Active Users:374 Time:03/05/2024 12:18:41 PM
Because it is just contempt Roland00 Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM

View original post
Why the adult qualifier? Is the age of the individual a factor in whether one is "humanized" or not?

~Jeordam


Because it is just contempt, and contempt being expressed to another human being has so little benefits in human conversation.

Here, let the AEI president Arthur C. Brooks describe this point. (Well former president now for he retired this year in 2018 after a 10 year stint at running AEI, AEI is usually considered one of the two most important conservative think tanks in the US)

EKS, it starts with "Contempt conviction of the utter worthlessness of another human being"
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 631 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 348 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 384 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 351 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 345 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 276 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 332 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 311 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 328 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 361 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 352 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 334 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 472 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 342 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 345 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 353 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 354 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 337 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 344 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 314 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 345 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 165 Views

Reply to Message