Using the word 'populous' instead of 'populace' to insult people for being ignorant really struck me as funny 
(I am not saying that I disagree with your sentiment or think you are ignorant. It just really hit my funny bone
)

(I am not saying that I disagree with your sentiment or think you are ignorant. It just really hit my funny bone

If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
No posts on the bill passing?
22/03/2010 08:22:27 AM
- 1309 Views
Meh
22/03/2010 09:07:27 AM
- 664 Views
Re: Meh
22/03/2010 01:53:43 PM
- 634 Views
I know what you mean. I love hearing that the "majority" are against this.
22/03/2010 01:57:15 PM
- 777 Views
surveys are crap anyways.
22/03/2010 01:59:39 PM
- 604 Views
That's ignorance speaking.
22/03/2010 02:02:46 PM
- 631 Views
well yah. Sorry, I wasn't meaning to say surveys as a whole are nonsense
22/03/2010 02:09:42 PM
- 564 Views
A question?
23/03/2010 01:11:07 AM
- 644 Views
I accept that there are situations where leaders must go against popular opinion
23/03/2010 02:53:00 AM
- 691 Views
on the other hand *edited stupid spelling error*
23/03/2010 03:09:47 AM
- 806 Views
Ahahahahahahahaha
23/03/2010 12:57:17 PM
- 761 Views

why?
*NM*
23/03/2010 03:37:00 PM
- 315 Views

Because "populous" is not a noun in English. *NM*
23/03/2010 03:42:16 PM
- 312 Views
This.
23/03/2010 03:46:25 PM
- 667 Views
It's not as simple as "doing what the majority opposes is bad government. "
23/03/2010 06:42:04 AM
- 700 Views
I think with the saturation coverage it has been getting people are just worn out *NM*
22/03/2010 01:27:59 PM
- 336 Views
Re: No posts on the bill passing?
22/03/2010 01:39:14 PM
- 640 Views
I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
22/03/2010 01:43:07 PM
- 823 Views
Re: I chose to read about it first at the NYT, then the WSJ, then the Economist.
22/03/2010 02:01:07 PM
- 628 Views
I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
22/03/2010 02:06:41 PM
- 646 Views
Re: I liked former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist's comments.
22/03/2010 02:12:16 PM
- 698 Views
I am worried. The official reports show that it will actually erase some debt. But . . .
22/03/2010 01:39:26 PM
- 743 Views
I think reform had to start now.
22/03/2010 02:27:11 PM
- 816 Views
That's a good column.
22/03/2010 02:44:56 PM
- 715 Views
Yea, he's going to be adding to it all day, trying to explain the various facets of the bill.
22/03/2010 03:05:03 PM
- 747 Views
I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
22/03/2010 03:20:54 PM
- 641 Views
Re: I think the problem highlight what I don't like about this bill
22/03/2010 03:33:31 PM
- 617 Views
Let's be realistic here at least....
22/03/2010 04:16:23 PM
- 630 Views
You must have an interesting definition of "most"
22/03/2010 05:43:38 PM
- 627 Views
My definition of most is obviously quite defective.
22/03/2010 08:05:22 PM
- 659 Views

As long as you define "most" as "some time" you're just fine with it as it stands
*NM*
22/03/2010 08:15:03 PM
- 310 Views

I'd say "most" people would agree with my definition of "most" in my original post....
23/03/2010 05:16:59 AM
- 726 Views
I hope your house is built on fimrer foundations then your reasoning
22/03/2010 04:25:49 PM
- 637 Views
You should worry about cost control (AKA the only real reason for healthcare reform to begin. )
23/03/2010 07:02:24 AM
- 749 Views
bingo
24/03/2010 03:45:48 AM
- 769 Views
Next question: WTF do we do about it?
24/03/2010 04:00:39 AM
- 645 Views
It is a good start
22/03/2010 03:01:08 PM
- 605 Views
I really like what GRR Martin wrote in his blog.
23/03/2010 09:55:11 AM
- 735 Views
I would say it is rather weak point
23/03/2010 01:12:43 PM
- 617 Views
You realize that most countries with socialized healthcare have private healthcare, too.
24/03/2010 04:16:28 AM
- 771 Views