Should CBS show Super Bowl ad featuring Tim Tebow and his mother?
AP_NY151_TEBOW_SUPER_BOWL_A Former University of Florida quarterback Tim Tebow is in Mobile, Ala., preparing for Saturday's Senior Bowl, but the hot topic surrounding him is the ad Tebow will appear in during the Feb. 7 Super Bowl.
The ad is being paid for by a group called Focus on the Family, and will star Tebow and his mother, who went against doctor’s advice and decided to keep Tim despite medical risks.
A national coalition of women's groups called on CBS on Monday to scrap its plan to broadcast the ad, which critics say is likely to convey an anti-abortion message.
"An ad that uses sports to divide rather than to unite has no place in the biggest national sports event of the year - an event designed to bring Americans together," said Jehmu Greene, president of the New York-based Women's Media Center.
CBS said it has approved the script for the 30-second ad and has given no indication that the protest would have an impact. A network spokesman, Dana McClintock, said CBS would ensure that any issue-oriented ad was "appropriate for air."
Tebow's response to the uproar: "I know some people won't agree with it, but I think they can at least respect that I stand up for what I believe. I've always been very convicted of it (his views on abortion) because that's the reason I'm here, because my mom was a very courageous woman. So any way that I could help, I would do it."
We haven't seen the ad -- but will share it once we do -- but we'd like to know what you think. Should CBS broadcast the ad or is it too controversial?
Well, what do you think?
Although I am pro choice, I believe in freedom of speech and can change the channel if I don't want to watch the commercial. I also recognize the right of CBS to put what ever programing/ads they see fit on their station.
AP_NY151_TEBOW_SUPER_BOWL_A Former University of Florida quarterback Tim Tebow is in Mobile, Ala., preparing for Saturday's Senior Bowl, but the hot topic surrounding him is the ad Tebow will appear in during the Feb. 7 Super Bowl.
The ad is being paid for by a group called Focus on the Family, and will star Tebow and his mother, who went against doctor’s advice and decided to keep Tim despite medical risks.
A national coalition of women's groups called on CBS on Monday to scrap its plan to broadcast the ad, which critics say is likely to convey an anti-abortion message.
"An ad that uses sports to divide rather than to unite has no place in the biggest national sports event of the year - an event designed to bring Americans together," said Jehmu Greene, president of the New York-based Women's Media Center.
CBS said it has approved the script for the 30-second ad and has given no indication that the protest would have an impact. A network spokesman, Dana McClintock, said CBS would ensure that any issue-oriented ad was "appropriate for air."
Tebow's response to the uproar: "I know some people won't agree with it, but I think they can at least respect that I stand up for what I believe. I've always been very convicted of it (his views on abortion) because that's the reason I'm here, because my mom was a very courageous woman. So any way that I could help, I would do it."
We haven't seen the ad -- but will share it once we do -- but we'd like to know what you think. Should CBS broadcast the ad or is it too controversial?
Well, what do you think?
Although I am pro choice, I believe in freedom of speech and can change the channel if I don't want to watch the commercial. I also recognize the right of CBS to put what ever programing/ads they see fit on their station.
I'm still me.
Anti-Abortion CBS Super Bowl commercial
27/01/2010 05:35:37 PM
- 1978 Views
I think that its a fantastic idea...
27/01/2010 05:46:17 PM
- 1213 Views
agreed... somewhat.
27/01/2010 05:52:26 PM
- 1201 Views
See, that's the debate here...
27/01/2010 06:03:01 PM
- 949 Views
depending on the developmental stage, an embryo might be nothign more than a clump of cells.
27/01/2010 07:18:25 PM
- 862 Views
You make baby Allah cry. *NM*
27/01/2010 07:58:01 PM
- 561 Views
was it the dog comparison?
27/01/2010 07:59:22 PM
- 1010 Views
yeah except islam allows abortion in certain conditions
28/01/2010 05:43:29 AM
- 966 Views
Shall we be technical....
27/01/2010 09:28:20 PM
- 966 Views
And since when are you a trained eye?
27/01/2010 09:52:05 PM
- 1080 Views
If there's a chance the mother might die...
27/01/2010 07:30:54 PM
- 1018 Views
What if the "real" preson is an asshole? I'd gamble on the baby who has the potential to not be.
27/01/2010 08:44:57 PM
- 947 Views
Which is why I'm against elective abortion
27/01/2010 09:33:59 PM
- 993 Views
Then we are in accord.
27/01/2010 10:00:32 PM
- 983 Views
I want to see an atheism Superbowl ad
27/01/2010 06:21:02 PM
- 1044 Views
Go ahead and pay for one....
27/01/2010 06:37:18 PM
- 1117 Views
how does atheism take anything away?
27/01/2010 07:20:49 PM
- 1006 Views
LOL It only "takes away" mental enslavement.
27/01/2010 07:50:56 PM
- 980 Views
Who says?
27/01/2010 09:42:07 PM
- 968 Views
You're not "open" to anything.
27/01/2010 10:02:03 PM
- 1105 Views
I don't need your sadness dude...or your pity.
27/01/2010 10:19:43 PM
- 1025 Views
Personally speaking
27/01/2010 10:36:45 PM
- 1011 Views
Tolerance much?
27/01/2010 08:11:12 PM
- 1066 Views
Don't read an emotion into that I didn't put into it.
27/01/2010 09:44:37 PM
- 821 Views
Your comment is rude and narrow minded. Regardless of what emotion you feel
28/01/2010 03:20:11 PM
- 972 Views
Fortunately, positivity doesn't appear to be the qualifying characteristic
27/01/2010 08:26:28 PM
- 951 Views
Well there is a difference between...
27/01/2010 09:47:36 PM
- 1134 Views
The fact is that it was a positive message, whether you agreed with it or not.
27/01/2010 09:52:47 PM
- 994 Views
I don't think it is the same thing
27/01/2010 07:17:19 PM
- 860 Views
Followed by an add of all the babies that should have been aborted? *NM*
29/01/2010 05:53:43 PM
- 591 Views
The problem is the hyprocrisy of CBS.
27/01/2010 07:56:58 PM
- 1100 Views
And they claim this is the result of you liberal types pissing and moaning.
27/01/2010 08:40:57 PM
- 938 Views
"the buggery agenda"
27/01/2010 08:47:28 PM
- 973 Views
I know, I loved it! I might start using that instead of Fagenda.
*NM*
27/01/2010 09:03:53 PM
- 578 Views

