Active Users:361 Time:03/07/2025 04:31:52 AM
You are right on all accounts Tom Send a noteboard - 08/05/2017 04:48:50 PM

The Finnish plan, however, is one that was either accidentally or intentionally released in the 1990s, so we know it existed and we know the precise parameters of it - the main attack would be in the area of Petsamo and strike through to the Gulf of Bothnia and, "in the event Sweden responds", on through Sweden. Apologists tried to then claim the plan was only if the USSR were attacked by Finland, but the order is very clear that it is to be implemented "at any time if the USSR determines to implement this plan".

I will add that in June 1941 the Soviets already had AT LEAST 1,225 T-34 tanks, most of them (over 950) at the very Western border. These numbers are very difficult to find because most statistics list only production "1941-1945" or some other such nonsense. If they had been able to effectively use them it would have been interesting to see.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Was the USSR readying an attack on Germany in June 1941?/Politics in Academia - 05/05/2017 08:02:58 PM 808 Views
Churchill was correct - 06/05/2017 01:43:16 AM 460 Views
Good post Tom..very interesting. I too find myself more and more skeptical of information these days *NM* - 06/05/2017 04:42:55 AM 262 Views
yes. exactly. *NM* - 09/05/2017 09:23:06 PM 214 Views
Agreed on both points - 06/05/2017 03:37:26 PM 581 Views
Suvorov thought the Soviet main attack would be in the far north and south - 06/05/2017 07:06:16 PM 487 Views
Re: Suvorov thought the Soviet main attack would be in the far north and south - 07/05/2017 06:55:41 PM 575 Views
You are right on all accounts - 08/05/2017 04:48:50 PM 464 Views
Interesting post. It seems like a surprisingly big thing to have such controversies about... - 07/05/2017 11:17:27 AM 522 Views
I disagree on the global warming "solution" - 16/05/2017 05:19:08 AM 417 Views
I see what you mean on the 'religious fit' part, yes. - 16/05/2017 06:33:40 PM 423 Views
It doesn't make sense to rein in CO2 emissions, though - 17/05/2017 04:06:07 AM 522 Views
Was it Bjorn Lomborg? - 16/05/2017 06:56:43 PM 412 Views
I've read a little bit on this subject too. - 07/05/2017 03:24:44 PM 486 Views
Interesting read and topic - Questions - 07/05/2017 06:29:08 PM 454 Views
Re: Interesting read and topic - Questions - 07/05/2017 08:48:59 PM 493 Views
^ What he said *NM* - 16/05/2017 05:19:53 AM 274 Views
Phh! That's a relatively minor issue - 08/05/2017 03:26:55 AM 567 Views
It's long past time to start looking at that period rationally - 16/05/2017 05:28:36 AM 373 Views
To a large extent I agree - 17/05/2017 02:36:20 AM 546 Views

Reply to Message