Active Users:355 Time:03/05/2024 11:49:11 AM
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* TyrReborn Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM

View original post
There are people...actual humans...who are called "it" all the time, and no one even blinks. In fact, I've heard the word used from two totally different places.

1) The word "it" is used to reference a baby yet to be born. When one is asking the question of "Are you going to find out if it's a boy or a girl?" In this instance, the word "It" is used as a pronoun because of the uncertainty factor. It is not used in a disparaging way

2) The word "it" is used to help justify an abortion, or the Holocaust, or ethnic cleansing, or any other situation where a person is "dehumanized" in order to make their death more justifiable to the individual or group.

In both instances, the word is used in reference to another person, however the intent behind the usage characterizes it dramatically different.

~Jeordam


Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 631 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 348 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 384 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 351 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 344 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 276 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 332 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 311 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 328 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 361 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 352 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 334 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 471 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 342 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 345 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 353 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 354 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 337 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 344 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 314 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 345 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 165 Views

Reply to Message