Active Users:545 Time:31/10/2026 02:13:35 PM
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. damookster Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM

All the Dark One’s resurrections of Forsaken contained elements that were punishments for their failures. Like being shorter, weaker, older, uglier. Or in Ishamael’s case, being alive. So in RJ’s world, transsexualism is a torment inflicted by the evil deity? That’s the conclusion, amirite?

What we really learn is that it’s probably for the best RJ is gone. His creation would never make it today. It’s not diverse enough.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 1002 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 697 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 729 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 676 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 694 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 442 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 696 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 625 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 678 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 692 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 702 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 668 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 848 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 680 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 678 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 694 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 721 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 682 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 676 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 674 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 668 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 325 Views

Reply to Message