The really fun part is when grammatical gender doesn't match the sex even for humans.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 22/06/2015 10:30:33 PM
View original postAlso, his thesis ignored the distinction between gender and sex, which is curious, because I suspect he is sufficiently familiar with foreign languages to be well aware of it. In a sense, one could argue the difference between APPEARANCE or USAGE and NATURE is exactly the difference. To take an example many Americans would recognize, "el pollo" is Spanish for "the chicken" and "la gallina" for "the hen." Of course, a hen is both a chicken and one of the female variety, but if one were to reference a hen generically in Spanish as a chicken it would NOT be correct to say, "la pollo," because the word "pollo" is NEVER of feminine gender even though hens are EXCLUSIVELY SO. By accident or design, the term transGENDER is precisely accurate.
Especially in German, where both Mädchen (girl) and Fräulein (Miss) are grammatically neutral, and consequently the only correct way of referring to them is with "es" ("it" ). My own Dutch is similar but a little more flexible and tends to go with the sensible but grammatically incoherent alternative of referring to them with a feminine pronoun.
This message last edited by Legolas on 22/06/2015 at 10:30:42 PM
Can liberals all stop their posturing about adhering to science?
05/06/2015 12:04:13 AM
- 1305 Views
It's not really a difficult concept to understand, man
05/06/2015 02:23:34 PM
- 715 Views
Some people feel like they are women, though born as men. So they take steps to live
05/06/2015 04:47:14 PM
- 709 Views
The issue is science, and you respond with ...feelings? The point called, and it misses you too.
05/06/2015 09:31:09 PM
- 730 Views
Are you seriously claiming your post is motivated by science?
05/06/2015 10:39:01 PM
- 587 Views
No, by hypocrites citing science as a trump card when it suits them & ignoring it on other issues
06/06/2015 12:33:53 AM
- 711 Views
If you want to accuse liberals of ignoring science there so many better examples
09/06/2015 04:35:58 PM
- 712 Views
gender issues aside the evidence of evolution is undeniable to the extreme
05/06/2015 08:37:37 PM
- 594 Views
Well then why do scientists feel the need to make up their own fake evidence?
05/06/2015 09:16:40 PM
- 628 Views
The specifics and our understanding always changes
05/06/2015 09:50:39 PM
- 636 Views
"A better fit" doesn't sound much like testable hypotheses and observable data
06/06/2015 12:38:49 AM
- 775 Views
Science and absolute, unquestioned fact...
06/06/2015 11:16:10 AM
- 648 Views
The theory is refined that is all
08/06/2015 07:11:40 PM
- 629 Views
Refined is probably a better word for it (though some can be overturned)
09/06/2015 08:47:22 AM
- 623 Views
We can find Naederthal DNA in modern humans
08/06/2015 07:01:01 PM
- 576 Views
We share 1/3 of the DNA of flowers. Where are those in our ancestral tree?
09/06/2015 02:20:46 PM
- 605 Views
Americas (Christian?!) "accepted religious standards" can and have been changed to vindicate robbers
15/06/2015 03:37:12 AM
- 588 Views
So? My point is that liberals would not allow you to teach that in a public school
15/06/2015 01:43:43 PM
- 519 Views
Liberals consistently teach that in schools, despite conservatives calling it “revisionist history”
17/06/2015 10:00:48 AM
- 634 Views
The problem with the "there can not spontanous life" argument is
15/06/2015 02:29:06 PM
- 571 Views
"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
17/06/2015 10:02:00 AM
- 593 Views
will since omnipotent beings are ut side the realm of the possible we can eliminate that
17/06/2015 05:45:36 PM
- 654 Views
Who says omnipotent beings are outside the realm of possibility?
20/06/2015 03:59:44 AM
- 705 Views
You can always find unaswered question in science but that gives no weight to religion
22/06/2015 01:52:25 PM
- 566 Views
...I'm confused, are you claiming that no real fossils have been found?
07/06/2015 02:41:12 PM
- 604 Views
And they prove what, exactly?
07/06/2015 11:24:43 PM
- 719 Views
Er, well yeah, that's the point- Scientific knowledge keeps growing and challenging itself
08/06/2015 02:58:26 PM
- 657 Views
It's not at all the same.
09/06/2015 02:53:06 PM
- 617 Views
Dude, you're monologuing like a supervillain and going off on insane tangents.
09/06/2015 03:27:37 PM
- 718 Views
In fact, fossils are not even necessary sometimes -- we can see it over the course of generations
08/06/2015 09:06:23 PM
- 639 Views
That's not evolution, idiot.
09/06/2015 02:31:27 PM
- 588 Views
um, that's actually EXACTLY how natural selection works, thanks for arguing my point so nicely
10/06/2015 12:19:32 AM
- 596 Views
They're not changing. Same species, same characteristics. We're just finding different proportions.
13/06/2015 05:35:09 PM
- 538 Views
"It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
15/06/2015 03:36:42 AM
- 534 Views
Re: "It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
15/06/2015 02:23:36 PM
- 595 Views
I would not have expected to see you adhere to a scientist position
07/06/2015 03:06:11 AM
- 672 Views
I am not; I am criticizing the people who apply it inconsistently
07/06/2015 11:14:05 PM
- 700 Views
You are confusing science and scientism
08/06/2015 10:15:57 PM
- 590 Views
For what it is worth, I have encountered many people who satisfy those stated "scientism" criteria
15/06/2015 03:37:36 AM
- 550 Views
can republicans stop their posturing about adhering to morality?
08/06/2015 09:17:16 PM
- 615 Views
My own homosexual inclinations would not constitute hypocrisy in opposing deviant behavior
09/06/2015 02:14:56 PM
- 623 Views
at least you're finally open about your homosexual attraction to the former Bruce Jenner...
10/06/2015 12:05:10 AM
- 723 Views

"… in the latter times some shall depart from the faith… speaking lies in hypocrisy…"
15/06/2015 03:36:08 AM
- 676 Views
Good luck with that; (at least) two beloved long time RAFOlk are post-medically transgendered
15/06/2015 03:34:33 AM
- 487 Views
I find this entire discussion absolutely hilarious.
15/06/2015 04:19:31 PM
- 496 Views
well I am sucb a died in the wool liberal I just cant help myself
15/06/2015 06:25:57 PM
- 499 Views
...what? Attacking points is pretty much what debate IS.
16/06/2015 04:29:05 AM
- 561 Views
No...
17/06/2015 08:00:57 PM
- 549 Views
OK?
18/06/2015 04:03:32 AM
- 574 Views
Oh, I'm sorry.
18/06/2015 09:05:42 PM
- 646 Views
A thesis delayed till the SECOND paragraph is, at best, misplaced
20/06/2015 09:37:36 AM
- 629 Views
Bah, damn you for good points!
21/06/2015 09:33:49 PM
- 635 Views
The really fun part is when grammatical gender doesn't match the sex even for humans.
22/06/2015 10:30:33 PM
- 519 Views
"Mädchen" was my initial reference, changed because I think Spanish more accessible to Americans
24/06/2015 04:42:37 AM
- 600 Views

Re: Oh, I'm sorry.
20/06/2015 04:44:24 PM
- 702 Views
You're missing my whole issue with labeling.
21/06/2015 09:32:36 PM
- 639 Views
Had this post been the thread-starter it would have drawn far fewer complaints
24/06/2015 04:41:06 AM
- 894 Views
The sheer brazenness of the "calling bigots 'bigots' is offensive" "defense" continually amazes me
20/06/2015 04:03:46 AM
- 828 Views
This might be a complete non-sequitur, but...
21/06/2015 10:38:19 PM
- 520 Views