well it was your guy who was up in arms about private meetings
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 09/02/2010 02:29:34 PM
I think they should meet behind closed doors or they will never be able accomplish anything. It isn't like closed door meeting wouldn't happen anyways. No I think if you want to meet with the oppposistion and work things out you make it real meetings that conduct real business and stop the silly dog and pony show photo ops that no one but the true believers think amount to working together.
Bush was able to accomplish bipartsian legislation and some of the bigger bills had dem cosponsors. To bad Obama can live up the example set by Bush.
Reid put a hold on the nominees but he wanted one of his friends appointed to an energy commision.
Bush was able to accomplish bipartsian legislation and some of the bigger bills had dem cosponsors. To bad Obama can live up the example set by Bush.
Reid put a hold on the nominees but he wanted one of his friends appointed to an energy commision.
Why bipartisanship can't work: the expert view
- 01/02/2010 11:34:58 PM
1018 Views
And a personal comment
- 01/02/2010 11:39:28 PM
758 Views
Who's to say YOU really know what's happening in Washington, though?
- 02/02/2010 01:41:20 AM
787 Views
? *NM*
not to mention those who mistake knowledge for understanding
- 02/02/2010 10:41:14 PM
604 Views
Even so.
- 05/02/2010 05:45:54 AM
646 Views
Like the NYT?
- 05/02/2010 02:12:36 PM
650 Views
I don't believe the Times has ever conceded bias.
- 05/02/2010 06:03:02 PM
673 Views
and neither does Fox so I am not sure that matters
- 05/02/2010 06:40:15 PM
732 Views
Note that I didn't mention Fox (or anyone, for that matter. )
- 05/02/2010 07:13:31 PM
645 Views
PBS is biased
- 05/02/2010 07:21:14 PM
624 Views
You're entitled to believe that.
- 05/02/2010 07:31:07 PM
772 Views
PBS has an obvious yet undeclared bias so does NPR
- 09/02/2010 04:47:53 AM
599 Views
Even were that true (which I dispute) my statement stands.
- 09/02/2010 09:50:36 AM
722 Views
so they wouldn't be biased becuas it could hurt them but you still argue republicans attack them
- 09/02/2010 02:19:53 PM
677 Views
We have been for some time.
- 02/02/2010 03:31:10 AM
684 Views
I don't think that's the case
- 03/02/2010 02:59:50 PM
633 Views
Universal healthcare was the primary plank in Clintons '92 platform.
- 04/02/2010 10:02:18 AM
613 Views
That does not mean his bare plurality was an endorsement of National Healthcare
- 04/02/2010 02:09:32 PM
738 Views
I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 08:09:50 AM
783 Views
Re: I don't think he won by default, and that was his primary issue.
- 05/02/2010 03:52:23 PM
741 Views
[insert witty subject line here]
- 06/02/2010 02:15:21 AM
737 Views
Let me break this into multiple replies here
- 06/02/2010 07:45:36 PM
731 Views
'K
- 08/02/2010 01:22:12 PM
735 Views
Probably time to go into 'summary mode'
- 08/02/2010 07:34:55 PM
757 Views
Again, we're back to "how would you prefer to do it?"
- 09/02/2010 09:42:51 AM
752 Views
Any way that works, which currently probably is none
- 09/02/2010 06:12:41 PM
708 Views
I think HDI is more accurate than nothing, though it certainly needs some fine tuning.
- 10/02/2010 11:03:08 AM
788 Views
I'll play a bigger age card since it was my third election to vote in and he won because of Perot
- 05/02/2010 05:57:04 PM
622 Views
Let's put it another way: Why did Dems nominate him instead of, say, Gephardt?
- 06/02/2010 02:22:04 AM
712 Views
you don't get mandates from primaries
- 08/02/2010 02:12:29 PM
612 Views
No, but end of the day more people wanted healthcare than didn't.
- 08/02/2010 03:09:31 PM
620 Views
everyone want health care they just don't want congress runnig it
- 09/02/2010 04:56:44 AM
659 Views
Whom do you prefer?
- 09/02/2010 10:07:39 AM
699 Views
Sorry not a big fan of socialism I hear it big over in Europe though
- 09/02/2010 02:23:55 PM
591 Views
In other words you prefer the system we have; thanks for admitting it. 
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
651 Views
- 10/02/2010 10:05:38 AM
651 Views
I prefer Thomas Woods Jr's description of bipartisanship
- 02/02/2010 02:49:06 AM
663 Views
If only someone had stood up on 8 December, 1941 and said, "hey, you're not supposed to do stuff!"
- 02/02/2010 03:28:38 AM
800 Views
you're making a good job taking things out of context, Joel
- 03/02/2010 12:47:57 PM
638 Views
Don't speak in absolutes and I won't read absolutes.
- 04/02/2010 10:08:43 AM
624 Views
Some qualifiers can be left unsaid for a clearer message. Or better delivery 
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
625 Views
- 04/02/2010 10:26:56 AM
625 Views
Qualifiers are clarifying by nature.
- 04/02/2010 10:49:06 AM
739 Views
huh. That does make sense. I know malpractice is a big weight on the the system in the US.
- 04/02/2010 11:58:37 AM
604 Views
Perhaps, but it's hardly the greatest weight, or even in the top three, IMHO.
- 05/02/2010 05:44:49 AM
730 Views
Pearl Harbor would never have happened to a classically liberal nation
- 05/02/2010 01:33:56 AM
644 Views
Wow - that was a dumb statement even for you!
- 05/02/2010 04:22:59 PM
807 Views
I do generally agree, but I think the Washington Naval Conference is too often overlooked.
- 06/02/2010 02:33:51 AM
780 Views
Politicians and pundits should stop calling things that happened in the last decade "unprecedented"
- 02/02/2010 03:23:27 AM
857 Views
Or the democratic party has shifted so far to to the left they can't even get all of the dems
- 02/02/2010 02:39:14 PM
601 Views
You didn't hear all the whining when Bush was in charge with a Republican Congress?
- 02/02/2010 08:50:05 PM
620 Views
I there was plenty of whining going on
- 02/02/2010 10:36:56 PM
567 Views
Is this you conceding that the GOP is being obstructionist?
- 08/02/2010 01:43:04 PM
603 Views
I agree they are obstructing the libs from doing whatever they want
- 08/02/2010 02:19:13 PM
502 Views
They've tried including Republicans in drafting bills.
- 08/02/2010 03:08:17 PM
704 Views
tyring to pcik off one republican is not including republicans
- 09/02/2010 05:03:44 AM
617 Views
So we've gone from "stop being secretive" to "no public meetings" eh?
- 09/02/2010 11:59:50 AM
661 Views
well it was your guy who was up in arms about private meetings
- 09/02/2010 02:29:34 PM
631 Views
Was it? I don't recall any Dem complaining about private meeting on healthcare.
- 10/02/2010 09:44:56 AM
790 Views
most liberals seem to foretting the "rhetoric" that Obama used to get elected
- 13/02/2010 06:54:34 AM
597 Views
