I think part of the problem is the difference between what constituent want THEN as opposed to NOW.
It used to be they wanted "more time off", "higher wages", "more health insurance". They just wanted the results, and their desires in regards to the methods rarely amounted to more than "without raising my taxes".
But these days, with the plethora of information, people are demanding "well we should do it this way" or "I'll ONLY support this if we do it MY way". While that's all well and good if you're completely informed, a lot of people only have half-truths and half-knowledge about the process and implementation of law, and the effects of legislation beyond the direct benefits. I don't think it's "elitist" to assume that your average person in the US does not have the desire nor the know-how to extrapolate the long-term effects of how they think things should be done.
It used to be they wanted "more time off", "higher wages", "more health insurance". They just wanted the results, and their desires in regards to the methods rarely amounted to more than "without raising my taxes".
But these days, with the plethora of information, people are demanding "well we should do it this way" or "I'll ONLY support this if we do it MY way". While that's all well and good if you're completely informed, a lot of people only have half-truths and half-knowledge about the process and implementation of law, and the effects of legislation beyond the direct benefits. I don't think it's "elitist" to assume that your average person in the US does not have the desire nor the know-how to extrapolate the long-term effects of how they think things should be done.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM
1543 Views
Meh
- 22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM
886 Views
Re: Meh
- 22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM
910 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this.
- 22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM
1004 Views
surveys are crap anyways.
- 22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM
852 Views
That's ignorance speaking.
- 22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM
874 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense
- 22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM
806 Views
A question?
- 23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM
915 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion
- 23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM
965 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error*
- 23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM
1036 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you
- 23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM
877 Views
I was thinking about this after posting
- 23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM
859 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
982 Views
- 23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
982 Views
why?
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
434 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
434 Views
Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM
411 Views
This.
- 23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM
906 Views
It's not as simple as "doing what the majority opposes is bad government. "
- 23/03/2010 06:42:04 AM
962 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM*
- 22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM
447 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing?
- 22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM
868 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM
1051 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
- 22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM
858 Views
I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:06:41 PM
930 Views
Re: I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
- 22/03/2010 02:12:16 PM
956 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . .
- 22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM
992 Views
I think reform had to start now.
- 22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM
1074 Views
That's a good column.
- 22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM
955 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
- 22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
1004 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM
887 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
- 22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM
874 Views
Let's be realistic here at least....
- 22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM
873 Views
You must have an interesting definition of "most"
- 22/03/2010 05:43:38 PM
918 Views
My definition of most is obviously quite defective.
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
902 Views
- 22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
902 Views
As long as you define "most" as "some time" you're just fine with it as it stands
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
406 Views
*NM*
- 22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
406 Views
I'd say "most" people would agree with my definition of "most" in my original post....
- 23/03/2010 05:16:59 AM
982 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning
- 22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM
918 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. )
- 23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM
993 Views
bingo
- 24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM
1011 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it?
- 24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM
915 Views
It is a good start
- 22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
843 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog.
- 23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM
994 Views
I would say it is rather weak point
- 23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM
866 Views
You realize that most countries with socialized healthcare have private healthcare, too.
- 24/03/2010 04:16:28 AM
1003 Views
