Active Users:349 Time:03/07/2025 01:52:12 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Especially since there are allegations that Trump didn't have reasons but ordered them to be found. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 10/05/2017 08:20:05 AM

Jeff Zeleny of CNN apparently reported today that "[he was] told just moments ago that the president himself has been thinking about this for at least a week, did not necessarily have the rationale when they first started talking about this, but then asked the attorney general and the deputy attorney general to look for that rationale."

Now, in fairness, Trump might have been thinking "god, this guy is terrible at his job, but I need specific reasons to fire him." Unfortunately, they chose possibly the worst possible date to fire him. Seriously, on the day grand jury subpoenas got sent out on the Russia investigation?

"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Comey was fired today.. Urza - 10/05/2017 05:41:17 AM 1100 Views
It's hard to make this look good. And I'm dubious of their reasons. *NM* Ghavrel - 10/05/2017 06:19:12 AM 201 Views
With the media emotionally tied to selling Trump chatted it will be a hard sell. *NM* random thoughts - 10/05/2017 05:20:27 PM 223 Views
The firing as such is one thing, but the timing raises major question marks. Legolas - 10/05/2017 07:29:57 AM 462 Views
Especially since there are allegations that Trump didn't have reasons but ordered them to be found. Ghavrel - 10/05/2017 08:20:05 AM 439 Views
Please...this is totally overblown Tom - 10/05/2017 03:58:49 PM 370 Views
What question marks? I know that is the talking point but they stop there random thoughts - 10/05/2017 05:24:59 PM 360 Views
It doesn't necessarily have to be about Trump personally. Legolas - 10/05/2017 08:13:12 PM 504 Views
There is zero evidence that Flynn colluded with the Russians on the campaign random thoughts - 10/05/2017 09:36:20 PM 363 Views
Aren't you confusing several things? Legolas - 11/05/2017 07:16:21 PM 334 Views
How many of those people telling there is something there despite any evidence are political enemies *NM* random thoughts - 13/05/2017 01:22:59 AM 276 Views
Sigh that is an arguement of rhetoric and not logic. Roland00 - 13/05/2017 06:08:25 AM 371 Views
Agreed on all points. *NM* The Shrike - 11/05/2017 04:26:32 PM 233 Views
I read he found out by seeing it on the news. Aviendha - 10/05/2017 08:42:28 AM 510 Views
I heard he found out because he's one of Trump's twitter followers *NM* aerocontrols - 10/05/2017 01:58:10 PM 220 Views
I've seen it now. Aviendha - 10/05/2017 10:11:59 PM 358 Views
I read that too Sareitha Sedai - 10/05/2017 02:18:29 PM 504 Views
He was speaking on the west coast, at a FBI event Roland00 - 11/05/2017 04:48:32 AM 359 Views
Mitch McConnell isn't worried, so I'm sure it's fine. *NM* nossy - 10/05/2017 03:53:58 PM 246 Views
Sarcasm aside, have you seen even a shred of evidence that it was improper? Tom - 10/05/2017 04:01:46 PM 437 Views
Are these like the "shreds of evidence" people threw up all over me about how corrupt Clinton is? nossy - 10/05/2017 04:35:29 PM 407 Views
When did we start investigating a sitting president when there is zero recurrence her was involved? random thoughts - 10/05/2017 05:34:50 PM 441 Views
When which now? nossy - 10/05/2017 06:10:11 PM 356 Views
Can you point to single piece of evidence tying Trump campaign worker's to the email hacks? random thoughts - 10/05/2017 09:47:00 PM 360 Views
Can *I*? No. But then I'm a landscape designer living in the UK. nossy - 10/05/2017 11:03:56 PM 368 Views
Let's just take that one extra step Tom - 11/05/2017 02:51:49 PM 408 Views
Heh, well that must be terrible for you. nossy - 11/05/2017 03:40:16 PM 509 Views
