Active Users:2346 Time:20/06/2026 03:18:20 AM
Re: No Cannoli Send a noteboard - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM


The problem with your logic is that you think moral consistency is some kind of bar to homophobia.

No, the point I think he is making is that I do not discriminate against homosexuality except in the normal everyday acceptable ways. Such as not engaging in it and so forth. I treat homosexual activity the same way I treat heterosexual activity. And there are many sort of heterosexual relationships and activities which are not legitimized by marriage or cannot be engaged in marriage as well.

The ridiculous standards by which you expand the definitions of homophobia to maintain its relevance make everyone who is not actually homosexual a homophobe". People who refuse to have sex with a member of same sex are thus homophobic, especially if their reason for refraining is that they are not only not attracted to the same sex, or enticed or stimulated by the activity, but actually turned off, is well within the definition of an "aversion" to it.

Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1339 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 664 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 655 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 668 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 341 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 650 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 327 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 734 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 629 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 674 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 660 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 689 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 649 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 585 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 639 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 670 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 654 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 664 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 626 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 700 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 763 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 624 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 628 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 691 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 645 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 616 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 642 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 648 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 635 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 642 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 646 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 652 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 646 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 644 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 440 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 644 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 647 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 317 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 660 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 647 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 614 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 678 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 607 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 692 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 690 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 674 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 726 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 613 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 665 Views

Reply to Message