Active Users:391 Time:08/04/2026 12:20:41 AM
Re: Heh Macharius Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM
My hope is that now that something is in place that some people sit down and really try to tackle the whole cost control issue.


Cost control is easy:

1. Eliminate the fee-for-service model that only encourages bloat and inefficiency.

2. Force hospitals and clinics to advertise/make public the costs of treatment, so patients can make an informed decision (the billing department knows what everything costs, why can't we?). Also, doctors should provide a choice to patients where possible.

I specifically make that last sentence because my fiancee was told to show up for surgery a week before she was ready; resulting in unnecessary usage of pre/post-op space and staff not to mention the OR itself. Waiting a week would have saved work, time, drugs, and most importantly prevented a lot of pain on her part... not to mention leaving us with $3000 less in bills). Oh, and a day of paid vacation time on my part to be with her in the hospital during all this. The surgeon even mentioned that some other doctors told patients to just come back in two weeks, why was he trying to rush her in after only three days?!

3. Make it so that insurance companies actually have to compete amongst each other(health care coverage is the least competitive industry in the economy). I think I saw Tom post a more thorough explanation of this several weeks ago.

4. Something about malpractice suits.

I'm sure a few/some/many/most would disagree with that, but that's how I see things. ;)
Reply to message
No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM 1473 Views
Meh - 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM 806 Views
Re: Meh - 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM 831 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this. - 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM 918 Views
surveys are crap anyways. - 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM 766 Views
That's ignorance speaking. - 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM 790 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense - 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM 724 Views
Some are a plurality, some are a majority.... - 22/03/2010 04:01:56 PM 841 Views
But most of them with a high/low don't go into enough detail - 22/03/2010 09:24:29 PM 890 Views
A question? - 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM 823 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion - 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM 851 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error* - 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM 961 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you - 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM 776 Views
I was thinking about this after posting - 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM 762 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha - 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM 903 Views
why? *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM 391 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM 370 Views
This. - 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM 826 Views
damn you phonetics. - 23/03/2010 03:50:33 PM 1083 Views
As Emo Philips would say - 23/03/2010 04:32:52 PM 841 Views
I always laugh when I see someone say people are "retarted" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:51:46 PM 446 Views
"Get a life, morans!" *NM* - 23/03/2010 03:55:27 PM 381 Views
I think this is one of them - 23/03/2010 12:49:35 PM 1264 Views
A step in the wrong direction. - 22/03/2010 10:38:31 AM 935 Views
didn't realize it had - 22/03/2010 11:49:36 AM 776 Views
I am happy for it - 22/03/2010 11:55:10 AM 771 Views
The Bill passed? - 22/03/2010 12:27:36 PM 881 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM 405 Views
hollah that. *NM* - 22/03/2010 01:58:47 PM 347 Views
Yes. - 22/03/2010 02:38:03 PM 782 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing? - 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM 794 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM 977 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist. - 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM 788 Views
The Bill won't get repealed. Whatever happens in November. - 23/03/2010 12:17:21 AM 802 Views
There are 18 incumbent Dem Senate seats; 41+18<67. - 29/03/2010 11:15:29 AM 801 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . . - 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM 896 Views
I think reform had to start now. - 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM 986 Views
That's a good column. - 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM 870 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM 809 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill - 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM 778 Views
Let's be realistic here at least.... - 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM 783 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning - 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM 811 Views
I'm not worried, there are lots of ways to pay for the bill. - 22/03/2010 05:36:39 PM 734 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. ) - 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM 905 Views
bingo - 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM 933 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it? - 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM 809 Views
sadly probably not a damned thing... - 24/03/2010 04:20:45 AM 773 Views
I worry the day is coming when the Bastille is stormed. - 29/03/2010 11:06:31 AM 876 Views
It is a good start - 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM 762 Views
Re: It is a good start - 22/03/2010 04:13:28 PM 744 Views
Heh - 22/03/2010 04:21:22 PM 836 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 04:32:30 PM 773 Views
Re: Heh - 22/03/2010 08:25:05 PM 842 Views
Sorry, I was out seizing the means of production. *NM* - 22/03/2010 07:43:19 PM 332 Views
You should delve the debate before getting excited. - 23/03/2010 07:22:36 AM 874 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog. - 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM 897 Views
I agree with him - 23/03/2010 12:14:47 PM 808 Views
I would say it is rather weak point - 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM 793 Views
Erm... - 23/03/2010 01:39:58 PM 899 Views
I am pleasantly surprised - 23/03/2010 04:14:52 PM 722 Views
Exceptions? - 24/03/2010 05:08:17 AM 733 Views
I haven't been following it too closely - 23/03/2010 02:10:39 PM 947 Views

Reply to Message