Active Users:1156 Time:28/01/2026 11:48:56 AM
um, that's actually EXACTLY how natural selection works, thanks for arguing my point so nicely moondog Send a noteboard - 10/06/2015 12:19:32 AM

View original post
View original post
witness a species of swallow found in nebraska which has been shown to have a shorter wingspan, thus allowing it to dodge cars more effectively over the course of 30 years. shorter-winged birds managed to survive and breed, and now they don't get splattered by cars nearly as often as they used to. if that isn't rock solid proof that evolutionary theory is perfectly sound and valid, then i don't know what is....

I broke my usual rule of not clicking a moondog link, since they never ever claim support his point, and looked at the article. This is people who want to believe in evolution simply claiming, absent proof, that their god has intervened to save the birds. In fact, it's OUR God who pays attention to their deaths. He said so.

Birds have not changed. The preexisting characteristics of a species has altered in proportion. If snipers started shooting everyone over six feet tall, the proportion of humans under six feet tall in that area would increase. It would not change the characteristics of human biology or, even if all the tall people were eradicated from the breeding pool, and their genes combed out through successive generations, that humans had changed species. People have managed to INTELLIGENTLY DESIGN varieties of dog from Chihuahua to Great Dane, but they are all canis lupus familiaris. Your evolved swallows are still swallows, and when removed from the environment that selects for short wings, their proportions will go right back to normal.

If YOU were familiar with Charles Darwin's work, you would note that this is essentially the exact same phenomenon he observed with the Galapagos finches. Subsequent studies revealed that their beaks revert back to the normal range in different climates. This is not remotely evidence of speciation. It would be an interesting phenomenon to study on its own merit, but not as the basis for a work called "Origin of Species."


yeah that's actually how the process works. since you understand it so well are you just arguing with me because it's me and you are 100% against what i say even when i'm right, or because you think you're actually in disagreement with the principle? if you're in disagreement so much that i'm an idiot for presenting a case exactly as the process you've described, then you are also an idiot for believing that natural selection chooses the birds that are better at surviving the dive out of an overpass without getting hit by cars. and if those birds move to some other place, their bodies will change to be more adapted to the other environment. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THE ARTICLE SUGGESTS, AND EVOLUTIONARY THEORY SUPPORTS IS HAPPENING! so either you agree that evolution works as presented, or you don't agree even though you do. should i re-submit it under a different login so that you can read it without automatically filing it under "must disagree because moondog wrote it"?

"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Can liberals all stop their posturing about adhering to science? - 05/06/2015 12:04:13 AM 1384 Views
It's not really a difficult concept to understand, man - 05/06/2015 02:23:34 PM 795 Views
Re: It's not really a difficult concept to understand, man - 05/06/2015 09:05:03 PM 808 Views
It's so difficult to parse out your trolling sometimes - 07/06/2015 02:37:11 PM 801 Views
Some people feel like they are women, though born as men. So they take steps to live - 05/06/2015 04:47:14 PM 793 Views
I agree with you in theory - 05/06/2015 09:43:43 PM 673 Views
I think it's okay to be weirded out by it - 08/06/2015 10:28:02 PM 806 Views
gender issues aside the evidence of evolution is undeniable to the extreme - 05/06/2015 08:37:37 PM 669 Views
Well then why do scientists feel the need to make up their own fake evidence? - 05/06/2015 09:16:40 PM 717 Views
The specifics and our understanding always changes - 05/06/2015 09:50:39 PM 717 Views
"A better fit" doesn't sound much like testable hypotheses and observable data - 06/06/2015 12:38:49 AM 861 Views
Science and absolute, unquestioned fact... - 06/06/2015 11:16:10 AM 756 Views
The theory is refined that is all - 08/06/2015 07:11:40 PM 715 Views
We can find Naederthal DNA in modern humans - 08/06/2015 07:01:01 PM 662 Views
I am 3% Neanderthal! My 23andMe Test told me so!! *NM* - 08/06/2015 08:07:35 PM 376 Views
If thought about doing that - 09/06/2015 02:31:11 PM 658 Views
...I'm confused, are you claiming that no real fossils have been found? - 07/06/2015 02:41:12 PM 683 Views
And they prove what, exactly? - 07/06/2015 11:24:43 PM 802 Views
Er, well yeah, that's the point- Scientific knowledge keeps growing and challenging itself - 08/06/2015 02:58:26 PM 740 Views
It's not at all the same. - 09/06/2015 02:53:06 PM 700 Views
In fact, fossils are not even necessary sometimes -- we can see it over the course of generations - 08/06/2015 09:06:23 PM 737 Views
That's not evolution, idiot. - 09/06/2015 02:31:27 PM 685 Views
um, that's actually EXACTLY how natural selection works, thanks for arguing my point so nicely - 10/06/2015 12:19:32 AM 675 Views
I would not have expected to see you adhere to a scientist position - 07/06/2015 03:06:11 AM 747 Views
I am not; I am criticizing the people who apply it inconsistently - 07/06/2015 11:14:05 PM 781 Views
Perhaps she does not believe in hell - 08/06/2015 12:55:50 PM 610 Views
can republicans stop their posturing about adhering to morality? - 08/06/2015 09:17:16 PM 714 Views
My own homosexual inclinations would not constitute hypocrisy in opposing deviant behavior - 09/06/2015 02:14:56 PM 709 Views
"… in the latter times some shall depart from the faith… speaking lies in hypocrisy…" - 15/06/2015 03:36:08 AM 760 Views
See - more liberal doublespeak - 15/06/2015 03:30:57 PM 723 Views
“Who are you calling, ‘you people’?! - 17/06/2015 10:08:32 AM 659 Views
Some other stuff - 15/06/2015 03:45:59 PM 742 Views
See what you (and the devil, of course) made me do? - 17/06/2015 10:16:35 AM 752 Views
I find this entire discussion absolutely hilarious. - 15/06/2015 04:19:31 PM 582 Views
well I am sucb a died in the wool liberal I just cant help myself - 15/06/2015 06:25:57 PM 573 Views
Yeah, you're to the Left of Trotsky. *NM* - 15/06/2015 07:31:28 PM 343 Views
...what? Attacking points is pretty much what debate IS. - 16/06/2015 04:29:05 AM 660 Views
No... - 17/06/2015 08:00:57 PM 633 Views
OK? - 18/06/2015 04:03:32 AM 665 Views
duplicate post, ignore *NM* - 18/06/2015 04:03:47 AM 431 Views
Oh, I'm sorry. - 18/06/2015 09:05:42 PM 734 Views
A thesis delayed till the SECOND paragraph is, at best, misplaced - 20/06/2015 09:37:36 AM 712 Views
Bah, damn you for good points! - 21/06/2015 09:33:49 PM 722 Views
Oh, man, been there, done that, got the T-shirt - 22/06/2015 01:26:13 AM 667 Views
Heheh, thank you for understanding. - 22/06/2015 09:23:11 PM 641 Views
Re: Oh, I'm sorry. - 20/06/2015 04:44:24 PM 812 Views
You're missing my whole issue with labeling. - 21/06/2015 09:32:36 PM 732 Views
This might be a complete non-sequitur, but... - 21/06/2015 10:38:19 PM 598 Views
I'm a hardcore lurker... - 22/06/2015 09:26:59 PM 564 Views
Cool. - 22/06/2015 10:14:45 PM 655 Views
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JFfN5pKzFU *NM* - 15/06/2015 05:01:30 PM 344 Views

Reply to Message