Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
Inigo Montoya Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
You may be right about reform having to start now, too. I'm rather torn on the issue, myself - the bill as passed is not that bad in itself, but it *is* bad, even disastrous, if it's the only bill that's going to be passed for the next five or ten years. So if the polarization and ugliness that this bill has sown is such that Congress waits years before trying to pass additional reforms, I'm afraid it wasn't worth that. As such, I still think a more bipartisan bill should've been possible.
Yea, that's the thing. This bill doesn't do nearly enough on it's own to truly change or save the system financially. But I have to think it makes it a hell of alot easier going foward to make more impactful reforms down the line now that the initial hurdle has been cleared. Especially if it can be explained in terms to the public that the figures (like Klein uses that graph to illustrate) are only a drop in the bucket of our total healthcare spending. When people see that this bill hasn't taken away any "freedom" as the crazy, loud right would have us believe and has given almost everyone access to care when they're sick, I think further reform will be much more palatable to the people down the road. Especially if some of the cost-saving pilot programs included in this bill are actually coming up with real results that can be shown demonstrably to save money.
Formerly DannyBoy31
No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM
1381 Views
Meh
- 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM
736 Views
Re: Meh
- 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM
737 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this.
- 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM
844 Views
surveys are crap anyways.
- 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM
683 Views
That's ignorance speaking.
- 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM
706 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense
- 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM
637 Views
A question?
- 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM
738 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion
- 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM
769 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error*
- 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM
882 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
823 Views
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
823 Views
why?
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
353 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
353 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM
342 Views
This.
- 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM
738 Views
It's not as simple as "doing what the majority opposes is bad government. "
- 23/03/2010 06:42:04 AM
794 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM*
- 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM
379 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM
713 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM
895 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM
696 Views
I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:06:41 PM
735 Views
Re: I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:12:16 PM
781 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . .
- 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM
809 Views
I think reform had to start now.
- 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM
899 Views
That's a good column.
- 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM
794 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
- 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
822 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM
718 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM
696 Views
Let's be realistic here at least....
- 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM
704 Views
You must have an interesting definition of "most"
- 22/03/2010 05:43:38 PM
702 Views
My definition of most is obviously quite defective.
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
736 Views
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
736 Views
As long as you define "most" as "some time" you're just fine with it as it stands
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
334 Views
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
334 Views
I'd say "most" people would agree with my definition of "most" in my original post....
- 23/03/2010 05:16:59 AM
802 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning
- 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM
724 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. )
- 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM
826 Views
bingo
- 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM
853 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it?
- 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM
721 Views
It is a good start
- 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
677 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog.
- 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM
806 Views
I would say it is rather weak point
- 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM
703 Views
You realize that most countries with socialized healthcare have private healthcare, too.
- 24/03/2010 04:16:28 AM
855 Views
