Active Users:2456 Time:01/08/2026 01:49:12 PM
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) Joel Send a noteboard - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM
I don't know if all of their content is free but they offer a great deal of free content.

They do at least claim to be unbiased, however laughable I consider that claim (particularly when the guy covering the FL election in 2000, the first to call it for Bush, was one of Bushs cousins; it's remarkable how many people who said on election night that Bush won happened to be related to or employed by him. ) I don't think Stewart has ever made such a claim in earnest, though I admit I RARELY see much of his stuff since I won't pay for TV (in fact, I think I've overheard Rushs show at the quickie mart far more recently) and Rush spends too much time bashing "liberal" this and "liberal" that for any such claim to be taken seriously.

When I watch politics on TV (which is seldom these days since I'm so disgusted with all of them) it's usually the News Hour and Washington Week, but then I seem to recall the last administration thought PBS was biased (probably because it was the first news outlet under their management that didn't do as told) so I guess no one's perfect. ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view - 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM 1036 Views
And a personal comment - 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM 790 Views
Re: And a personal comment - 02/02/2010 01:16:53 AM 748 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though? - 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM 814 Views
*thumbs up* *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:50:45 AM 330 Views
Or should I say... ? *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:51:03 AM 318 Views
I Don't watch tv - 02/02/2010 02:29:53 AM 771 Views
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding - 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM 624 Views
Even so. - 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM 664 Views
Like the NYT? - 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM 665 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias. - 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM 693 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters - 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM 770 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM 662 Views
PBS is biased - 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM 640 Views
You're entitled to believe that. - 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM 792 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM 617 Views
We have been for some time. - 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM 697 Views
I don't think that's the case - 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM 651 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform. - 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM 639 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare - 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM 756 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM 807 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM 759 Views
[insert witty subject line here] - 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM 756 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here - 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM 750 Views
'K - 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM 753 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode' - 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM 775 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?" - 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM 770 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none - 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM 724 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning. - 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM 814 Views
Sorry for the delay... - 12/02/2010 11:40:21 PM 859 Views
NP, life happens. - 15/02/2010 02:06:55 PM 874 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot - 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM 635 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt? - 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM 730 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries - 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM 633 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't. - 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM 640 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it - 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM 676 Views
Whom do you prefer? - 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM 716 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though - 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM 608 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship - 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM 677 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!" - 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM 838 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel - 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM 655 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM 660 Views
Maybe; Billy Mitchell might debate that were he alive. - 05/02/2010 05:34:54 AM 781 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you! - 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM 824 Views
Some information and a question - 02/03/2010 05:49:20 AM 1225 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems - 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM 618 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress? - 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM 641 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on - 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM 584 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist? - 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM 621 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want - 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM 523 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills. - 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM 720 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans - 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM 635 Views
Um... sorry, man.... - 10/02/2010 11:06:22 AM 861 Views

Reply to Message