Not even the president is required to prove his innocence random thoughts - 11/05/2017 04:06:30 PM 415 Views
But firing the person leading an investigation isn't how to determine one's innocence, hence nossy - 11/05/2017 04:19:13 PM 391 Views
If the same people claiming it was suspicious weren't the same ones calling for him to be fired random thoughts - 11/05/2017 05:50:12 PM 434 Views
But the firing doesn't affect the investigation Tom - 11/05/2017 07:04:01 PM 337 Views
Seriously you are saying firing the person in charge of an investigation does not affect the Roland00 - 11/05/2017 09:23:38 PM 465 Views
I can't point to a single piece of evidence that you can see, but I can point to evidence that is in Roland00 - 11/05/2017 05:33:32 AM 420 Views
I can't prove that the NSA isn't using brain control waves but I still don't wear a tin foil hat *NM* random thoughts - 11/05/2017 04:09:57 PM 268 Views
No I can't argue against a negative Roland00 - 11/05/2017 04:45:18 AM 374 Views
I'm only surprised it didn't happen earlier Tom - 10/05/2017 03:56:10 PM 396 Views
Doesn't that feel like The Point? nossy - 10/05/2017 06:39:00 PM 413 Views
How can Trump prove a negative, though? Tom - 14/05/2017 09:52:47 PM 447 Views
Indeed it does. And a lot of people rather doubt Trump would nominate someone like that. Legolas - 10/05/2017 08:00:53 PM 486 Views
That op-ed was a complete waste of time to read Tom - 11/05/2017 07:21:15 PM 338 Views
You should be glad I didn't go with the Guardian's take then. Legolas - 11/05/2017 08:00:32 PM 397 Views
I think you're full of shit, too. Tom - 12/05/2017 06:25:59 AM 339 Views
The funny thing with Trump is... Legolas - 17/05/2017 06:13:54 PM 636 Views
The drama isn't coming from the White House, though Tom - 17/05/2017 07:48:34 PM 395 Views
The drama is coming from two sources. Both of them located, at least in part, in the White House. Legolas - 17/05/2017 09:02:15 PM 670 Views
Sorry that wss nothing but partisan babble *NM* random thoughts - 12/05/2017 02:30:36 AM 279 Views
Hint: when a good amount of Republicans are saying the same thing, the word is 'bipartisan'. *NM* Legolas - 12/05/2017 07:26:16 AM 205 Views
You'd think some of the HRC diehard types would be cheering. *NM* Vodalus - 10/05/2017 10:24:28 PM 241 Views
A normal president would ask for a resignation instead of firing Roland00 - 11/05/2017 04:25:11 AM 370 Views
Sorry l all heard was two legs good four legs bad baaa baa baa *NM* random thoughts - 11/05/2017 05:53:21 PM 278 Views
"The river tells no lies, though standing on the shore the dishonest man still hears them." *NM* Roland00 - 11/05/2017 09:14:00 PM 812 Views
I'm sick to death of all this shit. damookster - 11/05/2017 05:10:26 PM 343 Views
Yes. nossy - 12/05/2017 10:19:19 AM 284 Views
pics or it didn't happen *NM* damookster - 12/05/2017 04:08:18 PM 243 Views
Mookie do not be sick, and do not call upon the spectre of death onto yourself Roland00 - 12/05/2017 03:30:06 PM 324 Views
I will never reach senility damookster - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 435 Views
damned double post - ironic considering the subject line *NM* damookster - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 223 Views
Says the guy who doubles post Roland00 - 12/05/2017 04:13:16 PM 339 Views
I'll take door number two, thank you very much. *NM* damookster - 12/05/2017 04:20:54 PM 209 Views
Mookie your Yodaish is still a work in progress Roland00 - 12/05/2017 04:33:07 PM 352 Views
So Trump admits 48 hours later, Comey was fired due to Russia, yet he claimed earlier it was due to Roland00 - 12/05/2017 03:25:23 PM 366 Views
Hint call it what you well but when it the bias leads that hard it is nothing but agenda given propa *NM* random thoughts - 13/05/2017 01:28:12 AM 244 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes