Active Users:558 Time:18/03/2026 05:47:13 PM
If it's shown to work TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 23/12/2012 12:25:38 AM
cost would be the main one. I don't know how many schools there are in the US, but having at least one armed police officer at every one? You're talking billions at the very least.

Another case where the level of justified public debate about gun violence strongly suggests the cost would be more than worth it.

The evidence based on events like Columbine suggests it wouldn't, if it doesn't then that's quite a waste of 10% of your education budget.

As I noted in response to Novo, the novel appearance of armed police in US high schools coincided suspiciously well with Columbine. So, no, armed police in high schools did not prevent Columbine for the very simple reason armed police were virtually non-existent in US high schools prior to Columbine. They became ubiquitous promptly thereafter, which may be part of why the Newtown shooter attacked an elementary rather than junior or high school.

It is difficult to imagine armed police at schools would not dramatically reduce the incidence of school shootings. The only question is whether the current frequency and mortality of school shootings justifies the expense of greatly reducing or completely preventing them. I believe we are past the point of debating that.


then it will be worth the money obviously, it's if it doesn't that people will question it on a cost basis and it is a hell of a punt on something that has only small amounts of evidence in it's favour.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
This message last edited by TheCrownless on 23/12/2012 at 12:31:55 AM
Reply to message
the NRA shows it is an asylum overrun by lunatics - 22/12/2012 04:40:26 PM 1442 Views
I do not see why calling for armed cops at schools is an unreasonable response. - 22/12/2012 04:53:06 PM 973 Views
I can think of two reasons off the top of my head - 22/12/2012 05:38:19 PM 977 Views
OK... - 22/12/2012 06:58:42 PM 962 Views
If someone is shooting at you having a gun to shoot back seems like a good idea - 26/12/2012 06:10:07 PM 811 Views
The effectiveness issue aside - 22/12/2012 06:13:30 PM 855 Views
Re: The effectiveness issue aside - 22/12/2012 06:59:36 PM 932 Views
If you think it would solve the debate then probably - 22/12/2012 07:09:42 PM 906 Views
Nothing will ever truly end the debate, but we can greatly reduce or end its justification. - 22/12/2012 08:03:39 PM 870 Views
If it's shown to work - 23/12/2012 12:25:38 AM 961 Views
columbine had two armed guards on the day of the shooting. they were both immediately fired upon... - 23/12/2012 12:49:30 AM 818 Views
I have never seen any mention of them among the injured or dead (or at all.) - 23/12/2012 01:09:38 AM 969 Views
A fuller account of Gardner - 23/12/2012 10:27:24 AM 1043 Views
Nice link. - 23/12/2012 02:27:30 PM 805 Views
Re: Nice link. - 23/12/2012 03:15:24 PM 823 Views
at last count, over 99,000 schools in the US - 23/12/2012 12:45:30 AM 904 Views
What is public safety worth to you? - 23/12/2012 12:54:04 AM 828 Views
it's not entirely a matter of cost, although that factors into it. - 23/12/2012 01:01:50 AM 744 Views
There are many cases where armed cops ended mass shootings. - 23/12/2012 01:28:25 AM 759 Views
there are none where an armed guard placed there *before* the shooting had any effect - 23/12/2012 01:36:42 AM 893 Views
Kind of a Catch-22; if they PREVENT shootings, shootings can only occur in their absence. - 23/12/2012 01:52:03 AM 937 Views
ok, here is my last word on the subject - 23/12/2012 02:06:49 AM 872 Views
9 people injured vs. 20 people dead. - 23/12/2012 02:34:00 AM 800 Views
it is still "more guns makes us safer" which has yet to prevent a single massacre in this country - 23/12/2012 02:41:56 PM 908 Views
Peter Odighizuwa comes to mind, that's also horrible logic - 23/12/2012 08:27:46 PM 815 Views
[citation needed] - 25/12/2012 04:54:14 PM 797 Views
Fair enough - 25/12/2012 09:06:43 PM 1176 Views
It doesn't have to be a full time gaurd standing looking dangerous. - 26/12/2012 06:12:14 PM 898 Views
People die from all sort of causes - 22/12/2012 07:27:53 PM 880 Views
Cars require training, certification and licensing, too; why should guns not? - 22/12/2012 08:25:43 PM 1004 Views
Do bombs require certification? - 22/12/2012 09:21:25 PM 1117 Views
i say this with all due respect -- eat a bag of dicks - 23/12/2012 01:04:08 AM 884 Views
That was pretty damn respectful under the circumstances. - 23/12/2012 01:10:04 AM 840 Views
The lack of intellect displayed here is to be expected - 23/12/2012 04:01:32 AM 865 Views
so according to you we should just make life illegal since everyone is going to die from something.. - 23/12/2012 07:25:05 AM 796 Views
Obviously you didn't put pay attention - 23/12/2012 01:40:17 PM 827 Views
no, you said "fuck it because people die anyway". there is a big difference - 23/12/2012 02:46:46 PM 766 Views
As usual, you are wrong on so many fronts... - 27/12/2012 10:39:04 PM 1093 Views
Dicks and stones - 23/12/2012 03:54:25 AM 1026 Views
FYI - I gave moondog a 30-day time-out via the ignore function. - 23/12/2012 05:48:13 AM 738 Views
FYI -- you didn't post to this board for 30+ days - 23/12/2012 07:21:44 AM 768 Views
I'm not sure it's about guns. - 23/12/2012 06:08:50 PM 818 Views

Reply to Message