Active Users:751 Time:04/02/2026 09:49:11 PM
"Unsustainable"=/="meeting monthly obligations for 75 YEARS and still having $2.5 trillion left." Joel Send a noteboard - 04/03/2013 01:03:09 AM

View original post
Now that we have descended to kindergarten level can we stop with the name calling and have a rational discussion?

So you tell me whether we can have a rational discussion, or must instead debate whether a plan that paid its legally mandated return each month for three-quarters of a century, with more than the GDP of Britain to spare, is a "Ponzi scheme." If you want to talk about ways to improve it, I am all for that, but as long entitlement "reform" is just code for specious excuses to abolish SS as unsustainable, that discussion is impossible. Note: Saying I cannot do third grade math is NOT a good way to avoid descent to kindergarten level. ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Can You Name the Largest US Program to ANNUALLY Collect More Than It Spent for 75 Straight Years? - 28/02/2013 11:03:18 PM 1524 Views
It's the world's greatest Ponzi scheme, since the government forces us to give money to it. - 01/03/2013 01:05:05 PM 960 Views
Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis. - 01/03/2013 03:53:02 PM 1050 Views
Good lord my friend..... - 02/03/2013 04:19:35 AM 982 Views
I will just link what Isaac said; maybe then you will pay attention to it. - 02/03/2013 04:56:34 AM 1043 Views
I really think you terribly misread what I said *NM* - 02/03/2013 06:59:56 AM 535 Views
Yes he did. He has very poor reading comprehension skills. *NM* - 03/03/2013 01:07:59 AM 556 Views
I really do not think I did. - 04/03/2013 01:43:02 AM 1079 Views
I'm pretty confident you have - 04/03/2013 11:49:19 AM 1049 Views
We evidently disagree on what constitutes a Ponzi scheme. - 11/03/2013 09:56:27 PM 974 Views
No, I agree with a clear definiton, you seem not to want to absorb that - 11/03/2013 10:24:47 PM 1168 Views
It is neither an investment nor fraudulent. - 12/03/2013 02:34:09 AM 1214 Views
Okay, that's a really weird or naive standard to judge SS by - 01/03/2013 05:25:11 PM 993 Views
Great; will you put that on a postcard to Cannoli, A2K, Rick Perry and the rest of your party? - 01/03/2013 07:39:44 PM 1034 Views
Your attacks on republican ideals would have more credit if you understood them - 02/03/2013 04:27:34 AM 1025 Views
An ironic charge, since their defenses of those ideals typically suffer from the same defect. - 02/03/2013 04:51:32 AM 979 Views
I'm rubber you're glue, whatever you say bounces of me and sticks to you. nyah, nyah, nyah - 02/03/2013 12:58:10 PM 923 Views
"Unsustainable"=/="meeting monthly obligations for 75 YEARS and still having $2.5 trillion left." - 04/03/2013 01:03:09 AM 1058 Views
Ironic that you would make my point while arguing against - 04/03/2013 06:12:29 PM 899 Views
? - 11/03/2013 09:56:59 PM 1063 Views
aH yes the great liberal investmetn/retirement plan that offers me a NEGATIGVE rate of return... - 02/03/2013 11:51:50 AM 952 Views
Do you sincerely believe people earning $14,560/year can afford investing 4% of it? - 04/03/2013 12:53:30 AM 1112 Views
*sigh* - 04/03/2013 03:43:08 AM 933 Views
I tried it with compound interest; $44.80/month at 4% for 50 years still does not get to $1.25 mill. - 04/03/2013 04:24:51 AM 981 Views
Here are some clues. - 04/03/2013 04:37:39 AM 865 Views
It is math, not the Riddle of the Sphinx: EIther it adds up or does not. - 04/03/2013 05:02:39 AM 998 Views
Math is simple - Either you know how to calculate it or you don't - 04/03/2013 11:55:24 AM 1120 Views
Indeed. - 11/03/2013 09:53:59 PM 1041 Views
Re: Indeed. - 13/03/2013 05:00:10 PM 1165 Views
SS is supposed to supplement a proper pension, not provide your sole income after retirement - 05/03/2013 03:53:03 AM 883 Views
Did you bother to actually read anything? - 05/03/2013 02:32:16 PM 950 Views
do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? - 05/03/2013 05:49:14 PM 1047 Views
Re: do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? --- yeah, I've BEEN there. - 05/03/2013 08:01:33 PM 967 Views
how about respond to a post with logic and civility instead of being a troll for once? - 05/03/2013 11:03:00 PM 1093 Views
All I have used is civility and logic, or least as much civility as was warrented. - 06/03/2013 04:28:04 AM 1032 Views
yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 08/03/2013 07:22:24 PM 1073 Views
Re: yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 10/03/2013 01:42:26 PM 945 Views
i'm not going to keep going in circles so i will finish with this.... - 11/03/2013 10:08:53 PM 1255 Views
No loss. - 13/03/2013 04:37:41 PM 892 Views
"Rah! Rah! Rah!" Can we please cut out all this blather and bile? - 05/03/2013 11:53:41 PM 956 Views
spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 06/03/2013 12:54:38 AM 911 Views
Re: spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 08/03/2013 03:04:37 PM 973 Views
I was not trolling, but clarifying. - 11/03/2013 09:53:48 PM 1022 Views

Reply to Message