Active Users:1077 Time:03/05/2026 12:21:53 AM
it is still "more guns makes us safer" which has yet to prevent a single massacre in this country moondog Send a noteboard - 23/12/2012 02:41:56 PM

If the suggestion has merit, wtf cares whence it came? But more importantly, when they propose something reasonable and you automatically attack it because of the source, it is YOU, not they, who sound like you are shilling for a personal agenda. Either the idea has merit or not (obviously I think it does) and that is the basis on which it should be addressed. Attacking it simply because it is the NRAs is a classic ad hominem beneath you.


if mother theresa says we need more guns to make us safer from homicidal lunatics with a small arsenal, maybe it would be a more serious response to such a tragedy. the NRA continues to insist that more and more people should have a gun, when the examples of australia, canada and scotland have shown that having limited access to guns actually works at preventing massacres. putting the twist on the suggestion that these new guns will be held by trained individuals does not change the fact that it is still "let's get even still more guns into peoples' hands". this is the only thing the NRA can suggest every time someone is killed in a public shooting spree, that we somehow could have prevented it if only there were more guns available to everyone. if the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, at some point the insanity must be recognized if we are going to get beyond the increasingly regular mass shootings.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
the NRA shows it is an asylum overrun by lunatics - 22/12/2012 04:40:26 PM 1465 Views
I do not see why calling for armed cops at schools is an unreasonable response. - 22/12/2012 04:53:06 PM 993 Views
I can think of two reasons off the top of my head - 22/12/2012 05:38:19 PM 998 Views
OK... - 22/12/2012 06:58:42 PM 982 Views
If someone is shooting at you having a gun to shoot back seems like a good idea - 26/12/2012 06:10:07 PM 831 Views
The effectiveness issue aside - 22/12/2012 06:13:30 PM 877 Views
Re: The effectiveness issue aside - 22/12/2012 06:59:36 PM 951 Views
If you think it would solve the debate then probably - 22/12/2012 07:09:42 PM 932 Views
Nothing will ever truly end the debate, but we can greatly reduce or end its justification. - 22/12/2012 08:03:39 PM 892 Views
If it's shown to work - 23/12/2012 12:25:38 AM 979 Views
columbine had two armed guards on the day of the shooting. they were both immediately fired upon... - 23/12/2012 12:49:30 AM 841 Views
I have never seen any mention of them among the injured or dead (or at all.) - 23/12/2012 01:09:38 AM 985 Views
A fuller account of Gardner - 23/12/2012 10:27:24 AM 1064 Views
Nice link. - 23/12/2012 02:27:30 PM 826 Views
Re: Nice link. - 23/12/2012 03:15:24 PM 843 Views
at last count, over 99,000 schools in the US - 23/12/2012 12:45:30 AM 923 Views
What is public safety worth to you? - 23/12/2012 12:54:04 AM 849 Views
it's not entirely a matter of cost, although that factors into it. - 23/12/2012 01:01:50 AM 760 Views
There are many cases where armed cops ended mass shootings. - 23/12/2012 01:28:25 AM 781 Views
there are none where an armed guard placed there *before* the shooting had any effect - 23/12/2012 01:36:42 AM 918 Views
Kind of a Catch-22; if they PREVENT shootings, shootings can only occur in their absence. - 23/12/2012 01:52:03 AM 957 Views
ok, here is my last word on the subject - 23/12/2012 02:06:49 AM 895 Views
9 people injured vs. 20 people dead. - 23/12/2012 02:34:00 AM 821 Views
it is still "more guns makes us safer" which has yet to prevent a single massacre in this country - 23/12/2012 02:41:56 PM 931 Views
Peter Odighizuwa comes to mind, that's also horrible logic - 23/12/2012 08:27:46 PM 836 Views
[citation needed] - 25/12/2012 04:54:14 PM 819 Views
Fair enough - 25/12/2012 09:06:43 PM 1196 Views
It doesn't have to be a full time gaurd standing looking dangerous. - 26/12/2012 06:12:14 PM 919 Views
People die from all sort of causes - 22/12/2012 07:27:53 PM 899 Views
Cars require training, certification and licensing, too; why should guns not? - 22/12/2012 08:25:43 PM 1023 Views
Do bombs require certification? - 22/12/2012 09:21:25 PM 1134 Views
i say this with all due respect -- eat a bag of dicks - 23/12/2012 01:04:08 AM 904 Views
That was pretty damn respectful under the circumstances. - 23/12/2012 01:10:04 AM 857 Views
The lack of intellect displayed here is to be expected - 23/12/2012 04:01:32 AM 886 Views
so according to you we should just make life illegal since everyone is going to die from something.. - 23/12/2012 07:25:05 AM 819 Views
Obviously you didn't put pay attention - 23/12/2012 01:40:17 PM 848 Views
no, you said "fuck it because people die anyway". there is a big difference - 23/12/2012 02:46:46 PM 793 Views
As usual, you are wrong on so many fronts... - 27/12/2012 10:39:04 PM 1114 Views
Dicks and stones - 23/12/2012 03:54:25 AM 1050 Views
FYI - I gave moondog a 30-day time-out via the ignore function. - 23/12/2012 05:48:13 AM 760 Views
FYI -- you didn't post to this board for 30+ days - 23/12/2012 07:21:44 AM 788 Views
I'm not sure it's about guns. - 23/12/2012 06:08:50 PM 835 Views

Reply to Message