You might need to rework titles too. "Most Buggered", "Her Buggerness"
27/01/2010 09:06:44 PM
- 1113 Views
I really, really hope a pro-choice group buys the next ad space
27/01/2010 08:09:16 PM
- 1075 Views
Replace Hitler with Ben Affleck and I'd help pay for it.
27/01/2010 08:12:25 PM
- 848 Views

That would work also. The main thing is to pick someone who has committed crimes against humanity
28/01/2010 10:57:28 AM
- 765 Views
But how would you folks argue on the internet then? I'd still have Stalin... *NM*
27/01/2010 08:49:17 PM
- 541 Views
*brain explodes*
27/01/2010 08:30:51 PM
- 849 Views
are your sinuses clear now?
*NM*
27/01/2010 08:54:18 PM
- 529 Views

Oddly enough, they aren't.
27/01/2010 08:59:27 PM
- 1018 Views
the super bowl is no place for political messages, no matter how thinly veiled.
28/01/2010 05:15:13 AM
- 849 Views
Are you saying that CBS should be required to run an opposing ad? *NM*
28/01/2010 05:19:39 AM
- 525 Views
if they are going to approve a political message, they should be required to air the opposite view
28/01/2010 05:27:33 AM
- 819 Views
The problem with Pro-Choice is...
28/01/2010 02:12:13 PM
- 953 Views
Not really a fair comment
28/01/2010 02:44:21 PM
- 939 Views
Re: Not really a fair comment
28/01/2010 03:27:03 PM
- 1063 Views
I can't see Youtube at work and am out the next couple of nights so I can't see it till the weekend
28/01/2010 03:36:48 PM
- 820 Views
I know you were going to tell me that it was slanted...
28/01/2010 03:57:37 PM
- 986 Views
That is unfair on me
28/01/2010 04:18:07 PM
- 991 Views
...which is yet another argument for publicly funded healthcare
28/01/2010 03:46:25 PM
- 866 Views
Re: ...which is yet another argument for publicly funded healthcare
28/01/2010 04:03:46 PM
- 964 Views
I don't think it's so much a matter of supplying misleading information,
28/01/2010 11:07:24 PM
- 902 Views