Active Users:1895 Time:20/10/2025 02:41:55 AM
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you! SilverWarder Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM
It was the actions of the government that gave Japan a reason to attack us. Classical liberal or libertarians would not have incited Japan by freezing their assets or interfering with their commerce.


Classical liberal or libertarians would never have had a navy at Pearl to be attacked.

However you are missing or more likely ignoring, the entire Japanese culture of the time, which was a resurgence of militarism and was being exercised through conquest.

All that asset freezing etc. was an attempt to slow down the Japanese war machine which had already invaded a whole stack of their neighbours (successfully) without going to actual war.

Of course it didn't work.

Hawaii was going to get attacked eventually - it is part of the Pacific and the Japanese plan was to make the Pacific their own personal lake.

I'm sorry - you think Japan was provoked? Maybe, but that provoking happened many many years before in the 1800s when America used gunboat diplomacy to forcibly open the island nation to trade. The militaristic resurgence was in many ways, like the one that happened in Germany as a response to the Treaty of Versailles. "See, we were screwed, let's go get back some of our own now!" The return of a militaristic society was in the offing for a long long time.

Now - if the colonialism of the 1600s to the 1800s hadn't taken place? Well, maybe, but who knows. That's changing an awful lot of history. Probably wouldn't have changed much since Japan always hated the Chinese for repeatedly invading them. Eventually they were going to want some payback for that had they stayed an insular, militaristic society. As in all things eventually contact would have happened.

When was the US supposed to become this classic liberal or libertarian society? At the beginning? During the Depression? When?

Sorry - reality is this. The US REALLY didn't want to get involved in another World War. They tried pretty darned hard to stay out of it militarily - probably longer than they should have.

As long as Japan wanted what they wanted, all the political efforts in the world weren't going to keep Hawaii and the Aleutians from being attacked. Maybe even the West Coast, hard to say. A few sanctions and the like weren't what caused that, they were in response to that. You're putting the cart in front of the horse.
May God stand between you and harm in all the empty places you must walk.

Old Egyptian Blessing
Reply to message
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view - 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM 913 Views
And a personal comment - 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM 651 Views
Re: And a personal comment - 02/02/2010 01:16:53 AM 608 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though? - 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM 682 Views
*thumbs up* *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:50:45 AM 249 Views
Or should I say... ? *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:51:03 AM 262 Views
I Don't watch tv - 02/02/2010 02:29:53 AM 641 Views
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding - 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM 491 Views
Even so. - 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM 523 Views
Like the NYT? - 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM 550 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias. - 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM 584 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters - 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM 613 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM 543 Views
PBS is biased - 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM 523 Views
You're entitled to believe that. - 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM 663 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM 481 Views
We have been for some time. - 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM 555 Views
I don't think that's the case - 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM 527 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform. - 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM 515 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare - 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM 640 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM 659 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM 606 Views
[insert witty subject line here] - 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM 639 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here - 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM 620 Views
'K - 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM 611 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode' - 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM 641 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?" - 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM 663 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none - 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM 598 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning. - 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM 660 Views
Sorry for the delay... - 12/02/2010 11:40:21 PM 744 Views
NP, life happens. - 15/02/2010 02:06:55 PM 746 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot - 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM 534 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt? - 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM 601 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries - 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM 503 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't. - 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM 515 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it - 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM 551 Views
Whom do you prefer? - 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM 585 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though - 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM 482 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship - 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM 538 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!" - 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM 684 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel - 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM 501 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM 527 Views
Maybe; Billy Mitchell might debate that were he alive. - 05/02/2010 05:34:54 AM 648 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you! - 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM 705 Views
Some information and a question - 02/03/2010 05:49:20 AM 1064 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems - 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM 504 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress? - 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM 519 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on - 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM 448 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist? - 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM 493 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want - 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM 415 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills. - 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM 579 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans - 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM 518 Views
Um... sorry, man.... - 10/02/2010 11:06:22 AM 690 Views

Reply to Message