Active Users:1070 Time:13/05/2026 02:17:33 AM
Re: [Insert relevant subject line here.] Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 27/09/2012 05:23:13 PM
Well, the simple solution there is to just get rid of classes.... :whistle:


I wish. But 3rd Edition was built entirely around classes. It was the game's very core.

Fourth edition... honestly, it sounds like I would hate it, because all of the old AD&D munchkinizing tendencies are exacerbated by attempts to cater to console gamers looking for naught but XP and powerups.


Oh, I'm sure you'd hate it. So many people do. As Written, I do as well. I just love its core mechanics, but pretty much everything they build onto that is bland as all hell.

Oh, good; I was worried we were power-gaming. :P


Heh. But like I said, stat progression is far more linear in Editions past 2nd, so the difference between the 31 strength Fire Giant and an 18 Strength fighter is the same as that same fighter would have compared to a Strength 6 character.

The way all stats work in 3rd and 4th Edition is that they give you a +1 bonus to all checks related to that attribute for every two points you put into it. 10 is +0, 18 is +4, 31 is +10.

So mid level characters cannot ignore thrashings by high levels ones for a full minute; I guess that is some improvement. The core problem remains though: The mid level character can still absorb far more damage than a low level one; the high level character just inflicts such an overwhelming amount of damage it does no matter. Against anyone less, like the low level character or even an equal level character, we still have a scenario where even if the attacker is consistently hitting an opponent doing nothing more than trying to avoid the blows it will take a while to kill him.


Yeah, but that's fine. If he's doing nothing but trying to avoid blows, then he should be fairly successful against an opponent of a similar level.

Oh, actually if he's doing nothing but avoiding attacks, he should use the total defence action for a +4 to AC.

I am not saying it should never be an option, can never make sense within any gameworld, but it should not be the norm for ALL gameworlds where characters survive long enough. And even if someone like Lan took an Aes Sedais fireball to the face or got hit with balefire he would be as dead as quickly as Baerlon drover.


