I think part of the problem is the difference between what constituent want THEN as opposed to NOW.
It used to be they wanted "more time off", "higher wages", "more health insurance". They just wanted the results, and their desires in regards to the methods rarely amounted to more than "without raising my taxes".
But these days, with the plethora of information, people are demanding "well we should do it this way" or "I'll ONLY support this if we do it MY way". While that's all well and good if you're completely informed, a lot of people only have half-truths and half-knowledge about the process and implementation of law, and the effects of legislation beyond the direct benefits. I don't think it's "elitist" to assume that your average person in the US does not have the desire nor the know-how to extrapolate the long-term effects of how they think things should be done.
It used to be they wanted "more time off", "higher wages", "more health insurance". They just wanted the results, and their desires in regards to the methods rarely amounted to more than "without raising my taxes".
But these days, with the plethora of information, people are demanding "well we should do it this way" or "I'll ONLY support this if we do it MY way". While that's all well and good if you're completely informed, a lot of people only have half-truths and half-knowledge about the process and implementation of law, and the effects of legislation beyond the direct benefits. I don't think it's "elitist" to assume that your average person in the US does not have the desire nor the know-how to extrapolate the long-term effects of how they think things should be done.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
No posts on the bill passing?
22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM
- 1338 Views
Meh
22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM
- 688 Views
Re: Meh
22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM
- 677 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this.
22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM
- 805 Views
surveys are crap anyways.
22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM
- 630 Views
That's ignorance speaking.
22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM
- 658 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense
22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM
- 586 Views
A question?
23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM
- 672 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion
23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM
- 719 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error*
23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM
- 831 Views
On a certain level I do agree with you
23/03/2010 05:14:24 AM
- 627 Views
I was thinking about this after posting
23/03/2010 12:12:17 PM
- 633 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha
23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
- 784 Views

why?
*NM*
23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
- 329 Views

Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM*
23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM
- 325 Views
This.
23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM
- 693 Views
It's not as simple as "doing what the majority opposes is bad government. "
23/03/2010 06:42:04 AM
- 727 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM*
22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM
- 348 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing?
22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM
- 668 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM
- 853 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM
- 657 Views
I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
22/03/2010 02:06:41 PM
- 674 Views
Re: I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
22/03/2010 02:12:16 PM
- 723 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . .
22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM
- 769 Views
I think reform had to start now.
22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM
- 842 Views
That's a good column.
22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM
- 744 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
- 776 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM
- 672 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM
- 642 Views
Let's be realistic here at least....
22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM
- 659 Views
You must have an interesting definition of "most"
22/03/2010 05:43:38 PM
- 651 Views
My definition of most is obviously quite defective.
22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
- 685 Views

As long as you define "most" as "some time" you're just fine with it as it stands
*NM*
22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
- 318 Views

I'd say "most" people would agree with my definition of "most" in my original post....
23/03/2010 05:16:59 AM
- 751 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning
22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM
- 669 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. )
23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM
- 776 Views
bingo
24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM
- 798 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it?
24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM
- 671 Views
It is a good start
22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
- 629 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog.
23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM
- 761 Views
I would say it is rather weak point
23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM
- 645 Views
You realize that most countries with socialized healthcare have private healthcare, too.
24/03/2010 04:16:28 AM
- 812 Views