Active Users:786 Time:03/02/2026 07:42:52 PM
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". LiterateDog Send a noteboard - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM

But, as with minorities, women, and the poor, I don't think these paragons of leftist virtue give two shits about gay people deep in their hearts. We're a means to an end: power. Blue collar whites used to be a core constituency of the left, but as soon as some group more useful came along, it was fuck you whitey. Leftists screw blacks over in schools because the teachers' unions have money and power. They've been able to convince blacks that the leftist plantation is their only hope.

So, given that context, how can anyone be shocked at casual homophobia from them this group when it can be a useful tool of denigration, given that our society isn't yet fully evolved yet in dealing with homosexuals? I find the submissive aspects of gay sex quite thrilling, but not in a demeaning way. People using these terms and images to denigrate their opponents most certainly DO mean it to be demeaning.

Finally, the idea of people using "that sucks" or some such as being homophobic is ridiculous. No one thinks of men or women sucking dick when they say that. But, they most certainly do when people use the examples of Trump and Putin, because the speakers WANT them to and want them to be disgusted by it.

So, fuck you lefty hypocrites. Never liked you anyway.

"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1277 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 603 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 586 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 613 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 312 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 592 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 300 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 659 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 570 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 600 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 605 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 626 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 585 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 520 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 581 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 613 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 599 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 596 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 573 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 634 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 686 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 561 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 570 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 630 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 568 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 551 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 583 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 579 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 567 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 570 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 581 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 588 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 584 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 582 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 408 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 579 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 583 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 289 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 597 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 582 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 556 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 614 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 552 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 630 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 622 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 616 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 659 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 552 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 602 Views

Reply to Message