RAFO Messageboard: To a large extent I agree by Larry

Back to Messageboard

Post New Thread

Help

Stats

Rules

To a large extent I agree Larry Send a noteboard - 17/05/2017 02:36:20 AM

View original post
I think that as the epithet "fascist" has completely been voided of all meaning it might have once had, and as people grow tired of using Hitler and the Nazis as shorthand for "unspeakable evil that we can't even comprehend", the Nazi period will be reviewed more calmly as just another period of history (one in which horrible crimes were committed, certainly, but not something aberrant to human history, which is filled with atrocities). When that happens people will be able to discern what was German, what was particularly Nazi and what processes led to mass murder. It will also be useful to Germany because it will need to reclaim some parts of its past if it wants to have a future. It can't denounce anything and everything that happened between 1933-1945 - that would be like saying everyone who likes dogs is clearly evil because Hitler liked dogs. QED.

I view both Fascism and National Socialism as being not reactions to but instead products of early 20th century modernism. Not so much in the outward images (after all, there was some reaction to Weimar's excesses) but rather in the attitude toward overarching change and the view that WWI was a disruptive event that fomented deep societal transformations, not all of which were ultimately positive. Have you read Modris Eksteins's The Rites of Spring? It makes some cogent arguments along these lines.

I do need to reimmerse myself in recent scholarship, however, as I believe there have been some recent research trending in the directions you mention above.

Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.

Reply to message

Was the USSR readying an attack on Germany in June 1941?/Politics in Academia Tom - 05/05/2017 08:02:58 PM 735 Views

Churchill was correct damookster - 06/05/2017 01:43:16 AM 397 Views

Good post Tom..very interesting. I too find myself more and more skeptical of information these days *NM* Urza - 06/05/2017 04:42:55 AM 232 Views

yes. exactly. *NM* AgentApple - 09/05/2017 09:23:06 PM 183 Views

Agreed on both points Cannoli - 06/05/2017 03:37:26 PM 511 Views

Suvorov thought the Soviet main attack would be in the far north and south Tom - 06/05/2017 07:06:16 PM 410 Views

Re: Suvorov thought the Soviet main attack would be in the far north and south Cannoli - 07/05/2017 06:55:41 PM 503 Views

You are right on all accounts Tom - 08/05/2017 04:48:50 PM 401 Views

Interesting post. It seems like a surprisingly big thing to have such controversies about... Legolas - 07/05/2017 11:17:27 AM 458 Views

I disagree on the global warming "solution" Tom - 16/05/2017 05:19:08 AM 352 Views

I see what you mean on the 'religious fit' part, yes. Legolas - 16/05/2017 06:33:40 PM 359 Views

It doesn't make sense to rein in CO2 emissions, though Tom - 17/05/2017 04:06:07 AM 443 Views

Was it Bjorn Lomborg? LiterateDog - 16/05/2017 06:56:43 PM 350 Views

I think it was someone else, actually, an American - but that one's great too Tom - 17/05/2017 04:03:48 AM 343 Views

I've read a little bit on this subject too. The Shrike - 07/05/2017 03:24:44 PM 421 Views

I rarely read histories about anything Russian in the English language Tom - 16/05/2017 05:10:44 AM 343 Views

Interesting read and topic - Questions Anonymous2000 - 07/05/2017 06:29:08 PM 385 Views

Re: Interesting read and topic - Questions Cannoli - 07/05/2017 08:48:59 PM 434 Views

^ What he said *NM* Tom - 16/05/2017 05:19:53 AM 196 Views

Phh! That's a relatively minor issue

Larry - 08/05/2017 03:26:55 AM 496 Views

It's long past time to start looking at that period rationally Tom - 16/05/2017 05:28:36 AM 310 Views

To a large extent I agree Larry - 17/05/2017 02:36:20 AM 467 Views

Very interesting. Never heard about any of this. And those hardware figures are astounding. *NM* AgentApple - 09/05/2017 09:25:11 PM 261 Views

Back to Messageboard

Post New Thread

Help

Stats

Rules

Reply to Message

Subject

Formatting

Smiley Codes

Body

<quote id="294972">
<quote id="294949">
I think that as the epithet "fascist" has completely been voided of all meaning it might have once had, and as people grow tired of using Hitler and the Nazis as shorthand for "unspeakable evil that we can't even comprehend", the Nazi period will be reviewed more calmly as just another period of history (one in which horrible crimes were committed, certainly, but not something aberrant to human history, which is filled with atrocities).  When that happens people will be able to discern what was German, what was particularly Nazi and what processes led to mass murder.  It will also be useful to Germany because it will need to reclaim some parts of its past if it wants to have a future.  It can't denounce anything and everything that happened between 1933-1945 - that would be like saying everyone who likes dogs is clearly evil because Hitler liked dogs.  QED.  
</quote>

I view both Fascism and National Socialism as being not reactions to but instead products of early 20th century modernism.  Not so much in the outward images (after all, there was some reaction to Weimar's excesses) but rather in the attitude toward overarching change and the view that WWI was a disruptive event that fomented deep societal transformations, not all of which were ultimately positive.  Have you read Modris Eksteins's <i>The Rites of Spring</i>?  It makes some cogent arguments along these lines.

I do need to reimmerse myself in recent scholarship, however, as I believe there have been some recent research trending in the directions you mention above.
</quote>

Link title

Link url

Send notification emails?

Username

Password