Active Users:1030 Time:02/05/2026 10:45:09 PM
As usual, you are wrong on so many fronts... HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 27/12/2012 10:39:04 PM
hey, people die from falling off a ladder, we obviously need stronger ladder regulations. after all, the only purpose of ladders is to kill people in mass quantities. :rolleyes:


I was saying how silly it is to ban guns because of the very small number of gun related deaths in this country. Pay attention.


30,000 gun deaths is not a small number, and is on par with the number of people killed in car crashes every year. but yet you have to go through some sort of training to drive, and you have to pay licensing fees to keep your car. to buy a gun, you just have to be old enough and able to pass a background check. there is no mandatory training and no requirement to renew your license unless you have a conceal permit. considering that the only purpose of a gun is to kill indiscriminately, you'd think we could find a way to make them *less* accessible to the general public, or at the very least require enough training that people who just want to kill someone will find a less efficient method.


- 30,000 in a country of 311 million is statistically small.

- There is no Constitutional protection regarding driving a car, but there is for owning one which does NOT require a permit or license.

- Guns are intended to kill discriminately, bombs kill indiscriminately. A gun that kills indiscriminately is useless.

- Guns are incredibly inefficient for killing large numbers of people, which is why the military uses explosives (missiles, gravity bombs, artillery, mortars, claymores, etc.). Explosives, poisons, and incindiary devices can be constructed from the contents of the average home quite easily.

The only difference between the efficiency of a gun and my hand (or the hand of a child, yes even a child can crush a larynx) is that the gun can kill at a distance, but so can a knife, and a bow.
Reply to message
the NRA shows it is an asylum overrun by lunatics - 22/12/2012 04:40:26 PM 1463 Views
I do not see why calling for armed cops at schools is an unreasonable response. - 22/12/2012 04:53:06 PM 991 Views
I can think of two reasons off the top of my head - 22/12/2012 05:38:19 PM 998 Views
OK... - 22/12/2012 06:58:42 PM 982 Views
If someone is shooting at you having a gun to shoot back seems like a good idea - 26/12/2012 06:10:07 PM 830 Views
The effectiveness issue aside - 22/12/2012 06:13:30 PM 877 Views
Re: The effectiveness issue aside - 22/12/2012 06:59:36 PM 951 Views
If you think it would solve the debate then probably - 22/12/2012 07:09:42 PM 932 Views
Nothing will ever truly end the debate, but we can greatly reduce or end its justification. - 22/12/2012 08:03:39 PM 891 Views
If it's shown to work - 23/12/2012 12:25:38 AM 978 Views
columbine had two armed guards on the day of the shooting. they were both immediately fired upon... - 23/12/2012 12:49:30 AM 840 Views
I have never seen any mention of them among the injured or dead (or at all.) - 23/12/2012 01:09:38 AM 985 Views
A fuller account of Gardner - 23/12/2012 10:27:24 AM 1064 Views
Nice link. - 23/12/2012 02:27:30 PM 826 Views
Re: Nice link. - 23/12/2012 03:15:24 PM 842 Views
at last count, over 99,000 schools in the US - 23/12/2012 12:45:30 AM 920 Views
What is public safety worth to you? - 23/12/2012 12:54:04 AM 848 Views
it's not entirely a matter of cost, although that factors into it. - 23/12/2012 01:01:50 AM 760 Views
There are many cases where armed cops ended mass shootings. - 23/12/2012 01:28:25 AM 781 Views
there are none where an armed guard placed there *before* the shooting had any effect - 23/12/2012 01:36:42 AM 918 Views
Kind of a Catch-22; if they PREVENT shootings, shootings can only occur in their absence. - 23/12/2012 01:52:03 AM 957 Views
ok, here is my last word on the subject - 23/12/2012 02:06:49 AM 894 Views
9 people injured vs. 20 people dead. - 23/12/2012 02:34:00 AM 821 Views
it is still "more guns makes us safer" which has yet to prevent a single massacre in this country - 23/12/2012 02:41:56 PM 928 Views
Peter Odighizuwa comes to mind, that's also horrible logic - 23/12/2012 08:27:46 PM 835 Views
[citation needed] - 25/12/2012 04:54:14 PM 817 Views
Fair enough - 25/12/2012 09:06:43 PM 1195 Views
It doesn't have to be a full time gaurd standing looking dangerous. - 26/12/2012 06:12:14 PM 919 Views
People die from all sort of causes - 22/12/2012 07:27:53 PM 896 Views
Cars require training, certification and licensing, too; why should guns not? - 22/12/2012 08:25:43 PM 1023 Views
Do bombs require certification? - 22/12/2012 09:21:25 PM 1134 Views
i say this with all due respect -- eat a bag of dicks - 23/12/2012 01:04:08 AM 904 Views
That was pretty damn respectful under the circumstances. - 23/12/2012 01:10:04 AM 857 Views
The lack of intellect displayed here is to be expected - 23/12/2012 04:01:32 AM 885 Views
so according to you we should just make life illegal since everyone is going to die from something.. - 23/12/2012 07:25:05 AM 819 Views
Obviously you didn't put pay attention - 23/12/2012 01:40:17 PM 847 Views
no, you said "fuck it because people die anyway". there is a big difference - 23/12/2012 02:46:46 PM 792 Views
As usual, you are wrong on so many fronts... - 27/12/2012 10:39:04 PM 1112 Views
Dicks and stones - 23/12/2012 03:54:25 AM 1047 Views
FYI - I gave moondog a 30-day time-out via the ignore function. - 23/12/2012 05:48:13 AM 757 Views
FYI -- you didn't post to this board for 30+ days - 23/12/2012 07:21:44 AM 788 Views
I'm not sure it's about guns. - 23/12/2012 06:08:50 PM 835 Views

Reply to Message