Active Users:1156 Time:24/09/2026 10:20:10 PM
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills. Joel Send a noteboard - 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM
I don't defend Shelby. I really have not seen the details of what he id doing I have only heard it discussed but assuming he blocking all appointments unless he gets some pork he needs to be slapped down by the GOP. Maybe lose all of his committee seats.

If the GOP is simply blocking bills to block bills the dems need to focus on specific things that are being blocked and stop the silly whining that the republicans need to be bipartisan and do things their way. If they want republican support they need to include republicans in writing bills and write some bills republicans can support.

Yet again I say I think including Snowes amendment to have 50 federally funded but state run universal healthcare programs, but only if <95% of the state had private insurance after a year, and only if the particular state(s) didn't opt out, was gold. It virtually guaranteed universal coverage but didn't paint anyone into a corner, and real competition would ensue (driving down costs) one way or the other, either because private insurers offered competitive plans to forestall a state plan, or because they failed to do so and were FORCED to compete with a less expensive alternative. Of course, that's about the only thing we've seen from the Republicans on that issue apart from the insistence tort reform will make everything alright. I'm willing to look at some tort reform as part accompanied by other things, but I feel about as good about tort reform AND NOTHING ELSE as you do about a federal insurance program by itself. The differences are 1) Republicans who want the latter aren't in the majority and 2) they haven't written a bill like that anyway. It's easier to sit back and wait for the other guy to fail than it is to lead; the Dems proved that themselves. ;)

There were quotes from Shelby in the article posted a few days ago; he does manage to work in a shot about how he's trying to show Obama he has to work with Republicans, but the only "concession" he's on record seeking is a contract for (European based) Airbus to build our mid-air refueling tankers in AL and the importance of a new FBI IDE lab also in AL. Honestly, I think they should vote the appropriations and do the construction in, say, NJ, just to see Shelbys face when he's offered everything he wants except for the small detail about it being in HIS state. You won't see the Republicans shut him down though because he's obstructing the executive branches operations (while he shouts the need for a new FBI lab in the name of defense. ) We've come along way from Margaret Chase Smith (basically) telling McCarthy to stfu and quit being an ass; the closest I can recall any Republican coming to breaking with his party for the countrys good (or any reason) is the "RINO" Senators who said they wouldn't vote for the nuclear option during the Dems filibusters. Senate Republicans don't WANT to play the Russ Feingold role in something like McCain/Feingold, or the Ted Kennedy role in No Childs Behind Left. They want Obamas Waterloo, by any means necessary.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view - 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM 1048 Views
And a personal comment - 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM 806 Views
Re: And a personal comment - 02/02/2010 01:16:53 AM 768 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though? - 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM 832 Views
*thumbs up* *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:50:45 AM 340 Views
Or should I say... ? *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:51:03 AM 331 Views
I Don't watch tv - 02/02/2010 02:29:53 AM 789 Views
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding - 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM 645 Views
Even so. - 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM 683 Views
Like the NYT? - 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM 689 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias. - 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM 713 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters - 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM 802 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. ) - 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM 683 Views
PBS is biased - 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM 676 Views
You're entitled to believe that. - 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM 811 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM 648 Views
We have been for some time. - 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM 721 Views
I don't think that's the case - 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM 674 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform. - 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM 664 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare - 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM 775 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM 823 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue. - 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM 783 Views
[insert witty subject line here] - 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM 785 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here - 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM 772 Views
'K - 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM 772 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode' - 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM 795 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?" - 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM 793 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none - 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM 740 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning. - 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM 846 Views
Sorry for the delay... - 12/02/2010 11:40:21 PM 872 Views
NP, life happens. - 15/02/2010 02:06:55 PM 886 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot - 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM 654 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt? - 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM 745 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries - 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM 646 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't. - 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM 659 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it - 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM 698 Views
Whom do you prefer? - 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM 735 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though - 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM 626 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship - 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM 708 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!" - 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM 859 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel - 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM 672 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation - 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM 684 Views
Maybe; Billy Mitchell might debate that were he alive. - 05/02/2010 05:34:54 AM 802 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you! - 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM 839 Views
Some information and a question - 02/03/2010 05:49:20 AM 1243 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems - 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM 633 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress? - 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM 662 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on - 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM 600 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist? - 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM 640 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want - 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM 540 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills. - 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM 742 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans - 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM 650 Views
Um... sorry, man.... - 10/02/2010 11:06:22 AM 880 Views

Reply to Message