Active Users:742 Time:04/02/2026 09:58:31 PM
Re: Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 02/03/2013 12:22:34 PM

View original post1) Fraudulent (or WAS not until St. Ronnie started looting it to pay for tax cuts so large he STILL tripled federal debt)

It is "fraudulent" because the money contributed is NOT invested for the contributor, but instead redistributed to others, and SS receipts were placed in the General fund in the 70s long before Regan was elected.
View original post2) pays beneficiaries with their employers money as well as their own and that of later investors.

The source of the money is not relevant.



View original postMany die before receiving benefits, and many more are born and enter the workforce. Ponzis fail because they run out of revenue sources once all or most people join, but SS does not, because the number paying in doubles every few decades, and a huge swathe of them do not live long enough to collect.

So, you think it is "good" because it steals dead people's money to stay solvent... That is an odd position to try to defend. Ponzi's fail because the math does not work, Social Security has only survived this long because it pays such a lousy return.
View original postSeriously, guys, Rick Perrys a moron, but ya'll do not have that "excuse." :[

At least he understands the definitions of the words used in the English language, and can do 3rd grade math, both of which seem to be beyond you.
Reply to message
Can You Name the Largest US Program to ANNUALLY Collect More Than It Spent for 75 Straight Years? - 28/02/2013 11:03:18 PM 1524 Views
It's the world's greatest Ponzi scheme, since the government forces us to give money to it. - 01/03/2013 01:05:05 PM 961 Views
Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis. - 01/03/2013 03:53:02 PM 1050 Views
Good lord my friend..... - 02/03/2013 04:19:35 AM 983 Views
I will just link what Isaac said; maybe then you will pay attention to it. - 02/03/2013 04:56:34 AM 1044 Views
I really think you terribly misread what I said *NM* - 02/03/2013 06:59:56 AM 535 Views
Yes he did. He has very poor reading comprehension skills. *NM* - 03/03/2013 01:07:59 AM 556 Views
I really do not think I did. - 04/03/2013 01:43:02 AM 1080 Views
I'm pretty confident you have - 04/03/2013 11:49:19 AM 1050 Views
We evidently disagree on what constitutes a Ponzi scheme. - 11/03/2013 09:56:27 PM 974 Views
No, I agree with a clear definiton, you seem not to want to absorb that - 11/03/2013 10:24:47 PM 1168 Views
It is neither an investment nor fraudulent. - 12/03/2013 02:34:09 AM 1214 Views
Re: Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis. - 02/03/2013 12:22:34 PM 1044 Views
Okay, that's a really weird or naive standard to judge SS by - 01/03/2013 05:25:11 PM 993 Views
Great; will you put that on a postcard to Cannoli, A2K, Rick Perry and the rest of your party? - 01/03/2013 07:39:44 PM 1034 Views
Your attacks on republican ideals would have more credit if you understood them - 02/03/2013 04:27:34 AM 1026 Views
aH yes the great liberal investmetn/retirement plan that offers me a NEGATIGVE rate of return... - 02/03/2013 11:51:50 AM 953 Views
Do you sincerely believe people earning $14,560/year can afford investing 4% of it? - 04/03/2013 12:53:30 AM 1113 Views
*sigh* - 04/03/2013 03:43:08 AM 933 Views
I tried it with compound interest; $44.80/month at 4% for 50 years still does not get to $1.25 mill. - 04/03/2013 04:24:51 AM 981 Views
Here are some clues. - 04/03/2013 04:37:39 AM 865 Views
It is math, not the Riddle of the Sphinx: EIther it adds up or does not. - 04/03/2013 05:02:39 AM 998 Views
Math is simple - Either you know how to calculate it or you don't - 04/03/2013 11:55:24 AM 1121 Views
Indeed. - 11/03/2013 09:53:59 PM 1041 Views
Re: Indeed. - 13/03/2013 05:00:10 PM 1165 Views
SS is supposed to supplement a proper pension, not provide your sole income after retirement - 05/03/2013 03:53:03 AM 884 Views
Did you bother to actually read anything? - 05/03/2013 02:32:16 PM 951 Views
do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? - 05/03/2013 05:49:14 PM 1049 Views
Re: do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? --- yeah, I've BEEN there. - 05/03/2013 08:01:33 PM 968 Views
how about respond to a post with logic and civility instead of being a troll for once? - 05/03/2013 11:03:00 PM 1094 Views
All I have used is civility and logic, or least as much civility as was warrented. - 06/03/2013 04:28:04 AM 1032 Views
yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 08/03/2013 07:22:24 PM 1073 Views
Re: yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 10/03/2013 01:42:26 PM 945 Views
i'm not going to keep going in circles so i will finish with this.... - 11/03/2013 10:08:53 PM 1255 Views
No loss. - 13/03/2013 04:37:41 PM 892 Views
"Rah! Rah! Rah!" Can we please cut out all this blather and bile? - 05/03/2013 11:53:41 PM 957 Views
spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 06/03/2013 12:54:38 AM 913 Views
Re: spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 08/03/2013 03:04:37 PM 973 Views
I was not trolling, but clarifying. - 11/03/2013 09:53:48 PM 1023 Views

Reply to Message