Active Users:369 Time:17/06/2025 07:33:12 AM
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. Joel Send a noteboard - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM
The Second Amendment itself states its entire justification as "a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state." So there is every constitutional basis for regulating the HELL out of arms; they could even be made conditional on militia membership. Banning or confiscating guns would be totally unconstitutional, obviously, but regulating them is perfectly valid. Machine guns, for example, have been illegal without federal registration and permits for about 80 years, and no ones constitutional rights were violated.


learn the gramatical difference between dependant and independant clauses.

Just becasue the courts are allowing/endorsing it does not mean that it is right/correct/proper.

If I said, "you keep bringing this up, so clearly do not grasp the logic," the first (grammmatically dependent) clause would not be irrelevant to the second (grammatically independent) one. Learn what "because" means; it is basic causality: The right of the people to keep and bear arms is CAUSED by the the need for a well regulated militia. According to the Second Amendments plain text, the right to keep and bear arms is baseless without the need for a well regulated militia.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them? - 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM 1676 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer - 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM 1099 Views
You're actually not right on that one - 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM 1034 Views
That wasn't the point I was making - 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM 963 Views
You should probably clarify it then - 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM 1130 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post. - 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM 1292 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM* - 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM 574 Views
I think - 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM 960 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle' - 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM 975 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith - 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM 1031 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM 985 Views
Re: I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 11:25:04 PM 1039 Views
Oh I wasn't commenting on the standard of people here - 21/12/2012 11:29:36 PM 972 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se - 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM 942 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense - 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM 1014 Views
He is right about Australia - 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM 972 Views
No kidding - 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM 978 Views
If you knew all that - 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM 1016 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant. - 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM 965 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets. - 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM 1027 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns? - 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM 1195 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM 909 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM 961 Views
umm... - 22/12/2012 12:41:31 PM 863 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout - 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM 1050 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed - 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM 1103 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM 609 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification. - 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM 917 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM* - 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM 527 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution. - 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM 1028 Views
Yes you are. - 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM 854 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM 1000 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to - 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM 1039 Views
You are wrong. - 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM 994 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it. - 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM 951 Views
We're also averse to being wrong. - 22/12/2012 02:53:49 PM 999 Views
So you say... - 22/12/2012 03:32:16 PM 922 Views
guns r stpid *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:39:30 AM 691 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns - 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM 988 Views
She was asleep with him in the house. - 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM 1011 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one... - 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM 929 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd. - 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM 929 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time... - 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM 907 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers. - 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM 910 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM* - 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM 570 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...." - 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM 907 Views
*see previous grammar lesson* *NM* - 28/12/2012 10:31:43 PM 533 Views
The instant it becomes relevant, I shall. - 28/12/2012 11:45:01 PM 1109 Views
Your point being? - 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM 908 Views
Facts are irrelevant when FUD is the order of the day. - 24/12/2012 04:34:18 PM 901 Views
It irritates me too. *NM* - 01/01/2013 01:55:05 PM 563 Views

Reply to Message