Active Users:368 Time:02/05/2025 06:04:09 AM
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". LiterateDog Send a noteboard - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM

But, as with minorities, women, and the poor, I don't think these paragons of leftist virtue give two shits about gay people deep in their hearts. We're a means to an end: power. Blue collar whites used to be a core constituency of the left, but as soon as some group more useful came along, it was fuck you whitey. Leftists screw blacks over in schools because the teachers' unions have money and power. They've been able to convince blacks that the leftist plantation is their only hope.

So, given that context, how can anyone be shocked at casual homophobia from them this group when it can be a useful tool of denigration, given that our society isn't yet fully evolved yet in dealing with homosexuals? I find the submissive aspects of gay sex quite thrilling, but not in a demeaning way. People using these terms and images to denigrate their opponents most certainly DO mean it to be demeaning.

Finally, the idea of people using "that sucks" or some such as being homophobic is ridiculous. No one thinks of men or women sucking dick when they say that. But, they most certainly do when people use the examples of Trump and Putin, because the speakers WANT them to and want them to be disgusted by it.

So, fuck you lefty hypocrites. Never liked you anyway.

"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
Reply to message
Interesting article in my Twitter feed last night on an issue Greg (The Shrike) brought up... - 15/08/2018 03:05:37 PM 1180 Views
I thought this response in the comment sectionwas funny - 15/08/2018 08:12:49 PM 515 Views
I was thinking about this at lunch today.... - 15/08/2018 11:43:33 PM 482 Views
I don't - 16/08/2018 12:09:32 AM 493 Views
It seemed more like moondog was making a prostitution reference to me *NM* - 16/08/2018 02:51:23 AM 264 Views
Say what? - 16/08/2018 09:47:19 PM 492 Views
It is a more of a domination / hierarchy reference I think *NM* - 16/08/2018 09:57:23 PM 259 Views
Re: Say what? - 16/08/2018 10:33:43 PM 544 Views
Yes, but there's more to it... - 16/08/2018 10:38:05 PM 475 Views
Says who? - 19/08/2018 05:05:37 AM 500 Views
However much of a hypocrite moondog is, the article, I feel, represents something else - 16/08/2018 05:51:59 AM 517 Views
Phobia - 16/08/2018 10:55:05 PM 504 Views
You don't even understand oral sex? - 17/08/2018 12:43:50 AM 493 Views
Get to a sex education class, won't you? Or at least, use Google - 17/08/2018 05:29:25 AM 440 Views
I am a normal male person, who had conversations with other male people. - 17/08/2018 08:25:48 AM 464 Views
Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 17/08/2018 04:13:09 PM 520 Views
Re: Yes, yes, you're so male, your penis has a penis. We get it. - 19/08/2018 03:23:10 AM 510 Views
You are wrong about Cannoli. - 17/08/2018 02:49:35 AM 503 Views
No - 17/08/2018 05:41:22 AM 482 Views
Re: No - 19/08/2018 03:29:15 AM 523 Views
Cannoli is right: "sucks" implies the active party in oral sex - 17/08/2018 03:04:40 AM 592 Views
That would be the "receptive partner" in scientific terminology - 17/08/2018 05:44:16 AM 472 Views
Fuck scientific terminology. It blows. - 17/08/2018 08:26:16 AM 484 Views
Regarding phobia - 17/08/2018 06:30:51 PM 513 Views
There's a pretty simple test, I think - 17/08/2018 08:02:31 PM 484 Views
Once again...who are you to make that determination. - 17/08/2018 09:54:41 PM 458 Views
*I* don't make the determination, liberal society did. - 18/08/2018 12:02:22 AM 497 Views
So for clarity - 18/08/2018 01:28:17 AM 493 Views
Yes! - 18/08/2018 01:46:05 AM 477 Views
Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:10:46 AM 479 Views
Re: Who said I was surprised? - 18/08/2018 02:32:41 AM 495 Views
Are you asking a serious question? - 18/08/2018 02:45:03 AM 506 Views
Yes, I was - 18/08/2018 01:59:48 PM 502 Views
"liberal" society does not police speech - 19/08/2018 03:31:54 AM 490 Views
You don't need to protect speech everyone agrees with. *NM* - 19/08/2018 06:02:17 PM 296 Views
It most certainly *does* police speech. - 20/08/2018 03:01:32 PM 488 Views
But to follow up on that. - 20/08/2018 03:16:07 PM 484 Views
Well, that's why we didn't stop with the FIRST Amendment *NM* - 21/08/2018 04:25:53 PM 248 Views
That's individuals policing speech, not society. Agregate individual action =/= collective action - 21/08/2018 04:25:23 PM 501 Views
I completely agree. - 21/08/2018 04:35:38 PM 458 Views
heh, heh, heh - 21/08/2018 05:00:32 PM 469 Views
Hump it like you mean it! - 21/08/2018 07:00:01 PM 519 Views
About the casual part - 16/08/2018 10:33:45 PM 467 Views
I don't think it's appropriate, but I think it's more about sexual shaming - 16/08/2018 10:35:53 PM 540 Views
Precisely - 16/08/2018 10:59:42 PM 500 Views
You are absolutely correct - 17/08/2018 02:43:21 AM 492 Views
I, for one, am glad to see this topic go flaming. - 17/08/2018 05:16:55 PM 555 Views
Yes, it is a tool used by those who should "know better". - 20/08/2018 03:14:30 PM 461 Views
well said - 20/08/2018 03:50:50 PM 508 Views

Reply to Message