PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM
They really don't even go to much effort to hide it. Sorry that is a simple fact. You always refute my statement with some actual fact but until then you really are simply in denial. Their anchors are liberal and their reporting is liberal. Your claim that it would be against their best interest would hold some merit if not for the fact that republicans have repeatedly attempted to cut their funding and failed.
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view
- 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM
886 Views
And a personal comment
- 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM
620 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though?
- 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM
653 Views
? *NM*
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding
- 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM
464 Views
Even so.
- 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM
488 Views
Like the NYT?
- 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM
523 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias.
- 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM
544 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters
- 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM
585 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. )
- 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM
517 Views
PBS is biased
- 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM
493 Views
You're entitled to believe that.
- 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM
623 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR
- 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM
453 Views
Even were that true (which I dispute) my statement stands.
- 09/02/2010 09:50:36 AM
567 Views
so they wouldn't be biased becuas it could hurt them but you still argue republicans attack them
- 09/02/2010 02:19:53 PM
528 Views
We have been for some time.
- 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM
515 Views
I don't think that's the case
- 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM
498 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform.
- 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM
480 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare
- 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM
611 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM
630 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM
577 Views
[insert witty subject line here]
- 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM
608 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here
- 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM
587 Views
'K
- 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM
571 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode'
- 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM
601 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?"
- 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM
626 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none
- 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM
564 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning.
- 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM
615 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot
- 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM
501 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt?
- 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM
571 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries
- 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM
471 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't.
- 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM
483 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it
- 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM
522 Views
Whom do you prefer?
- 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM
545 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though
- 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM
446 Views
In other words you prefer the system we have; thanks for admitting it. 
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
499 Views
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
499 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship
- 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM
506 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!"
- 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM
652 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel
- 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM
471 Views
Don't speak in absolutes and I won't read absolutes.
- 04/02/2010 10:08:43 AM
485 Views
Some qualifiers can be left unsaid for a clearer message. Or better delivery 
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
476 Views
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
476 Views
Qualifiers are clarifying by nature.
- 04/02/2010 10:49:06 AM
606 Views
huh. That does make sense. I know malpractice is a big weight on the the system in the US.
- 04/02/2010 11:58:37 AM
443 Views
Perhaps, but it's hardly the greatest weight, or even in the top three, IMHO.
- 05/02/2010 05:44:49 AM
593 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation
- 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM
496 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you!
- 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM
678 Views
I do generally agree, but I think the Washington Naval Conference is too often overlooked.
- 06/02/2010 02:33:51 AM
614 Views
Politicians and pundits should stop calling things that happened in the last decade "unprecedented"
- 02/02/2010 03:23:27 AM
682 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems
- 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM
475 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress?
- 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM
492 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on
- 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM
418 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist?
- 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM
453 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want
- 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM
379 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills.
- 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM
537 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans
- 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM
484 Views
So we've gone from "stop being secretive" to "no public meetings" eh?
- 09/02/2010 11:59:50 AM
492 Views
well it was your guy who was up in arms about private meetings
- 09/02/2010 02:29:34 PM
473 Views
Was it? I don't recall any Dem complaining about private meeting on healthcare.
- 10/02/2010 09:44:56 AM
627 Views
most liberals seem to foretting the "rhetoric" that Obama used to get elected
- 13/02/2010 06:54:34 AM
467 Views
