Active Users:519 Time:03/11/2026 08:41:04 AM
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". LiterateDog Send a noteboard - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM

But, as with minorities, women, and the poor, I don't think these paragons of leftist virtue give two shits about gay people deep in their hearts. We're a means to an end: power. Blue collar whites used to be a core constituency of the left, but as soon as some group more useful came along, it was fuck you whitey. Leftists screw blacks over in schools because the teachers' unions have money and power. They've been able to convince blacks that the leftist plantation is their only hope.

So, given that context, how can anyone be shocked at casual homophobia from them this group when it can be a useful tool of denigration, given that our society isn't yet fully evolved yet in dealing with homosexuals? I find the submissive aspects of gay sex quite thrilling, but not in a demeaning way. People using these terms and images to denigrate their opponents most certainly DO mean it to be demeaning.

Finally, the idea of people using "that sucks" or some such as being homophobic is ridiculous. No one thinks of men or women sucking dick when they say that. But, they most certainly do when people use the examples of Trump and Putin, because the speakers WANT them to and want them to be disgusted by it.

So, fuck you lefty hypocrites. Never liked you anyway.

"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1399 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 723 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 711 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 737 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 379 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 710 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 361 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 788 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 683 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 749 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 722 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 746 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 703 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 640 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 698 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 740 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 708 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 729 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 691 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 760 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 818 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 677 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 685 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 755 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 704 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 675 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 697 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 706 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 687 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 697 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 703 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 706 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 706 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 710 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 473 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 701 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 705 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 347 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 715 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 701 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 663 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 737 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 664 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 747 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 751 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 731 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 790 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 671 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 723 Views

Reply to Message