Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation
Cannoli Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM
It was the actions of the government that gave Japan a reason to attack us. Classical liberal or libertarians would not have incited Japan by freezing their assets or interfering with their commerce. Pearl Harbor was not a bolt from the blue, and when you get right down to it, how did it threaten the actual country? Destroying a bunch of obsolete ships is a long way from invading or actually harming the country itself. As far as the US government went, it was thanks to the awesome power and efficacy of big government that we had Japanese losing their property and being interned in concentration camps, a country filled with Stalinesque propaganda urging citizens to sacrifice for their government, spy on the neighbors, produce greater quantities and be good sheep, and an arrogant, uninformed dilettante stepping all over the cranks of the adults who were trying to fight a war responsibly, and sabotaging the end results of our theoretical war aims (we end tyranny and dictatorship in Europe by liberating the countries that CHOSE dictators, and turning the rest over to a tyrannical dictator who seems nice to said arrogant dilettante?!? ). Yay government!
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view
01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM
- 884 Views
And a personal comment
01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM
- 618 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though?
02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM
- 651 Views
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding
02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM
- 462 Views
Even so.
05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM
- 488 Views
Like the NYT?
05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM
- 522 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias.
05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM
- 543 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters
05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM
- 585 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. )
05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM
- 516 Views
PBS is biased
05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM
- 491 Views
You're entitled to believe that.
05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM
- 621 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR
09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM
- 451 Views
Even were that true (which I dispute) my statement stands.
09/02/2010 09:50:36 AM
- 566 Views
so they wouldn't be biased becuas it could hurt them but you still argue republicans attack them
09/02/2010 02:19:53 PM
- 526 Views
We have been for some time.
02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM
- 513 Views
I don't think that's the case
03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM
- 496 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform.
04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM
- 478 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare
04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM
- 610 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM
- 628 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM
- 577 Views
[insert witty subject line here]
06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM
- 606 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here
06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM
- 585 Views
'K
08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM
- 569 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode'
08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM
- 599 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?"
09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM
- 624 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none
09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM
- 564 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning.
10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM
- 613 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot
05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM
- 500 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt?
06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM
- 569 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries
08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM
- 470 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't.
08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM
- 482 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it
09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM
- 522 Views
Whom do you prefer?
09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM
- 544 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though
09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM
- 445 Views
In other words you prefer the system we have; thanks for admitting it.
10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
- 499 Views

I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship
02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM
- 505 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!"
02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM
- 652 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel
03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM
- 471 Views
Don't speak in absolutes and I won't read absolutes.
04/02/2010 10:08:43 AM
- 484 Views
Some qualifiers can be left unsaid for a clearer message. Or better delivery
04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
- 475 Views

Qualifiers are clarifying by nature.
04/02/2010 10:49:06 AM
- 604 Views
huh. That does make sense. I know malpractice is a big weight on the the system in the US.
04/02/2010 11:58:37 AM
- 441 Views
Perhaps, but it's hardly the greatest weight, or even in the top three, IMHO.
05/02/2010 05:44:49 AM
- 592 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation
05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM
- 495 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you!
05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM
- 676 Views
I do generally agree, but I think the Washington Naval Conference is too often overlooked.
06/02/2010 02:33:51 AM
- 612 Views
Politicians and pundits should stop calling things that happened in the last decade "unprecedented"
02/02/2010 03:23:27 AM
- 682 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems
02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM
- 474 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress?
02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM
- 490 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on
02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM
- 418 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist?
08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM
- 451 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want
08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM
- 378 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills.
08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM
- 535 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans
09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM
- 482 Views
So we've gone from "stop being secretive" to "no public meetings" eh?
09/02/2010 11:59:50 AM
- 490 Views
well it was your guy who was up in arms about private meetings
09/02/2010 02:29:34 PM
- 471 Views
Was it? I don't recall any Dem complaining about private meeting on healthcare.
10/02/2010 09:44:56 AM
- 627 Views
most liberals seem to foretting the "rhetoric" that Obama used to get elected
13/02/2010 06:54:34 AM
- 465 Views