I think part of the problem is the difference between what constituent want THEN as opposed to NOW.
It used to be they wanted "more time off", "higher wages", "more health insurance". They just wanted the results, and their desires in regards to the methods rarely amounted to more than "without raising my taxes".
But these days, with the plethora of information, people are demanding "well we should do it this way" or "I'll ONLY support this if we do it MY way". While that's all well and good if you're completely informed, a lot of people only have half-truths and half-knowledge about the process and implementation of law, and the effects of legislation beyond the direct benefits. I don't think it's "elitist" to assume that your average person in the US does not have the desire nor the know-how to extrapolate the long-term effects of how they think things should be done.
It used to be they wanted "more time off", "higher wages", "more health insurance". They just wanted the results, and their desires in regards to the methods rarely amounted to more than "without raising my taxes".
But these days, with the plethora of information, people are demanding "well we should do it this way" or "I'll ONLY support this if we do it MY way". While that's all well and good if you're completely informed, a lot of people only have half-truths and half-knowledge about the process and implementation of law, and the effects of legislation beyond the direct benefits. I don't think it's "elitist" to assume that your average person in the US does not have the desire nor the know-how to extrapolate the long-term effects of how they think things should be done.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
No posts on the bill passing?
22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM
- 1307 Views
Meh
22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM
- 663 Views
Re: Meh
22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM
- 633 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this.
22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM
- 776 Views
surveys are crap anyways.
22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM
- 603 Views
That's ignorance speaking.
22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM
- 630 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense
22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM
- 564 Views
A question?
23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM
- 643 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion
23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM
- 691 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error*
23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM
- 805 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you
23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM
- 599 Views
I was thinking about this after posting
23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM
- 606 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha
23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
- 759 Views

why?
*NM*
23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
- 315 Views

Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM*
23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM
- 312 Views
This.
23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM
- 666 Views
It's not as simple as "doing what the majority opposes is bad government. "
23/03/2010 06:42:04 AM
- 699 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM*
22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM
- 336 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing?
22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM
- 637 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM
- 821 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM
- 627 Views
I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
22/03/2010 02:06:41 PM
- 645 Views
Re: I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
22/03/2010 02:12:16 PM
- 698 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . .
22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM
- 742 Views
I think reform had to start now.
22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM
- 816 Views
That's a good column.
22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM
- 715 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
- 747 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM
- 640 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM
- 615 Views
Let's be realistic here at least....
22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM
- 629 Views
You must have an interesting definition of "most"
22/03/2010 05:43:38 PM
- 626 Views
My definition of most is obviously quite defective.
22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
- 658 Views

As long as you define "most" as "some time" you're just fine with it as it stands
*NM*
22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
- 310 Views

I'd say "most" people would agree with my definition of "most" in my original post....
23/03/2010 05:16:59 AM
- 724 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning
22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM
- 637 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. )
23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM
- 747 Views
bingo
24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM
- 767 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it?
24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM
- 644 Views
It is a good start
22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
- 604 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog.
23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM
- 733 Views
I would say it is rather weak point
23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM
- 617 Views
You realize that most countries with socialized healthcare have private healthcare, too.
24/03/2010 04:16:28 AM
- 769 Views