Active Users:733 Time:18/12/2025 08:03:16 PM
You should be glad I didn't go with the Guardian's take then. Legolas Send a noteboard - 11/05/2017 08:00:32 PM

View original postI generally like reason.com, but by reason's standards that was a piss-poor article. Aside from quoting never Trumper Jonah Goldberg from the National Review, it's just more of the same rank innuendo that everyone is throwing around.

You say never Trumper as if that's a bad thing. Unless Trump changes pretty radically, and at this point it's looking like that would require a brain and personality transplant, the Republican party will be glad moving forward to have some people left who openly opposed being led by a childish loud-mouthed bully without discernible conservative philosophy like Trump. Of course there's plenty of Republican politicians who don't actually follow him in any meaningful way, but it's easier to get credit for principled and public opposition than for 'I tried to limit the damage without rocking the boat too much'.
View original postLet's remember a few points:


View original post1. The firing doesn't affect the investigation. It goes on.

Maybe. Depends who's appointed to replace him. The best case scenario here is that somehow, against all appearances, the firing was not about the Russia investigation or Comey's denial of Trump's claims. That it was in fact done for valid reasons, and the only thing that went wrong was Trump and his staff lacking the political sense to see beforehand what this would look like. I'm generally in favour of the 'don't ascribe to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence' idea, so I try to keep an open mind on that possibility. But hell yes, I'm sceptical.
View original post2. There was something else that happened recently other than the subpoenas. Comey testified before Congress on MAY 3. Members of Congress asked him about his actions in July 2016 and October 2016. Comey made a horrendously bad showing. He proved to Congress that he, while probably a fantastic law enforcement professional, was clearly out of his depth in the politics of it all. If Trump was considering firing him already, that testimony was the final nail in Comey's political coffin.

You mean the same way that Trump and his staff in the White House make horrendously bad showings on a weekly basis? And he loves it as long as the bad showing involves polishing his ego in public? This would be a credible argument if used by a serious president, but when used in defense of Trump it's almost as laughable as the arguments he actually did use in the letter he sent. Which, incidentally, I see you're smart enough to avoid mentioning.

If you're frustrated that everyone is harping on Trump's every move, you may want to consider that this has something to do with the man himself and his track record so far, both as a candidate and as a president, which is to say negligible on accomplishments while redefining all previous standards on blunders and controversies. He won't be due the deference presidents would normally be due until he can act like one.

Reply to message
Comey was fired today.. - 10/05/2017 05:41:17 AM 1148 Views
The firing as such is one thing, but the timing raises major question marks. - 10/05/2017 07:29:57 AM 503 Views
What question marks? I know that is the talking point but they stop there - 10/05/2017 05:24:59 PM 398 Views
It doesn't necessarily have to be about Trump personally. - 10/05/2017 08:13:12 PM 557 Views
There is zero evidence that Flynn colluded with the Russians on the campaign - 10/05/2017 09:36:20 PM 400 Views
Aren't you confusing several things? - 11/05/2017 07:16:21 PM 374 Views
Agreed on all points. *NM* - 11/05/2017 04:26:32 PM 249 Views
I read he found out by seeing it on the news. - 10/05/2017 08:42:28 AM 553 Views
I heard he found out because he's one of Trump's twitter followers *NM* - 10/05/2017 01:58:10 PM 239 Views
I've seen it now. - 10/05/2017 10:11:59 PM 434 Views
I read that too - 10/05/2017 02:18:29 PM 545 Views
He was speaking on the west coast, at a FBI event - 11/05/2017 04:48:32 AM 398 Views
Mitch McConnell isn't worried, so I'm sure it's fine. *NM* - 10/05/2017 03:53:58 PM 265 Views
Sarcasm aside, have you seen even a shred of evidence that it was improper? - 10/05/2017 04:01:46 PM 480 Views
Are these like the "shreds of evidence" people threw up all over me about how corrupt Clinton is? - 10/05/2017 04:35:29 PM 445 Views
When did we start investigating a sitting president when there is zero recurrence her was involved? - 10/05/2017 05:34:50 PM 507 Views
No I can't argue against a negative - 11/05/2017 04:45:18 AM 420 Views
I'm only surprised it didn't happen earlier - 10/05/2017 03:56:10 PM 432 Views
Doesn't that feel like The Point? - 10/05/2017 06:39:00 PM 458 Views
How can Trump prove a negative, though? - 14/05/2017 09:52:47 PM 491 Views
Indeed it does. And a lot of people rather doubt Trump would nominate someone like that. - 10/05/2017 08:00:53 PM 528 Views
That op-ed was a complete waste of time to read - 11/05/2017 07:21:15 PM 386 Views
You should be glad I didn't go with the Guardian's take then. - 11/05/2017 08:00:32 PM 450 Views
I think you're full of shit, too. - 12/05/2017 06:25:59 AM 377 Views
The funny thing with Trump is... - 17/05/2017 06:13:54 PM 677 Views
Sorry that wss nothing but partisan babble *NM* - 12/05/2017 02:30:36 AM 299 Views
You'd think some of the HRC diehard types would be cheering. *NM* - 10/05/2017 10:24:28 PM 259 Views
I'm sick to death of all this shit. - 11/05/2017 05:10:26 PM 385 Views
Yes. - 12/05/2017 10:19:19 AM 322 Views
pics or it didn't happen *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:08:18 PM 262 Views
Mookie do not be sick, and do not call upon the spectre of death onto yourself - 12/05/2017 03:30:06 PM 364 Views
I will never reach senility - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 477 Views
damned double post - ironic considering the subject line *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM 247 Views
Says the guy who doubles post - 12/05/2017 04:13:16 PM 387 Views
I'll take door number two, thank you very much. *NM* - 12/05/2017 04:20:54 PM 230 Views
Mookie your Yodaish is still a work in progress - 12/05/2017 04:33:07 PM 393 Views

Reply to Message