Active Users:433 Time:18/06/2025 03:15:45 AM
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though? Aemon Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM
There's always someone smarter and more knowledgeable, and there are always issues that you haven't considered. While you rant about the stupidity of those beneath you, the people above you roll their eyes in disgust. Fact is, we can't all be the world's top expert on everything. I bring my car into your shop, and you show me where the dipstick is. You bring your computer into my place, and I take the soda can out of your cd drive.

If only the most politically knowledgeable person in the world could vote, then I wouldn't be participating, and neither would you. Keep in mind that, while you're not as bad as "those people" that you point fingers at, you're still among the ignorant (relative to the elite). The opinion that's clearly correct to you might be the worst possible thing for the nation, due to information you just haven't come across.

Anyway. All I'm saying is that morons are making decisions without having all the information, and you, in spite of having more information than them, are still doing the very same thing. Remember that the next time you yell at the tv. :P
This message last edited by Aemon on 02/02/2010 at 01:43:50 AM
Reply to message
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view - 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM 865 Views
And a personal comment - 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM 600 Views
Re: And a personal comment - 02/02/2010 01:16:53 AM 556 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though? - 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM 633 Views
*thumbs up* *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:50:45 AM 222 Views
Or should I say... ? *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:51:03 AM 246 Views
I Don't watch tv - 02/02/2010 02:29:53 AM 593 Views
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding - 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM 445 Views
Even so. - 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM 469 Views
Like the NYT? - 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM 503 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias. - 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM 525 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters - 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM 566 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM 499 Views
PBS is biased - 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM 471 Views
You're entitled to believe that. - 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM 601 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM 434 Views
We have been for some time. - 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM 497 Views
I don't think that's the case - 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM 477 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform. - 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM 461 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare - 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM 590 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM 602 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM 560 Views
[insert witty subject line here] - 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM 589 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here - 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM 569 Views
'K - 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM 552 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode' - 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM 581 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?" - 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM 606 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none - 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM 545 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning. - 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM 595 Views
Sorry for the delay... - 12/02/2010 11:40:21 PM 686 Views
NP, life happens. - 15/02/2010 02:06:55 PM 682 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot - 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM 484 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt? - 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM 554 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries - 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM 453 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't. - 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM 465 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it - 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM 502 Views
Whom do you prefer? - 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM 524 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though - 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM 427 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship - 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM 486 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!" - 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM 634 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel - 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM 455 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM 478 Views
Maybe; Billy Mitchell might debate that were he alive. - 05/02/2010 05:34:54 AM 591 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you! - 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM 658 Views
Some information and a question - 02/03/2010 05:49:20 AM 996 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems - 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM 456 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress? - 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM 475 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on - 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM 400 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist? - 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM 431 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want - 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM 359 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills. - 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM 517 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans - 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM 465 Views
Um... sorry, man.... - 10/02/2010 11:06:22 AM 639 Views

Reply to Message