/2012 05:15:37 PM
688 Views
Left hand between Jennings' arms and on the ball; right was outside Jennings' arm and on the ball.
- 26/09/2012 01:38:28 AM
624 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM
333 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited.
- 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM
806 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees...
- 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM
776 Views
Now I really want to see this play.
- 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM
774 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play.
- 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM
689 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball.
- 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM
609 Views
You might appreciate learning that the Lingerie Football League fired some of these refs
- 25/09/2012 07:19:37 AM
687 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year
- 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM
714 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too.....
- 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM
663 Views
Possession doesn't mean squat until you land. Tate had it by then
- 25/09/2012 03:13:29 PM
668 Views
he had nothing until they landed and he tried to pull it away. everyone but you agrees on this *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:25:43 PM
324 Views
Not so; Cannoli and I agree on pretty much every point involved in this play.
- 26/09/2012 02:17:01 AM
637 Views
They can't reverse that call.
- 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM
749 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete
- 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM
728 Views
It was very obviously caught; you can't rule that incomplete.
- 25/09/2012 11:06:17 PM
644 Views
my philosophy is "interception = incomplete" but i think that's only for stats purposes
- 26/09/2012 12:32:43 AM
606 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM
455 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM*
- 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM
364 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM*
- 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM
334 Views
I have seen enough of it, and while I did not write Cannolis response, I easily could have.
- 26/09/2012 02:06:45 AM
656 Views
Slightly (very) loopy yet entertaining piece on why Ayn Rand is to blame for all of this.
- 25/09/2012 05:38:12 PM
584 Views
She hates revenue sharing, salary caps & the draft, too, but the Pack would be screwed without each.
- 26/09/2012 03:34:00 AM
610 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see
- 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM
714 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times.
- 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM
523 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it?
- 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM
955 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip.
- 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM
946 Views
you sure you saw the right replay?
- 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM
641 Views
Think so, yeah.
- 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM
767 Views
from another angle -- pun intended
- 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM
633 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip?
- 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM
816 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug*
- 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM
856 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily.
- 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM
677 Views
did you even read that article???
- 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM
689 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...."
- 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM
960 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me 
either way, you're still wrong 
- 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM
753 Views
either way, you're still wrong
- 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM
753 Views
Worst calls are made all the time by the regular officials.
- 26/09/2012 01:23:57 AM
624 Views
yes, but not usually more than one per game, certainly not several in a single weekend.... *NM*
- 26/09/2012 02:39:56 AM
341 Views