Pretty sure balefire would be a save-or-die effect anyway :P.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Baldurs Gate Enhanced Edition: Edit 2 with added video & launch delay - 07/09/2012 09:48:16 PM 3510 Views
!!!!! - 07/09/2012 10:49:47 PM 1929 Views
are they created kindly or cruelly? - 08/09/2012 05:34:36 PM 1924 Views
Lol! Realistically, if exaggerated to heroic levels. - 09/09/2012 07:56:32 PM 1943 Views
I played the hell out of BG2, but only played BG1 once - 08/09/2012 06:07:15 AM 2054 Views
BGI is a lot more fun because a lot more challenging, IMHO. - 08/09/2012 02:33:17 PM 1873 Views
*revelation* - 08/09/2012 05:45:28 PM 1879 Views
fireballs are so epic in BG1 - 08/09/2012 05:41:34 PM 1916 Views
I disagree about it being the only good third level spell;lighting bolt and haste are also excellent - 08/09/2012 06:26:08 PM 2082 Views
Yeah, I loved Lightning Bolt. - 08/09/2012 06:44:59 PM 1823 Views
it was such a liability - 08/09/2012 07:11:36 PM 1939 Views
Bouncing is what makes lightning bolts great, because you get to hit people more than once. - 08/09/2012 08:59:10 PM 1857 Views
There's an unfortunate Wizard in the Firewine Bridge Ruins... - 09/09/2012 12:58:18 AM 1930 Views
Oops. - 09/09/2012 01:43:23 AM 1902 Views
that's why BG1 was so awesome. exploration=rewards - 09/09/2012 09:09:22 AM 1870 Views
Yeah, got to keep one of each on hand. - 08/09/2012 08:57:31 PM 1805 Views
Multi-player was actually pretty simple if you just used it to create your whole party. - 08/09/2012 02:19:35 PM 1912 Views
well yeah, because there was no connection to figure out - 08/09/2012 06:59:49 PM 2057 Views
Right; I was never a big multiplayer fan anyway, but customized parties were nice - 08/09/2012 08:53:45 PM 2040 Views
Where's the fun in having a customized party and losing all the character interaction, though? - 09/09/2012 04:03:10 PM 2012 Views
I dislike most of the BG NPCs anyway, so I do not much feel the lack. - 09/09/2012 04:45:12 PM 2124 Views
Re: I dislike most of the BG NPCs anyway, so I do not much feel the lack. - 10/09/2012 01:23:44 PM 1914 Views
Agreed. - 11/09/2012 07:01:07 PM 1961 Views
Suggestion since you're not using the NPCs anyway... - 15/09/2012 11:34:28 PM 1995 Views
That is a good thought; I never played IWD. - 16/09/2012 03:31:01 AM 1903 Views
Where did you think I just got it? - 16/09/2012 04:39:43 PM 1824 Views
How would I know you just got a game released in the late nineties? - 17/09/2012 06:57:19 PM 1827 Views
Re: How would I know you just got a game released in the late nineties? - 17/09/2012 11:08:09 PM 1995 Views
I still like GURPS' character points best. - 17/09/2012 11:40:12 PM 1884 Views
Heh, I'm not surprised. - 18/09/2012 01:47:55 AM 1946 Views
If you want to avoid hyperspecialization, avoid classes. - 18/09/2012 07:36:43 AM 2133 Views
I've never played GURPS, so I don't know how its system works. - 18/09/2012 03:32:21 PM 1959 Views
I recommend it, but it is a bear to run. - 19/09/2012 03:37:19 AM 2370 Views
Re: I recommend it, but it is a bear to run. - 19/09/2012 08:35:24 AM 1891 Views
It is the difference between "what if...?" and "whatever...." - 19/09/2012 10:58:31 PM 1983 Views
Re: It is the difference between "what if...?" and "whatever...." - 20/09/2012 12:31:10 AM 1914 Views
AD&D cannot avoid one-sided encounters without restricting epic characters to epic encounters. - 24/09/2012 05:53:39 AM 2243 Views
Re: AD&D cannot avoid one-sided encounters without restricting epic characters to epic encounters. - 24/09/2012 07:03:39 AM 1901 Views
Things are a little different if you are the GM, yes. - 24/09/2012 08:33:23 AM 2220 Views
Re: Things are a little different if you are the GM, yes. - 24/09/2012 07:24:51 PM 2037 Views
My point is no one should be at any level. - 25/09/2012 01:23:21 AM 2093 Views
Re: My point is no one should be at any level. - 25/09/2012 03:41:42 AM 2173 Views
I know no more about AD&D 3rd Ed. than I retain from skimming the book a few times in a store. - 25/09/2012 05:16:49 AM 1953 Views
Re: I know no more about AD&D 3rd Ed. than I retain from skimming the book a few times in a store. - 25/09/2012 06:05:39 PM 2153 Views
Re: [Insert relevant subject line here.] - 26/09/2012 08:12:05 AM 2095 Views
Re: [Insert relevant subject line here.] - 26/09/2012 05:48:34 PM 1944 Views
Re: [Insert relevant subject line here.] - 27/09/2012 10:26:16 AM 2587 Views
Re: [Insert relevant subject line here.] - 27/09/2012 05:23:13 PM 1832 Views
I can't speak for IWD I, but II is okay on the story front so far. - 18/09/2012 06:36:16 PM 1808 Views
Nah, IWD I barely had any story at all. - 18/09/2012 08:16:49 PM 1757 Views
agreed - 19/09/2012 09:42:28 AM 2048 Views
I've still only played about 4 hours of BG1 - 08/09/2012 03:59:49 PM 1989 Views
If you have not yet, you should look into the Weidu mods. - 08/09/2012 06:12:20 PM 1786 Views
But what's the point in playing the game if you don't use the NPCs? - 08/09/2012 06:47:38 PM 1872 Views
agreed the NPCs are half the fun - 08/09/2012 07:02:22 PM 1853 Views
Not having a bunch of potentially useful but AI ruined incompetents constantly fumbling. - 08/09/2012 08:55:53 PM 1924 Views
Yeah, but optimising the whole group sounds ridiculously easy. - 09/09/2012 01:03:51 AM 1800 Views
Well, there are always mods for that. - 09/09/2012 01:37:42 AM 1766 Views
For talking to pretty much anyone, really. - 09/09/2012 03:20:29 AM 1865 Views
True. - 09/09/2012 03:46:24 AM 1868 Views
Well, I usually don't have thieves in my party. - 09/09/2012 04:56:21 AM 1798 Views
there wasn't a good enough thief option in bg2/ToB - 09/09/2012 09:15:21 AM 1778 Views
I noticed that also; another argument for creating a party via MP even if you move it back to SP. - 09/09/2012 11:45:12 PM 1851 Views
storyline man! - 10/09/2012 01:43:51 PM 1886 Views
I make my OWN storyline. - 10/09/2012 06:35:43 PM 1952 Views
Just how many thieves do you even need? - 10/09/2012 06:22:58 PM 1899 Views
The stealth skills come in very handy though. - 09/09/2012 04:11:40 PM 1829 Views
Any suggested parties for beginners? *NM* - 10/09/2012 01:13:38 AM 967 Views
I plan to do custom characters for the other 6 slots - 10/09/2012 01:42:41 AM 1808 Views
There are no "other" six slots - there are six slots, period. - 10/09/2012 06:24:33 PM 1855 Views
well, absolute standard would be: - 10/09/2012 01:35:15 PM 1898 Views
My own recommendation would be: - 10/09/2012 07:36:04 PM 1844 Views
I am completely stoked about it. - 10/09/2012 07:07:09 PM 2015 Views
TotSC made BGI a LOT more fun. - 10/09/2012 07:46:03 PM 1762 Views
all the kits/races/dual wielding etc will be available in bgee - 11/09/2012 09:02:35 AM 1770 Views
Ah; nice. - 11/09/2012 06:57:14 PM 1910 Views
i'm not sure they were even state of the art at the time - 12/09/2012 09:26:05 AM 1845 Views
Remember, BGI was released only about two years after Doom. - 13/09/2012 12:05:11 AM 1878 Views
If by "two" you mean "five," then yes. DOOM was released in 1993. - 13/09/2012 03:22:58 PM 1802 Views
Ah, 1998. The golden year. Ocarina of Time. Starcraft. Half-Life. *NM* - 13/09/2012 04:16:21 PM 993 Views
Can't believe I forgot about HALF-LIFE. *NM* - 13/09/2012 09:06:55 PM 989 Views
That just reminds me of how sad it is that StarCraft died this year . *NM* - 13/09/2012 11:55:28 PM 941 Views
I don't mind the graphics in it - 12/09/2012 04:38:47 PM 1859 Views
Re: I don't mind the graphics in it - 13/09/2012 01:55:24 AM 1771 Views
I'm going to ask this here rather than start a new topic as its somewhat related. - 10/09/2012 07:42:32 PM 1827 Views
I remember Wisdom being important - 14/09/2012 04:28:23 AM 1804 Views
And it now has been delayed till Nov *NM* - 15/09/2012 03:52:41 AM 949 Views
On another note, shame on all of you for not telling me Jon Irenicus is Ra's Al Ghul - 15/09/2012 04:19:21 AM 1875 Views
Among many many others. - 17/09/2012 06:45:33 PM 1847 Views

Reply to Message