View original postAs a huge lurker on the WoTMB, and enjoying Cannoli's "Egwene's Evil" series, seeing this thread by Cannoli piqued my interest, and then seeing the sheer amount of diversions and labels slapped on people caused me to become rather more annoyed than I normally get, and annoyance urges me to speak out.
Fair enough.
View original postI, personally, wouldn't put any money on you seeing any more posts from me on the CMB, and wouldn't put much on seeing me on the WoTMB.
Shame, we could use more new voices. And you seem more inclined to share your thoughts at length than a typical lurker would - even to the point of putting that place marker in reply to Joel.

Can liberals all stop their posturing about adhering to science?
05/06/2015 12:04:13 AM
- 1321 Views
It's not really a difficult concept to understand, man
05/06/2015 02:23:34 PM
- 727 Views
Some people feel like they are women, though born as men. So they take steps to live
05/06/2015 04:47:14 PM
- 727 Views
The issue is science, and you respond with ...feelings? The point called, and it misses you too.
05/06/2015 09:31:09 PM
- 747 Views
Are you seriously claiming your post is motivated by science?
05/06/2015 10:39:01 PM
- 599 Views
No, by hypocrites citing science as a trump card when it suits them & ignoring it on other issues
06/06/2015 12:33:53 AM
- 726 Views
If you want to accuse liberals of ignoring science there so many better examples
09/06/2015 04:35:58 PM
- 727 Views
gender issues aside the evidence of evolution is undeniable to the extreme
05/06/2015 08:37:37 PM
- 610 Views
Well then why do scientists feel the need to make up their own fake evidence?
05/06/2015 09:16:40 PM
- 642 Views
The specifics and our understanding always changes
05/06/2015 09:50:39 PM
- 654 Views
"A better fit" doesn't sound much like testable hypotheses and observable data
06/06/2015 12:38:49 AM
- 791 Views
Science and absolute, unquestioned fact...
06/06/2015 11:16:10 AM
- 666 Views
The theory is refined that is all
08/06/2015 07:11:40 PM
- 647 Views
Refined is probably a better word for it (though some can be overturned)
09/06/2015 08:47:22 AM
- 637 Views
We can find Naederthal DNA in modern humans
08/06/2015 07:01:01 PM
- 593 Views
We share 1/3 of the DNA of flowers. Where are those in our ancestral tree?
09/06/2015 02:20:46 PM
- 620 Views
Americas (Christian?!) "accepted religious standards" can and have been changed to vindicate robbers
15/06/2015 03:37:12 AM
- 602 Views
So? My point is that liberals would not allow you to teach that in a public school
15/06/2015 01:43:43 PM
- 536 Views
Liberals consistently teach that in schools, despite conservatives calling it “revisionist history”
17/06/2015 10:00:48 AM
- 646 Views
The problem with the "there can not spontanous life" argument is
15/06/2015 02:29:06 PM
- 588 Views
"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
17/06/2015 10:02:00 AM
- 604 Views
will since omnipotent beings are ut side the realm of the possible we can eliminate that
17/06/2015 05:45:36 PM
- 670 Views
Who says omnipotent beings are outside the realm of possibility?
20/06/2015 03:59:44 AM
- 719 Views
You can always find unaswered question in science but that gives no weight to religion
22/06/2015 01:52:25 PM
- 585 Views
...I'm confused, are you claiming that no real fossils have been found?
07/06/2015 02:41:12 PM
- 616 Views
And they prove what, exactly?
07/06/2015 11:24:43 PM
- 732 Views
Er, well yeah, that's the point- Scientific knowledge keeps growing and challenging itself
08/06/2015 02:58:26 PM
- 670 Views
It's not at all the same.
09/06/2015 02:53:06 PM
- 630 Views
Dude, you're monologuing like a supervillain and going off on insane tangents.
09/06/2015 03:27:37 PM
- 733 Views
In fact, fossils are not even necessary sometimes -- we can see it over the course of generations
08/06/2015 09:06:23 PM
- 655 Views
That's not evolution, idiot.
09/06/2015 02:31:27 PM
- 608 Views
um, that's actually EXACTLY how natural selection works, thanks for arguing my point so nicely
10/06/2015 12:19:32 AM
- 609 Views
They're not changing. Same species, same characteristics. We're just finding different proportions.
13/06/2015 05:35:09 PM
- 554 Views
"It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
15/06/2015 03:36:42 AM
- 553 Views
Re: "It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
15/06/2015 02:23:36 PM
- 614 Views
I would not have expected to see you adhere to a scientist position
07/06/2015 03:06:11 AM
- 686 Views
I am not; I am criticizing the people who apply it inconsistently
07/06/2015 11:14:05 PM
- 715 Views
You are confusing science and scientism
08/06/2015 10:15:57 PM
- 605 Views
For what it is worth, I have encountered many people who satisfy those stated "scientism" criteria
15/06/2015 03:37:36 AM
- 567 Views
can republicans stop their posturing about adhering to morality?
08/06/2015 09:17:16 PM
- 633 Views
My own homosexual inclinations would not constitute hypocrisy in opposing deviant behavior
09/06/2015 02:14:56 PM
- 637 Views
at least you're finally open about your homosexual attraction to the former Bruce Jenner...
10/06/2015 12:05:10 AM
- 740 Views

"… in the latter times some shall depart from the faith… speaking lies in hypocrisy…"
15/06/2015 03:36:08 AM
- 687 Views
Good luck with that; (at least) two beloved long time RAFOlk are post-medically transgendered
15/06/2015 03:34:33 AM
- 503 Views
I find this entire discussion absolutely hilarious.
15/06/2015 04:19:31 PM
- 514 Views
well I am sucb a died in the wool liberal I just cant help myself
15/06/2015 06:25:57 PM
- 513 Views
...what? Attacking points is pretty much what debate IS.
16/06/2015 04:29:05 AM
- 575 Views
No...
17/06/2015 08:00:57 PM
- 564 Views
OK?
18/06/2015 04:03:32 AM
- 587 Views
Oh, I'm sorry.
18/06/2015 09:05:42 PM
- 659 Views
A thesis delayed till the SECOND paragraph is, at best, misplaced
20/06/2015 09:37:36 AM
- 642 Views
Bah, damn you for good points!
21/06/2015 09:33:49 PM
- 652 Views
The really fun part is when grammatical gender doesn't match the sex even for humans.
22/06/2015 10:30:33 PM
- 551 Views
"Mädchen" was my initial reference, changed because I think Spanish more accessible to Americans
24/06/2015 04:42:37 AM
- 619 Views

Re: Oh, I'm sorry.
20/06/2015 04:44:24 PM
- 718 Views
You're missing my whole issue with labeling.
21/06/2015 09:32:36 PM
- 657 Views
Had this post been the thread-starter it would have drawn far fewer complaints
24/06/2015 04:41:06 AM
- 907 Views
The sheer brazenness of the "calling bigots 'bigots' is offensive" "defense" continually amazes me
20/06/2015 04:03:46 AM
- 841 Views
This might be a complete non-sequitur, but...
21/06/2015 10:38:19 PM
- 531 Views
I'm a hardcore lurker...
22/06/2015 09:26:59 PM
- 488 Views
Cool.
22/06/2015 10:14:45 PM
- 586 Views