Sentence fragments are unacceptable in technical writing. You need to fix that.
Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 06:51:05 AM
Also, your conception of 1950s marriage is fairly caricatured. Although the topic of your paper suggests you realize that, you should acknowledge it.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
What do you think of this intro?
- 14/12/2009 06:14:51 AM
924 Views
I'm not a fan of the first two sentences.
- 14/12/2009 06:42:10 AM
669 Views
Well, i know for a fact that he doesn't opening with questions
- 14/12/2009 07:02:03 AM
821 Views
*NM*
Sentence fragments are unacceptable in technical writing. You need to fix that.
- 14/12/2009 06:51:05 AM
651 Views
I want to stick a wikipedia-style "who?" in there.
- 14/12/2009 10:53:02 AM
635 Views
That's actually how we're taught to write in American high schools...
- 14/12/2009 02:39:56 PM
639 Views
Part of my problem is that he hasn't told me what level this is for.
- 14/12/2009 03:04:40 PM
619 Views
Aye, but it's an intro.
- 15/12/2009 08:07:38 AM
594 Views
References should come at the first mention of whatever it is. *NM*
- 15/12/2009 08:42:27 AM
267 Views
It's simply an introduction, my citations and stuff come in a little later. *NM*
- 14/12/2009 08:49:15 PM
348 Views
I smell a strawman...
- 15/12/2009 02:25:36 AM
645 Views
well it was in response to a prompt which stated people call it the "Golden Age". My hands were tied *NM*
- 15/12/2009 02:20:54 PM
315 Views
Stylistically it needs a lot of work.
- 15/12/2009 03:28:24 AM
718 Views
Hell, with a critique like that I may start putting up my introductory paragraphs. 
*NM*
- 15/12/2009 04:37:53 AM
343 Views
*NM*
- 15/12/2009 04:37:53 AM
343 Views