PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM
They really don't even go to much effort to hide it. Sorry that is a simple fact. You always refute my statement with some actual fact but until then you really are simply in denial. Their anchors are liberal and their reporting is liberal. Your claim that it would be against their best interest would hold some merit if not for the fact that republicans have repeatedly attempted to cut their funding and failed.
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view
- 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM
1063 Views
And a personal comment
- 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM
824 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though?
- 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM
846 Views
? *NM*
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding
- 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM
660 Views
Even so.
- 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM
698 Views
Like the NYT?
- 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM
705 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias.
- 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM
728 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters
- 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM
818 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. )
- 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM
700 Views
PBS is biased
- 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM
696 Views
You're entitled to believe that.
- 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM
826 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR
- 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM
662 Views
Even were that true (which I dispute) my statement stands.
- 09/02/2010 09:50:36 AM
770 Views
so they wouldn't be biased becuas it could hurt them but you still argue republicans attack them
- 09/02/2010 02:19:53 PM
732 Views
We have been for some time.
- 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM
735 Views
I don't think that's the case
- 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM
689 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform.
- 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM
678 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare
- 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM
795 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM
836 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM
806 Views
[insert witty subject line here]
- 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM
800 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here
- 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM
790 Views
'K
- 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM
789 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode'
- 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM
811 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?"
- 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM
806 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none
- 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM
756 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning.
- 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM
861 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot
- 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM
671 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt?
- 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM
761 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries
- 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM
661 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't.
- 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM
674 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it
- 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM
710 Views
Whom do you prefer?
- 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM
750 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though
- 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM
643 Views
In other words you prefer the system we have; thanks for admitting it. 
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
698 Views
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
698 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship
- 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM
741 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!"
- 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM
874 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel
- 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM
690 Views
Don't speak in absolutes and I won't read absolutes.
- 04/02/2010 10:08:43 AM
676 Views
Some qualifiers can be left unsaid for a clearer message. Or better delivery 
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
674 Views
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
674 Views
Qualifiers are clarifying by nature.
- 04/02/2010 10:49:06 AM
805 Views
huh. That does make sense. I know malpractice is a big weight on the the system in the US.
- 04/02/2010 11:58:37 AM
663 Views
Perhaps, but it's hardly the greatest weight, or even in the top three, IMHO.
- 05/02/2010 05:44:49 AM
812 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation
- 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM
708 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you!
- 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM
856 Views
I do generally agree, but I think the Washington Naval Conference is too often overlooked.
- 06/02/2010 02:33:51 AM
840 Views
Politicians and pundits should stop calling things that happened in the last decade "unprecedented"
- 02/02/2010 03:23:27 AM
937 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems
- 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM
649 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress?
- 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM
673 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on
- 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM
619 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist?
- 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM
656 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want
- 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM
559 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills.
- 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM
754 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans
- 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM
664 Views
So we've gone from "stop being secretive" to "no public meetings" eh?
- 09/02/2010 11:59:50 AM
713 Views
well it was your guy who was up in arms about private meetings
- 09/02/2010 02:29:34 PM
683 Views
Was it? I don't recall any Dem complaining about private meeting on healthcare.
- 10/02/2010 09:44:56 AM
848 Views
most liberals seem to foretting the "rhetoric" that Obama used to get elected
- 13/02/2010 06:54:34 AM
652 Views
